Skip to comments.
TONIGHT ON THE O'Reilly FACTOR HE WILL BE BASHING THE ANTI-AMERICANS THE RUSH HATERS
THE INTERNET
| 2/3/2003
| TLBSHOW
Posted on 02/03/2003 5:00:33 PM PST by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-254 next last
To: visualops
SM: That was problem.We get signal!
To: visualops
SM: Yes he has said that. Go and look at our website TBTM and have a good look at it. We?ve got information there. What a moron. I can post a "transcript" online claiming Rush said X, Y or Z. Doesn't mean it's true. Pony up the audio or shut up, Stimpy.
To: Doctor Raoul
Thanks so much for that list!
So these are the liberal radio talk show hosts that "can't get on the radio because Rush is on just about every station on the radio". But they're on the radio. OK, I get it now... NOT!
203
posted on
02/03/2003 9:53:25 PM PST
by
nutmeg
To: Cultural Jihad
Love it! That is my favorite Fawlty Towers.... even more than "The Germans".
To: I still care
They each had memorable scenes in them, no? ;)
To: CFC__VRWC
Enjoy my correspondence last week with OVERSTOCK.com
Subj: Re: Rush Limbaugh Show Date: 1/31/2003 8:02:47 PM Eastern Standard Time From: info@overstock.com To: ******@aol.com Sent from the Internet (Details)
Dear Lisa,
I appreciate you sharing your thoughts and concerns. We have and continue to hear from concerned customers such as yourself. We certainly appreciate that so many took the time to offer their feedback. Unfortunately, due to an overwhelmingly negative response from our customers, we have respectfully requested that our banners be removed.
Please be advised that we do not support, nor are we associated in any way with any political organization or opinion. Nor are we able to control what is posted on other sites.
Please keep us in mind for your online shopping needs.
Thank you,
Heather
www.Overstock.com >p> ******.com wrote:
It has come to my attention that you are no longer advertising with Rush Limbaugh.
Sadly, I will no longer be able to do business with your company.
Respectfully,
Lisa ****** 278 North *** Street **********, NY 11757
To: Timesink
see my post 206 from overstock last week....
I guess they have changed their tune LOL...sadly a bit too late for my pocketbook : )
To: alisasny
I guess they have changed their tune LOL...sadly a bit too late for my pocketbook : )Thanks for the ping. I shan't be shopping there until I see that the banners remain up on the Rush site for an extended period of time.
To: TLBSHOW
How old do you think Michael is? He looks to me like he is in his early 40s or late 30s. Why does this matter? Because he is described as being a Vietnam Veteran. The last American troops were pulled out of Vietnam in 1973. Even if Stinson were 45 that would make him just 15 years old in 1973, much to young to be in the service. Does anybody out there have solid info as to how old Michael Stinson is?
209
posted on
02/04/2003 2:24:15 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Redundancy Can Be Quite Catchy As Well As Contagious)
To: Tall_Texan
looks like John Lennon
My thoughts too, a definite wannabe that Stinson.
To: Timesink
I haven't finished looking into it (to even verify validity), but a very brief search turned up one reference that stated the 'bone in the nose' comment was made in the 70's.
So, even if it's true, this is 30 year old news.
Not only are the liberal losers grasping at straws, they are really really old straws!
To: visualops
I haven't finished looking into it (to even verify validity), but a very brief search turned up one reference that stated the 'bone in the nose' comment was made in the 70's. Rush's show didn't start until 1988.
212
posted on
02/04/2003 3:48:29 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Redundancy Can Be Quite Catchy As Well As Contagious)
To: TLBSHOW
BTTT!!!!!!
213
posted on
02/04/2003 4:25:00 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: Just mythoughts
But what I did not learn is what is the big exposure Oreilly has planned for the "right" later this weekI believe that was intentional. In tv land they want to make ya hurry up & wait. Build up the excitement so to speak.
There are many things I dispute from his point of view.
That's fine, you're free to do so.However, how can you dispute his point of view when rooted in absolute fact? Is it because you disagree from a moral stand point?
214
posted on
02/04/2003 5:10:07 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: ez
Well, some of these protesters honored their country by serving in the military."
Benedict Arnold and Scott Ritter also served in the military.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
....And Bill Clinton was president. I think more people are realizing that Clinton is the modern day Benedict Arnold.
Lennie
215
posted on
02/04/2003 5:20:06 AM PST
by
Lennie
To: TLBSHOW
If this dork is an example of those that will boycot sponsers, well, I have to say he and his ilk do not seem the sort to have much buying power anyway. All extra cash scraped together obviously goes for drugs and certainly not personal grooming or fixing up that house.
It is our kind that has buying power and exercises it. I don't have time to listen to Rush or know who his sponsers are, but it would be fun to visit them and purchase something and inform the cashier or manager that this purchase is in support of Rush.
To: TLBSHOW
O'Reilly is a scumbag whose show is planned around the hot topic of the day. He is like silver to Rush's gold. The fortunes of talk radio's most popular host are tied to billyboy's success.
To: alisasny
To: blam
Stinson is a long haired hippy looking freak. I half expected O'reilly to end the interview with "Party on , Garth.". What O'reilly could have done is read some of the posts at DUh where the guy hangs out. Talk about "hate-speech".
219
posted on
02/04/2003 5:49:29 AM PST
by
techcor
To: justshe
The thing that scares me about this jerk and others like him is the way they throw around the term "hate speech" as if categorizing anything they don't like in this way makes it an exception to the right of free speech. What scares me even more is when a conservative responds as though it were true. We'd better nip that in the bud before it becomes the next "word" that has us cowering the way the "racism" word does now. Allowing liberals to use these words as weapons against us is a very bad thing. We either have freedom of speech or we don't, and if we do, sometimes people will say things that are interpreted by others as hate. Is this something new? Of course not. Is hate itself a crime? NO! Besides, it isn't hate that the liberals are trying to silence; it is truth. There is no one who is more full of hate than the liberals/socialists and what they hate the most is truth.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-254 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson