1 posted on
02/07/2003 12:15:12 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: kattracks
Please let her run..please please???
56 posted on
02/07/2003 12:36:46 PM PST by
RnMomof7
(God Bless America)
To: kattracks
MAKE OUR DAY...RUN HILLARY RUN
To: kattracks
"If she even let herself be talked about seriously, she'd be the one to beat among the Democrats and she could raise zillions of dollars. I can't figure out who in the bunch of them could beat her," said Quinnipiac pollster Maurice Carroll. NY pollster, perhaps?!!!!!!!!!!
To: kattracks
I hate to be the contrarian, but I think Hillary! would be the most formidable Dim candidate. She is an outstanding campaigner, sounding down right middle of the road. She ran lots better in upstate New York than anybody thought she would, and demographically that area is more like the Midwest than the Northeast. She would get back the part of the women's vote that Billy Jeff had but Gore lost.
Barring a disaster in Iraq, I still think Dubya wins, but Hillary! would give him a heck of a fight.
To: kattracks
Some have been known to call early polls and early pre-primary events that don't select delegates as "beauty contests".
I really hope they don't use that term this election cycle or I shall be violently ill. ;-)
65 posted on
02/07/2003 1:12:20 PM PST by
cgbg
To: kattracks
Boy are they scraping the bottom of the barrel.
To: kattracks
If Hillary runs in 2008 (I don't think she can wait that long to "rule the world") I am hoping the Republicans nominate Condi!
83 posted on
02/07/2003 1:52:17 PM PST by
canyon
To: kattracks
she can romp, stomp, chit and grovel, but she ain't ever gonna be president.
America will never trust her with the armed forces. period.
88 posted on
02/07/2003 2:08:23 PM PST by
The Wizard
(Demonrats are enemies of America)
To: kattracks
98 posted on
02/07/2003 2:45:30 PM PST by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: kattracks
Bring her on. We're going to have to beat her in '04 or '08. The more you see her the less you like her.
To: kattracks
Hillary would lie to NY? She promised them she'd finish her term.
PS...A vote for Hillary is a vote to put the discraced, impeached rapist back in the Whitehouse. Pass it around!
To: kattracks
Say, any serious bets on the starting date of the 'Listening Tour'?!
118 posted on
02/07/2003 7:50:00 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
(Someone left the cake out in the rain I dont think that I can take it coz it took so long to bake it)
To: kattracks
"WASHINGTON - A new poll says Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton could sweep the entire field of Democratic presidential candidates if she wanted to challenge President Bush in 2004 - fueling talk she's leaving the door open to doing just that. "
Which would mean possible victories in Washington, New Jersey and New York (city).
I hope she does run. Most of America hates her slimey marxist guts.
120 posted on
02/07/2003 7:53:18 PM PST by
Constitutional Patriot
(hillary is a marxist who wants to destroy our constitution.)
To: kattracks
Is it really that exciting? Clinton II? Can anyone imagine what her administration running the Department of Homeland Security would be like? The military? Is Cigar rationing on the horizon? Will WH interns need to be screened for having big mouths and a propensity for keeping stained blue dresses? Will Janet Reno be rehired to terrorize young 6 year olds seeking asylum? Will the VRWC saddle up and ride again?
123 posted on
02/07/2003 8:02:54 PM PST by
harpo11
(I Proudly Stand With My President and America's Brave Troops--God Bless)
To: kattracks
Hmmmm... I thought the words Hillary and romp would only be a headline in the magazine called 'The Advocate'. Or the National Enquirer. Silly me.
130 posted on
02/07/2003 9:00:21 PM PST by
rintense
(Go Get 'Em Dubya!)
To: kattracks
Remember her popping off about the electoral college after the election? If that were not in place, she would win.
That old bat would motivate the worst in me. I'm no Busbot, but that vote is a no brainer.
To: kattracks
I remember my wife and I in Washington DC holding our sign which said:
No More Clinton/Gore
Treason is the Reason
WWW.FreeRepublic.com
And that is a good reason not to have Hildebeast as President! Grassontop
135 posted on
02/07/2003 9:31:43 PM PST by
Grassontop
(Liberals are a funeral waiting to happen! Saddam would help them to their graves with a smile!)
To: kattracks
At Bush's State of the Union speech, she took care to plunk herself down in prime camera angle - second row, just behind the Joint Chiefs of Staff. While this is entirely ( and manipulatively) true,after he completed his speech, it was probably only a minute and a half until George W. Bush had walked around to the front and shook all of the Chiefs of Staffs hands and SHE WAS NOWHERE IN SIGHT!!!Piece of Garbage that she is, she sure couldn't be seen shaking his hand,could she?Taking it a step further---After the Presidents address shortly after 9/11, even Tom Daschle intentionally blocked/stood in the way of GWB going across the front--- he wanted/ needed that scene to be caught on film for posterity.But not Senator Rotten,mmm hmmm, she left the building.A truly wretched,partisan hack.
144 posted on
02/10/2003 3:25:18 PM PST by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug , Holier-Than-Thou Socialist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson