Skip to comments.
France Warns Against War, Hints at Veto
Reuters ^
Posted on 02/07/2003 8:44:22 AM PST by RCW2001
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: rbmillerjr
Need Help, I want to buy a credible book regarding Frances modern history No suggestions, but I bet when you read the part about their criticisms of the U.S. in Vietnam, beer will shoot out your nose.
41
posted on
02/07/2003 9:48:06 AM PST
by
Mr. Bird
To: JeeperFreeper
When dealing with the French you must realize that they only do things that are in their self-interest. Morality is not a factor.
If Iraq promised France access for the French state-controlled oil companies to the Iraqi oilfields if the they can stop a U.S. attack, the French would turn on the U.S. in a heartbeat.
To: mhking
Khan!
43
posted on
02/07/2003 9:49:58 AM PST
by
ffusco
(sempre ragione)
To: rbmillerjr
Not a complete history, but a book dealing with the Isreali bombing of the Iraqi nuclear reactor back in 1981.
Called "Bullseye One" (Don't have the author at hand)
It puts Chirac right in the mix, strong arming Frances'Atomic Commision to allow the sale of not only the reactor but the 95% PURE FUEL to go with it. Good read
44
posted on
02/07/2003 9:50:58 AM PST
by
Robe
To: Take Some Responsibility
>>Why does France not want to have their own vote upheld?<<
Perhaps there are some French machines, and some French material, lying in wait in Iraq to destroy a certain "shitty little country"?
To: RCW2001
Good news, actually. French diplomatic incompetence may will put an end to UN diplomatic incompetence. Nothing wrong with a "two-fer."
To: RCW2001
this is a false lead headline...I watched the presser and basically they called on Iraq to "get with the program" by 2-14
47
posted on
02/07/2003 9:53:41 AM PST
by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
To: CatoRenasci
>>I often wonder how much the decline in the characters of the French and Germans is a result of the destruction of their aristocracies<<
I think the genetic effects of the European War 1914-1945 were profound. Good point.
To: RCW2001
I'd never thought I'd see the day when France would burn their bridges so badly with any nation besides Britain. But they've done it. I doubt anyone in America is going to forget this treachery.
Regards, Ivan
49
posted on
02/07/2003 9:56:07 AM PST
by
MadIvan
To: RCW2001
"We haven't gone to the end, far from it...there is still an alternative to war," Chirac said after meeting Finnish Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen in Paris. "...par exemple, nous pourrions la reddition immobile, qui n'a pas été essayée encore ", Chirac continued. ("for example, we could still surrender, that has not been tried yet".)
50
posted on
02/07/2003 10:02:19 AM PST
by
Dan Day
To: MadIvan
The French are scum.
Rationally, they certainly are not our allies. I want to see Richard Perle's policy suggestion of containing them carried out. I have had it with those POS.
They put 99% of their international political capacity into thwarting US policies. If we put 5% of our political capital into containing them - we will be 99% effective. Then again, Senegal could likely do the same.
To: RCW2001
France is not an ally, it is an enemy. It is Saddam's ally.
52
posted on
02/07/2003 10:02:36 AM PST
by
tomahawk
To: RCW2001
France obviously is hiding something
53
posted on
02/07/2003 10:03:22 AM PST
by
smith288
("Don't worry about me. If something happens, I've just gone on higher.")
To: Dan Day
"Chirac continued. ("for example, we could still surrender, that has not been tried yet".)"
True in the context of this week.
To: Billthedrill
I'm far less concerned about the diplomatic damage to the UN, which is a corrupt and poorly-designed institution, than I am to the damage being done to NATO. That has been a useful and stabilizing tool in bringing eastern Europe into the Western fold.
It's entirely possible that a new alliance will have to be formed, leaving out France and Germany. What that would do to the EU is open to the imagination.
55
posted on
02/07/2003 10:04:06 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: RCW2001
"We haven't gone to the end, far from it...there is still an alternative to war,"
There is ALWAYS an alternative to war. It's never too late to surrender.
56
posted on
02/07/2003 10:05:53 AM PST
by
mlo
To: PhiKapMom
Looks like Blair got doublecrossed by the French Hey, Tony, take a number and wait in line for your turn.
57
posted on
02/07/2003 10:06:56 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: RCW2001
Those French are also concerned the American buildup in Guam! will cause the "mer de feu" in Seoul. It's been a while, but didn't the decay of the West begin in France about the middle of the 19th century? Of course, nobody can do decadence like the French.
To: wizardoz
I suspect that Dubya's people are behind the scenes warning the French that the invasion
is going to happen, and if they veto the UN resolution then there will be an active investigation (as opposed to what is bound to turn up in the normal course of affairs) to expose how much of Saddam's WMD machinery carries the "MADE IN FRANCE" label.
A game of "chicken", indeed....
59
posted on
02/07/2003 10:09:31 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: RCW2001
Oh, gosh. The French spectator walked out of the theater? Oh, well, on with the show!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson