Skip to comments.
Critic slams ABC over 'bias' - Calls report of president's U. of Mich. decision 'personal attack'
WorldNetDaily ^
| January 17, 2003
Posted on 01/18/2003 6:17:32 AM PST by Timesink
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: exit82
Not only that but you have to be the right type of black congressman... J C Watts tried to join them and they rejected him...
21
posted on
01/18/2003 8:59:33 AM PST
by
marajade
To: TLBSHOW
"Rush has a 80 million audience..."
20 mil...
22
posted on
01/18/2003 9:00:37 AM PST
by
marajade
To: Timesink
Considering race "as a factor" for admission is not an issue, really. After all, colleges consider the children of alumni "as a factor" for admission.
The problem is quotas. The problem is artificially adding "points" to admission scoring based on race alone. This introduces discrimination of blacks and hispanics over whites and asians. Its wrong, and hopefully the Supreme Court will do more than produce a narrowly focused decision. They now have an opportunity to resolve some issues.
To: dark_lord
After all, colleges consider the children of alumni "as a factor" for admission.I'd be ecstatic to see colleges put a stop to that as well.
24
posted on
01/18/2003 9:31:06 AM PST
by
Timesink
(Poodle: The Other White Meat)
To: Timesink
I'd be ecstatic to see colleges put a stop to that as well.
We must be talking about state colleges and not private colleges.
A private college could elect to allow the children of hindu elephant herders to be preferred if they so wish. They are PRIVATE!!
A publicly funded college, on the other hand, must permit ANY taxpayer to have equal access. If they get my money, then I should have some chance of attending. The best way to do it is probably by lottery of ALL who are fully qualified. (Notice that I didn't say BEST qualified.)
They can enable the BEST QUALIFIED to jump the lottery by providing them scholarships for academics, music, sports, whatever.
Then put the rest in a hat and draw names. Can't get more fair than that.
25
posted on
01/18/2003 9:36:46 AM PST
by
xzins
(Argue 'cause arguing is fun; not 'cause truth is impt)
To: Timesink
I have yet to hear any news media reporting that the 14th Amendment proscribes discrimination on the basis of race, period. This political "debate" should be about the repeal of the 14th, except that our pesky Constitution obstructs social planners.
The SCOTUS has only one ruling, aka reiteration, to make: our Constitution as amended forbids any and all race based discrimination.
To: Support Free Republic
"The king and queen of the free ride" What's Bill Clinton doing with that opossum?
27
posted on
01/18/2003 10:43:42 AM PST
by
rimmont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson