THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER: Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992
BUMP!
NEW AUDIO! Hear the Bill Bennett epilogue.
Posted on 01/29/2003 8:02:32 AM PST by Mia T
THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER: Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992
BUMP!
NEW AUDIO! Hear the Bill Bennett epilogue.
The Burden of Proof is on Bill Clinton to prove that he didn't order the Waco Massacre, and to prove he didn't RAPE multiple women, and to prove he didn't COMMIT TREASON in selling out to the North Koreans and CommieChinese Tyrants Thugs!! Bill Clinton has broken the LAW on literally hundreds or thousands of FELONIOUS Occasions and the Burden of Proof as to why he should or should not be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law is ALL OF OURS!!
What Say YOU, RonF?! Are Bill Clinton and his SKANKY Butt-Ugly Wife above and beyond the laws that impact you and I?!
RonF, you look soooo cute in those kneepads and that bib and that blue dress...MUD
Better sue the school who awarded you your JD...
I was under this obviously misguided impression that one was presumed innocent until proven guilty in a trial by a jury.
IMHO, this is one reason why Bill Clinton has not been tried when a regular person would have been. To make the case, the prosecution would have to introduce information which would open the door to the defense making national secrets public. Like the shoe-bomber case only much more so.
There is also the political issue. If the actions were in any way discretionary and we prosecute Clinton, then down the road, some Democrat administration would prosecute Dubya for what they consider to be bad policy decisions.
I personally have no clue either way, and in any case I'm more worried about the policy decisions of the sitting President, not any of the previous ones. But the accusation at hand would mean that the Clintons are currently reaching into my pocket unjustifiably, so it's worthy of attention.
So, I wouldn't be so quick to use any form of 'urban legend' as the very last word on the subject. Usually something concerning Hillary has a long history on this site. And sometimes it would be better to research what is contained in our search engine and archives rather than rely on an 'urban legend' outfit.
If Clinton had not been President, I’m very confident he would have been prosecuted for numerous allegations, which I have documented on the Downside Legacy.
I don’t think there is any hope he will ever be prosecuted for what was done in Arkansas or for the above evidently fraudulent activity. That does not however mean it will not be dealt with.
IMHO, as soon as Gore gave up on the recount - the intelligence community was at work putting Clinton in a box. His aspirations of a super fancy office were dashed. He lost credibility and confidence with the money and power brokers as details of his pardons (esp Rich) were leaked to the press. He has been scratching and clawing for any relevance to this day.
In his worldview that may be a fate worse than death. And the same type of thing may await Hillary if she strays from the purely political arena.
IMHO, rogue Presidents must be contained in this way because of foreign policy (prestige) national security and public confidence - the public is too nervous. In other words, I predict that if the intelligence community uncovers hard evidence of treason at the highest levels of government, there would not be a defendant to put on trial.
The remark "Don't give Dubya a power you wouldn't want to see President Kerry have" is very important. That’s why I personally would like to see invasive, emergency powers to fight terror have a built-in sunset date with recourse.
Which merely provides telling evidence of your inferior intellect.
|
by Mia T, 1-10-03 |
|||
|
|||
|
The apparent nonappearance of hillary clinton at the Ron Brown funeral should be even more interesting to James Woods than her failure to attend the 9/11 funerals. To be fair, it is perfectly understandable that hillary clinton would choose not to attend the funeral of the man who went down alone notwithstanding his threat to the contrary that would have sent her to the slammer... RON BROWN (DAYS BEFORE HIS DEATH) TO BILL CLINTON RON BROWN TO NOLANDA HILL [A]t the time of his death Ron Brown was under investigation by an independent counsel, and was likely to be indicted. According to his business partner and confidant, Nolanda Hill, Brown had told President Clinton days before he was asked unexpectedly to travel to Croatia that he would negotiate a plea agreement with the independent counsel, which would entail telling what he knew about alleged illegalities in the Clinton-Gore Administration. Clinton, according to Brown, responded badly. For the inescapable logic of the case, see A LEGACY OF LYNCHING. Ron Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave Clearly, Ron Brown was used by the clintons, (Brown: "I'm doing my chores for Hillary Clinton.")...and then, just when he was about to finger the clintons and cut a deal with the Justice Dept. (Brown to clinton: "I will not go down alone.")...he was lynched forthwith by the lovely couple. clinton hush money passed flagrante delicto... Jesse Jackson and the Black Caucus apparently know full well that Brown was lynched by the clintons. Jackson et al. demanded that Brown's death be investigated, demanded that Brown's body be exhumed...that is, until the clintons bought them off... NOTE: As is usually the case, the clintons benefit from the wacko inconceivability of this charge, (wacko magnitude approximately equal to that of the Broaddrick rape allegation). But let's take a look at the rape allegation. When the evidence in the Ford Building was examined, even moderates like Christopher Shays concluded that clinton did rape Broaddrick. (Unfortunately for the country, Shays then went on to conclude that a rapist can be a fit president. Any cognitive dissonance Shays may have experienced rendering that verdict was no doubt assuaged by the political plum clinton had given Mrs. (Betsi) Shays...) There is a book/fame for any jounalist who cracks the Ron Brown case...If the government doesn't have the guts to pursue this, some enterprising freelancer will. There is no statute of limitations for murder...or for Woodward-Bernstein wannabes.
|
|
|
PRENUP/POST-RAPE SENATE SEAT  DESIGNATED DEMOCRAT ATTACK DOG
BUMP! |
Nothing but a RedHerring...we know Slick Willie is a Perjuror, a Racist, a sexual Harrasser, a Pervert, a Conspirator to Mass-Murderer, a Conspirator to MultipleMini-Murders, a Tyrant, and a SERIAL RAPIST!! This much we know to be FACT!! And you are trying to convince me that the reason we don't go after William Jefferson Blythe Clinton fer his BLATANT TREASON is because we're worried about National Security?! LOL...that is utter NONSENSE, my Good and Wise FRiend!!
"There is also the political issue. If the actions were in any way discretionary and we prosecute Clinton, then down the road, some Democrat administration would prosecute Dubya for what they consider to be bad policy decisions."
Let the RATS try...there is ONLY the political issue, IMHO, and that is why we must rid the Department of Justice of the feckless and spineless John Ashcroft!!
Rudy Guiliani Fer Attorney General...NOW!!!
FReegards...MUD
"What Say YOU, RonF?! Are Bill Clinton and his SKANKY Butt-Ugly Wife above and beyond the laws that impact you and I?!"
MUD
Unfortunately, you ain't ever going to be able to prove it in a court of law--criminals with law degrees tend to be the most successful of the criminal class, because every move they make is executed with an eye to making sure that they can't be prosecuted for that move.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
