Posted on 02/07/2003 4:24:38 AM PST by kattracks
Sure. But, 'fisting gets a bad rap'? For teenagers?
Personally, I think the Gay Goon Squad planted the question through a stooge, although regrettably that cannot be proven.
They gave the wrong answer, anyway. The right answer is "Fisting is a vile, profoundly sick, septic, sensitive tissue tearing, demeaning and shameful behavior that no young man or woman should ever be sujected to or allow him or herself to be subjected to."
The whacky State of Massachussets and its Perversion General may have decided the "crime" was that a concerned parent taped the Gay Goon Squad as it strived in public facilities (in which the name of God may not be raised) to undermine and destroy the morals and health of the attendees. The final chapter hasn't been written yet. The final judgment is pending, and when it falls it will fall hard indeed.
Actually, that's likely - see reply 257
Fisting is out of context and sensationalization, why teach it in the first place? Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
How convoluted a homosexual’s or mad “gay’s” common sense becomes when justifying perversion. I guess it’s just part of the pathology.
Madg, you're not addressing the actual information that was recorded in the workshop. You, GLSEN, and every other pro-homosexual supporter have tried to desperately to convince everyone that the "queer sex" workshop was an anomaly. Yet, as I pointed out in reply 295, we clearly hear a representative from a homosexual organization that makes hundreds of presentations every year ( reply 257 ) saying that he, as a "guest speaker," discusses sexually explicit topics such as those covered in the Fistgate workshop in public middle schools.
As much as you'd like us to believe that this is "utterly transparent propaganda," the tape confirms that these discussions with minor children occur in public schools. The evidence presented leads us to believe that this occurs more often than the homosexual community will admit.
"No. I believe that a reasonably prudent person can see from the definitions above that sections 28, 29, and 31 could apply to the workshop in question. Why the DA or AG doesn't even bother to acknowledge Scott Whiteman's complaint and evidence is obviously a question of politics."
"No, it is NOT “obviously a question of politics,” it is obviously your own fantasy. You, like radical activist and lawbreaker Camenker, are trying to distract attention AWAY from Camenker and Whiteman’s illegal and unethical actions by pointing elsewhere and repeating: “But looky looky looky over THERE!”
I ask again, WHY are YOU so adverse to a request that the DA and/or the AG make an official and public ruling on Scott Whiteman's complaint? The complaint stated that that what the presenters discussed with minor children in that work shop could be considered obscene and harmful to minors under MGL. The DA has an eyewitness and evidence on tape, and as I have pointed out, Education Commissioner Driscoll's expert opnion ( 280 ) that the contents of the workshop "were of a prurient nature and not educational." In the workshop, Whiteman observed and heard material being discussed with minor children that could be considered obscene and harmful and had a civic duty to report it. Without the evidence on tape, do you actually think the workshop presenters would have admitted that this occurred?
"It’s not working, nor is it going to work… at least not with me. I’m immune to your “45-minutes of propaganda” tape because..."
YOU choose to ignore the facts.
"Any intelligent person that sees the names Camenker and Whiteman should immediately say to themselves..."
"These courageous men deserve our thanks and support for standing up to protect public school children."
"What they did was unethical, illegal, immoral, nefarious, and just plain NASTY."
According to MGL and Education Commissioner Driscoll, and the evidence we've heard on the tape, that certainly seems to be the case for the workshop presenters.
"... because your WHINING about..."
YOU have the nerve to accuse someone of whining? Just reread the littlediatribe you posted.
"Fantasies about conspiracies and your desire for distraction away from the very real and egregious actions of the “Camenker Gang” continue to demonstrate your inability to deal with this matter AS IT IS, not as YOU would like it to be."
It's quite obvious that you, the homosexual community, and your supporters want to vilify and destroy Camenker and Whiteman. The "matter," "AS IT IS," has not been resolved.
As quoted in State condemns 'gay' sex discussion:
"Faced with the irrefutable evidence of his employees' actions, David Driscoll, commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Education, admitted Tuesday:
"The participation of our staff in conversations with students about explicit issues of sexuality outside the realm of AIDS/HIV prevention was wrong. The workshops were of prurient nature, and not educational, and what we heard suggests that the discussion contributed absolutely nothing to the students' understanding of how to avoid AIDS and HIV."
( This same quote appeared in the Boston Herald on May 17, 2000 )
As we heard, the workshop presenters sure didn't address these issues slowly, carefully, and with great attention to accuracy and truth. Oh no, it was take it to the kids, full speed ahead!
Also see reply 280
(I will respond to the rest later!)
(more on this thread soon...)
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
|
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.