Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US hits ballistic missile system in southern Iraq
Jerusalem Post ^ | 2-11-03 | AP via jpost

Posted on 02/11/2003 2:37:27 PM PST by cookcounty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: JackRyanCIA
Jihad Joe!! LOL!
41 posted on 02/11/2003 3:11:56 PM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
>>>..." I'm not sure anything else the Iraqis have in their arsenal would be considered "ballistic missles."

Scuds are ballistic missiles.

They are a particular type, but we had just as well call them that as anything else. They have variations of these that are called by different names.

42 posted on 02/11/2003 3:17:16 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
US, UK Jets Attack Iraqi Battlefield Missile Site
34 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Aircraft taking part in U.S.-British patrols attacked an Iraqi battlefield missile system in southern Iraq on Tuesday in an unusual response to Iraqi threats against the air patrols, the U.S. military said.

A spokesman for the U.S. military's Central Command in Tampa, Florida, told Reuters he did not know whether the mobile missile, located in a southern "no-fly" zone near Basra, was an Iraqi Scud. But he said it was a surface-to-surface missile.

U.S. and British jets have been increasingly attacking Iraqi air defense missiles, radars and communications for months. But strikes against ground attack tactical missiles are rare and Marine Corps Maj. Brad Lowell, a Central Command spokesman, noted that aircraft last attacked a surface-to-ship missile system near Basra on Sept. 6 of last year.

The Central Command announcement said that the jets used precision guided weapons "to target an Iraqi military surface-to-surface missile system" near Basra, about 245 miles southeast of the capital, Baghdad. Lowell said all aircraft departed the area safely and target damage was being studied.

43 posted on 02/11/2003 3:34:55 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
I call this loosening up the infrastructure before we send in the heavy hitters.
44 posted on 02/11/2003 3:39:21 PM PST by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)
Ballistic missles have guidence systems,do the scuds have these?I thought scuds were more like point and shoot,using elevation and deflction guidance,somewhat like artillery,only rocket powered.
45 posted on 02/11/2003 3:39:24 PM PST by eastforker (What goes around,comes around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
OK,I am the dummy,scuds are ballistic just like artillery,Had to go find webster,should do that next time before spouting off.Never mind.
46 posted on 02/11/2003 3:42:42 PM PST by eastforker (What goes around,comes around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: knak
So what were we supposed to do, wait until they were launched? That is Vietnam thinking. Let the Soviets unload their ships, the NVA store the SAMs in the open, and only when actually launched at a plane could our pilots strike the site that launched. Ha. If we see it, kill it!
47 posted on 02/11/2003 3:47:14 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
I want to obtain that book. Thanks for the tip/info.
48 posted on 02/11/2003 3:52:04 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
He's allowed to have scuds with a range of 150 miles or less. How you tell the range by looking at it, I don't know. Bombs away!
49 posted on 02/11/2003 3:53:05 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
Lets get this done and overwith, and get on to Iran or NK.
50 posted on 02/11/2003 3:53:18 PM PST by uncbuck (Sen Lawyers, Guns and Money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
If you can assume that the launcher was mobile and was not giving any sort of radar signature at the time, what kind of "precision guided" munition would have been involved?

Is this our way of letting the bad guys know we have people on the ground?

51 posted on 02/11/2003 3:59:35 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
The statement said the Iraqis had moved the missile system into the southern no-fly zone.

Was Saddam trying for a little preemption himself? Look for signs of chem/bio casualties among the local Shiites in the area.

52 posted on 02/11/2003 3:59:38 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
Iraq has not succeeded in downing a piloted plane over either no-fly zone.

Desert Storm 2 will be the shortest war in history.
53 posted on 02/11/2003 4:03:01 PM PST by ffusco (sempre ragione)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
Ballistic missles have guidence systems,do the scuds have these?

Even the old Nazi V-2s had guidance. The Scuds are really only slightly upgraded V-2s anyway, so they probably have similar guidance. Actually Guided missles have guidance, ballistic missles may, or may not, but if they do, it's only during the powered portion of the flight, from there on they are ballistic. (ICBMs and SLBMs give lie to this if they have a "post boost" vehicle, which sends the warhead(s) on their way, but adjusts their trajectory somewhat after the main engines cut off). The SCUDs have nothing like that, their warheads don't even separate from the body of the missle. You get hit by the whole thing, if you get hit at all, they are notoriously inaccurate. When Saddam was shooting them at Israel, some of them missed and hit Jordan, the wrong *country*, and that from not very far away, as ballistic missle ranges go.

54 posted on 02/11/2003 4:07:06 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
"precision guided" munition would have been involved? A laser guided one, or a TV guided one, most likely. However, they aren't all that mobil, so once their location is determined, a quick change to the target coordinates of the GPS "guided" JDAM, and it would be "no more ballistic missle". Ballistic missles have no RF "signature", although they might have associated systems, communications for instance, that might have one, but intermittently.
55 posted on 02/11/2003 4:11:20 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
The statement said the Iraqis had moved the missile system into the southern no-fly zone

Or close enough. He He

56 posted on 02/11/2003 4:17:20 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
the north and south no-fly zones will already have been taken out

I have a feeling there are probably a very significant number of troops there also

57 posted on 02/11/2003 4:20:04 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
"He's allowed to have scuds with a range of 150 miles or less.

It's actually 150 kilometers or about 90 statute miles.

58 posted on 02/11/2003 4:25:19 PM PST by semaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I was kinda hoping for a Green Beret or maybe a Marine scout-sniper pointing a laser at it; there will probably be ample opportunity shortly.
59 posted on 02/11/2003 4:27:26 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
I guess it's better than 'Dud Scud' ;0)
60 posted on 02/11/2003 4:29:12 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (We've got, you know, armadillos in our trousers. I mean, it's really quite frightening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson