Skip to comments.
DEM FUND-RAISER, CLINTON OVERNIGHTER PROBED: Pension board letters probed
Philadelphia Inquirer ^
| Feb. 02, 2003
| Joseph Tanfani, Craig R. McCoy and Mark Fazlollah
Posted on 02/02/2003 9:03:56 AM PST by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
City Controller Jonathan A. Saidel assured a judge "under penalty of perjury" that he knew of no campaign donations from a Philadelphia law firm - even though the firm was among the nation's top Democratic donors, and its lawyers had given to Saidel's campaigns. Five days later, on Nov. 29, 1999, Saidel and a top aide to then-Mayor Ed Rendell sent a new letter attempting to correct their first one. The Nov. 24 letter was written just days before Saidel left on a trip to Israel, said his attorney, James Eisenhower 3d. In the second letter, sent Nov. 29, Saidel and Nadol told Alsup that the first letter had a sentence "incorrectly typed."
![](http://wtv.re-lab.net/mixer/k/Clinton.gif)
Yeah, sure. Like I said, "It all depends on what the meaning of "is" is.
1
posted on
02/02/2003 9:03:56 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
They will get away with it, but we must STILL report on it!
2
posted on
02/02/2003 9:11:08 AM PST
by
timestax
To: Liz
Our children will be digging out the dirt on these people when we are dead and gone.
but later said an omission had created a misstatement.
*Rolling my eyes*
3
posted on
02/02/2003 9:19:41 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
The conniving Clinton's dirt pile is sky-high.
4
posted on
02/02/2003 9:38:23 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Grampa Dave
Kali Dims east coast stench.
5
posted on
02/02/2003 9:39:40 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
There's nothing Democratic about the Democrat party. You should refer to them as the Democrat Party, not the Democratic party.
6
posted on
02/02/2003 9:50:17 AM PST
by
jimkress
To: Liz
There's nothing Democratic about the Democrat party. You should refer to them as the Democrat Party, not the Democratic party.
7
posted on
02/02/2003 10:00:13 AM PST
by
jimkress
To: Liz
This is not the first time Slimey Saidel has been involved in mischief. Of course, nothing ever became of it in 'rat infested Philly. He just keeps getting re-elected by the robot Philly voters.
From an few year old article:
"The Inquirer reported that the former campaign treasurer and girlfriend of City Controller Jonathan Saidel was charged last week with conspiring with Saidel to steal $36,000 from his reelection fund, in part to help her buy an expensive new house.
A state grand jury alleged that Diana L. Roca, 40, also conspired with Saidel, the financial watchdog of city government, to make false statements in campaign expense reports filed with the state last year and in 1995. The 27-page grand jury presentment released contends that $5,000 of the $36,000 payment to Roca was indirectly used to pay Saidel's city taxes in 1996 because he lacked the money to do so himself.
To: Liz
Their words are now at the center of an FBI investigation that produced a wave of grand-jury subpoenas last week. Good news, I guess, but the feds, led by AG Ashcroft have demonstrated no interest, not a bit, in seeing justice done in matters of government corruption.
9
posted on
02/02/2003 10:08:47 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
(Yes, it is pretty bold talk......)
To: Liz
Maybe this is why the state Repubs here in PA don't seem so fired up about Rendell being governor: he has a lot of baggage which will trickle out over his term and reduce his power, plus the Repubs did keep both state houses.
10
posted on
02/02/2003 10:10:04 AM PST
by
ikka
To: Mo1
Philly
Politics
PING !! So9
11
posted on
02/02/2003 10:25:47 AM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: jimkress
WhoooHoooo! That's what I've been saying for the last couple of years.
Besides, they are never referred to as the "democratics", but as the democrats. Sooooo, the name of the party is Democrat Party not democratic party.
While I have time on my hands, I may start a writing campaign - using email to all media. Hmmmm??
12
posted on
02/02/2003 10:50:51 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
( Syracuse where are you?)
To: Liz
[City officials swore they knew of no donors in a law firm that they employed, but later said an omission had created a misstatement.]
Do you think that in tha above styatement, they were trying to distance themselves from the fact that the "created mistatement" was actually a deceit by omission (e.g. a lie) on their part? Naaaah.
To: Liz
I cringed when I saw "Clinton", "overnighter", and "probed" in the same sentence.
To: timestax
when ya think about it, the only person to date
to stop the Clinton's on anything was Kathleen Harris
of Florida fame. Harris stood up from start to FINISH.
...name just one other......
To: Liz
So many crimes and lies I can't keep up. The slime gave a pep rally talk to the DNC in the Pa. mountains somewhere, they paid for his and his security entourage's night.
This very meeting musta made the earth spin and all the demons from hell went in a frenzy in the air.
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
![](http://spuckler.com/images/mattel/mattel1990tv.gif
)
Now in syndication: Dumbocrats hold a pep rally for the Dim party faithful.
17
posted on
02/02/2003 1:13:21 PM PST
by
Liz
To: Jeff Chandler
Makes sense to me. After all, the perv prez was holed up in the WH with yuk Hitlery and needed some diversion.
Why do you think he held all those coffees? For the money? Heck no.
18
posted on
02/02/2003 1:15:14 PM PST
by
Liz
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Do I think ....they were trying to distance themselves from the fact that the "created mistatement" was actually a deceit by omission (e.g. a lie) on their part? I think they were trying to finesse a falsity by inventing a lie to cover the ommission of truth by a prevarication.
19
posted on
02/02/2003 1:18:13 PM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
DEM FUND-RAISER, CLINTON OVERNIGHTER PROBEDSo now Clinton is sticking "it" to his own people, eh?
Sicko.
20
posted on
02/02/2003 1:24:34 PM PST
by
A2J
(If all else fails, blame it on someone else.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson