Skip to comments.
CHEW ON THIS [Hitchens to peaceniks]
TheStranger.com via Andrew Sullivan ^
| January 19, 2003
| Christopher Hitchens
Posted on 01/19/2003 7:29:37 AM PST by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
The Unafraid addresses the Unwashed.
1
posted on
01/19/2003 7:29:37 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: All
2
posted on
01/19/2003 7:31:38 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Support Free Republic
Hitchens goes it alone, just like his PM, Blair....
Bravo
To: aculeus
p>He's breathing fire.
Can I have some of what he ate?
4
posted on
01/19/2003 7:42:16 AM PST
by
PokeyJoe
(If you got beef let the whole world know it . . .)
To: prognostigaator; All
Like Tony Blair, that rarity of rarities: a leftist with brains and a soul. I do not agree with every word, but boy are those words awesome to read.
5
posted on
01/19/2003 7:48:34 AM PST
by
friendly
To: aculeus
Surely a "peace movement" with any principles should be demanding that the United States not abandon them again. I like to think I could picture a mass picket in Seattle, offering solidarity with Kurdistan against a government of fascistic repression, and opposing any attempt to sell out the Kurds for reasons of realpolitik. Instead, there is a self-satisfied isolationism to be found, which seems to desire mainly a quiet life for Americans.Wish I could fit THAT on a bumper sticker.
6
posted on
01/19/2003 7:50:40 AM PST
by
wizardoz
To: aculeus
While we're at it, kudos to The Stranger -- which looks to be an alternative paper for Seattle -- for publishing something that much of their staff and readership probably doesn't want to hear.
To: nutmeg
bump to read later
8
posted on
01/19/2003 7:53:28 AM PST
by
nutmeg
To: aculeus
That is just a great article. Hard to believe the guy is a socialist. It's true that the peaceniks and the left are taking positions that, by default, ally them with the terrorists, and all their hatred and evil.
However, I would like to know what Hitchens means by "reaction" and "reactionary." Maybe someone can enlighten me?
9
posted on
01/19/2003 7:57:35 AM PST
by
Sam Cree
To: aculeus
My list of bookmarks is getting ridiculously long. But, I can't resist. Bookmarked.
Bravo.
10
posted on
01/19/2003 7:58:58 AM PST
by
Skooz
($ This space for rent--Your ad here $)
To: Sam Cree
It must be some leftist thing. Maybe he's speaking in "code" to his fellow leftists.
11
posted on
01/19/2003 7:59:07 AM PST
by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: nutmeg
Remember, Hitchens has contacts in Washington. Those contacts probably told him that the "Peace" movement would have egg on its face when we started finding stuff like mass graves.
Hitchens is writing this way for a reason.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
12
posted on
01/19/2003 8:01:49 AM PST
by
section9
(Ronald Must Die...)
To: section9
Who's Ronald?
13
posted on
01/19/2003 8:03:05 AM PST
by
Skooz
($ This space for rent--Your ad here $)
To: prognostigaator
There are at least three well-established reasons to favor what is euphemistically termed "regime change" in Iraq. The first is the flouting by Saddam Hussein of every known law on genocide and human rights... The liars and haters on the Left can't "go there" because deep in the heart of hearts, this is what they would do themselves in order to implement their sick fantasies of power and control. This is the time-proven method used to eliminate opposition, crush resistance and stifle freedom. Genocide and atrocity are what the Left is all about, once their arguments have been boiled to down to their essentials.
14
posted on
01/19/2003 8:03:43 AM PST
by
Noumenon
To: Skooz
"Ronald" is none other than Ronald McDonald, who must die.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
15
posted on
01/19/2003 8:04:25 AM PST
by
section9
(Ronald Must Die...)
To: dighton; general_re; hellinahandcart; BlueLancer; Poohbah
The United States finds itself at war with the forces of reaction. Sunday morning clarity ping.
16
posted on
01/19/2003 8:07:02 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: aculeus
Christopher Hitchens is a columnist!
17
posted on
01/19/2003 8:07:17 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(truth isn't a four letter word)
To: G.Mason
I've always kind of liked the old limey socialist, back to when he used to be on Crossfire (1985). No matter the subject, I would always watch it when he was a guest.
18
posted on
01/19/2003 8:10:35 AM PST
by
Skooz
($ This space for rent--Your ad here $)
To: Sam Cree
He is a hard man to pin down. I think he's honest with himself most of the time. I debated him on Kosovo and he is willing to open his mind more than most columnist. I doubt we will be seeing him talk about this article on any of the talking head shows.
To: Sam Cree
I would like to know what Hitchens means by "reaction" and "reactionary." Maybe someone can enlighten me?
The socialists (including, amazingly enough, Hitchens) believe in a future world where we all will love each other and live in socialist bliss. Anything that gets in the way of that socialist dream is "reactionary".
Hitchen's analysis is correct as usual. Fundamentalist Islam would create a world where we would all worship Allah or die in a prison camp under some sort of Islamic theocracy of, by and for the ruling elite of Islamic clerics.
Hitchens is a fascinating character. He is a Leftist with a brain.
They are rare jewels indeed!
20
posted on
01/19/2003 8:16:58 AM PST
by
cgbg
(AQ must have been asleep yesterday. They failed to attack a large crowd of decadent heathens. ;-))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson