Albanians charged with terrorism in Kosovo

b92.net ^ | February 3, 2003 | FoNet

[kosta50]

Re: #40 Library "science" consisting of copying paragraphs is not indicative of understanding of the subject, which is obvious in your case.

You may look up a dictionary definition of a massacre such as "the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty..." and contrast it with the definition of a war such as " state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations."

In case you didn't notice, your source is describing normal medieval wars which hardly qualify as massacres. Duh!

Never mind that you are lumping Slavonic language in your post, Cyrillic alphabet, and a whole lot of erroneous information (that's right: your source is erroneous and misleading), all that in your feeble attempt to "prove" massacres. What a joke!

I think there is a sports page that would very much appreciate your input.

[a_Turk]

Sorry. The Geneva convention was concocted by balkan folks hundreds of years ago, just never recognized by anyone else...

[a_Turk]

The word "massacre" has 2 different senses:

Noun: The savage and excessive killing of many people.

Verb: Kill a large number of people indiscriminately.

[branicap]

Dear friends,why is it that obviously intelligent people,when you point out their mistake,post some irelevant link or article, to cover their mistake or ,shall we say,malice??

Dear Turk,no,I don`t live in Nebraska,I live in London ,UK.

Secondly,my previous post to you was absolutely,correct.Your reply,is absolutely,of the mark.

I belive,that if you don`t understand the difference betwen "massacre" and regular "war-warfare" than you shouldn`t offer your version of history.If you don`t understand what I mean,read Kosta`s post,maybe you`ll understand.As usuall,Kosta was quicker in his reply than me.!

It must be the time difference,not Kosta`s brains!LOL

As I said before,Kosta you`re a gem on the FR!

So,Turk,do you understand a "legall" difference between Viatnam War ,in general,and,Mi Lai massacre in particular?You do?Good.

Now,let`s not play games any more:I`ve been on FR a long time now,and I know majority of players,including you.That means,that your post about "Balkanoids" has nothing to do with Gots and Celts but with more recent history,ok?I have no animosity against you,I just wanted to explain to you and some others who don`t have a clue about Balkans,that BS history is just a lie,no metter how many times you repeat it!Now,you can reply with "Poo on you,sir" ,but,before you do that,can you just tell us all who had an upper hand in Balkans for the 500 years?After all,it was you who said "who was stronger,massacred the others",right?

The result of those 500+ years still shake Balkans in general.

Bujrum,komshi!