Skip to comments.
OMG, UNBELIEVABLE: Wellesley College 1969 Student Commencement Speech of Hillary D. Rodham
http://216.239.37.100/search?q=cache:jNWMQlcpuVsC:www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html+Hillary+Clinton+(Wellesley+commencement)&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 ^
| Circa 1969
| Wellesley web site
Posted on 02/15/2003 7:47:35 AM PST by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
To: Liz
Das Kapital was a political tome with a new (though erroneous) theory of economics.
Hillary's address has all the weight of a Miss America speech by a communist sorority sister trying out for cheerleader.
To: patriciaruth
Marx's tome was not only an economic theory but a passionate exhortation, "Workers of the world, unite," while Hitlery exhorts, "Students of the world unite."
As a guideline for analyzing a mindset bent on the manipulation of the populace, Das Kapital - and Hitlery's speech - succeed quite well.
82
posted on
02/17/2003 3:27:09 AM PST
by
Liz
To: scott7278
Intelligent? Absolutely not .... Hitlery and Bill's cunning political instincts - wrongly perceived as intelligence - have served them well. These two connivers have never had an unscripted moment in their entire lives.
83
posted on
02/17/2003 3:31:11 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
2004 is HILLARY'S big decision. None of the dem candidates can pull her numbers.
If she waits until 2008, she might have to deal with Powell or Rice!
Both could make her look like a fool in a debate. She knows it's now or never.
She needs her right to destroy America more than the rapist did!
She will not enter the fray until the the dwarfs trip over themselves.
At the convention in Boston, they will fawn over her, and she will take the bait!
Oh yeah... the Clintons are connivers, but they are also conivores
84
posted on
02/17/2003 4:06:11 AM PST
by
johnny7
(You know, the American voter is stupid. -HRC)
To: pollwatcher
Hitlery on Nixon: "Impeachment did not have to be for criminal offense but only for a course of conduct that suggested an abuse of power or a disregard for the office of the President of the United States." ..."that a person's course of conduct, while not particularly criminal could be of such a nature that it destroys trust, discourages allegiance, and demands action by the Congress." "...the office of the President is such that it calls for a higher level of conduct than that of the average citizen of the United States." Both Hitlery and her conniving husband's actions are ten thousand times more egregious than anything Nixon was ever accused of doing. The Clintons got away with enormous crimes against the state.
Hitlery exploits American history. In fact all elected officials are held to a higher standard of conduct than the citizenry b/c they have the power of the purse. Actions by elected officals that would not rise to the level of jaywalking by an average citizen, are prosecutable when committed by someone in office.
Case in point: If you or I received a valuble gift by someone who had interests on Capitol Hill, it would not be a crime. But a Senator or Congressman accepting the very same gift would be breaking the law.
Moreover, public servants - unelected persons employed in public offices in a township or county - cannot accept even a cup of coffee from someone doing business with that office.
85
posted on
02/17/2003 4:08:13 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz; cavtrooper21; Paul Atreides; cake_crumb; WhirlwindAttack; Grampa Dave; Mudboy Slim; ...
<< Trust? Integriity? Respect? >>
For me any details that may or may not be contained within it are swept away by the enormity of the sheer asininity and puerile infantilism of the whole diatribe.
Such morbid asininity and puerile infantilism, that is, as are dupicated and exceeded only by this frumpish psychopathologically-predatory recidivist's Elena-Ceausescu-cloned co-serial-rapist's lifetime of egomaniacly-imperialistic criminality.
86
posted on
02/17/2003 4:32:26 AM PST
by
Brian Allen
(This above all -- to thine own self be true)
To: Liz; pollwatcher
<< Both Hitlery and her conniving husband's actions are ten thousand times more egregious than anything Nixon was ever accused of doing. >>
True.
<< The Cli'tons "got away with" enormous crimes ..... >>
Thus far, it seems.
87
posted on
02/17/2003 4:35:54 AM PST
by
Brian Allen
(This above all -- to thine own self be true)
To: Liz
How did you get this? I thought Wellesley wouldn't make this public. Don't forget that she and her commie friends lobbied to speak and she was not Valedictorian nor
salutatorian. Traditionally a student did not speak at graduation. Also, I believe that the speach she submitted to the faculty was not given and instead she went into a diatribe against Senator Brooke.
88
posted on
02/17/2003 5:35:31 AM PST
by
Jimmy Valentine's brother
(Let the US and British led weapon inspections in force start now!)
To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
You got the wrong info. Wellesley apparently has not allowed Hillary's thesis to be released (no doubt on her orders).
89
posted on
02/17/2003 5:41:44 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Absolutely. With them I wish it could be sooner!
To: cubreporter
The word "articulable" is in my Miriam Webster but "inarticulable" is not. The prefix "in-" seems to be an improper usage in this case and it would seem the phrase "not articulable" is the preferred usage.
Smartest woman in the world? Feh.
To: bvw
Methinks that speechwritting effort went to POT!
92
posted on
02/17/2003 10:37:18 AM PST
by
G Larry
($10K gifts to John Thune before he announces!)
To: Liz; timestax
"Words have a funny way of trapping our minds on the way to our tongues but there are necessary means even in this multi-media age for attempting to come to grasps with some of the inarticulate maybe even inarticulable things that we're feeling".
I believe she's admitting that she really doesn't know a damn thing and is insecure of this fact.This is one mindless word drool of a speech, but I digress.
"Within the context of a society that we perceive -- now we can talk about reality, and I would like to talk about reality sometime,(Oh right, I bet she would) authentic reality, inauthentic reality, and what we have to accept of what we see -- but our perception of it is that it hovers often between the possibility of disaster and the potentiality for imaginatively responding to men's needs".
What??? I'm not sure what she's saying; did she know what she was saying? This is "Pure Gobbledy-Gook" all the way around.What does this wretched woman know about reality, except in relation to Manipulating other peoples reality,hmmm? MAY VINCE FOSTER R.I.P.
93
posted on
02/17/2003 10:41:32 AM PST
by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug , Holier-Than-Thou Socialist.)
To: Liz
Is this the much waited for Commencement Speech?
I find it intriguing. The woman is a walking contradiction. She married a man that was opposite everything she believed. A womanizer, untrustworthy, disrespectful, and lacking any integrity.
She appears to hate the fact that men ruled the world, and yet had to submit to the leadership of her husband to accomplish her goals.
Which now begs the question, which will destroy the other first?
94
posted on
02/17/2003 11:11:01 AM PST
by
swheats
To: swheats
Is this the much waited for (Hillary) Commencement Speech? According to recent First Lady biographers, this speech got Hillary's picture in Life magazine, which, at the time, I believe was considered a big deal.
95
posted on
02/17/2003 11:55:26 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Pagey
....."responding to men's needs".......
Yeah, that oughta sit well with FemiNazis.
96
posted on
02/17/2003 11:56:57 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Brian Allen
Wow!
97
posted on
02/17/2003 1:52:51 PM PST
by
cavtrooper21
(Why walk when you can ride?)
To: Liz
Intelligent? Absolutely not .... Hitlery and Bill's cunning political instincts - wrongly perceived as intelligence - have served them well. These two connivers have never had an unscripted moment in their entire lives.
I would love to have the chance to be a moderator at a debate and give her what she thinks are the questions -- real softball questions.
Then I would show no mercy on her, announcing like a coffee commericial, "Ma'am, did you know that those are not the real questions?"
It would then be like Chris Farley on SNL reacting to the coffee switch.
98
posted on
02/17/2003 2:19:04 PM PST
by
scott7278
(Peace had it's chance, now it's bombs away!)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Thanks for that info...appreciate it. Oh yeah, she's the smartest woman in the world allright. Hah,heh,heh...
To: buffyt
I think I might be tempted to choose Demi over Hillary, just from a purely testosterone point of view.....
100
posted on
02/17/2003 3:28:48 PM PST
by
cavtrooper21
(Why walk when you can ride?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson