Posted on 01/12/2003 7:06:53 AM PST by GailA
Interesting summation. Since the "death penalty system" is part of their judicial system, Ryan's action is a scathing indictment of Illinois law and order. Either that or Ryan is stone nuts.
You'll have plenty of time to find out now that Ryan has granted the perps a chance at life that they denied their victims. Go pick their brains as they lounge around at taxpayer expense, getting three squares a day, free medical care, access to weight rooms, cable TV etc.
Again there's that parallel drawn between killing perpetrated by the government in the name of the Almighty State and killing perpetrated by murderous criminals in the name of evil. First Barnacle, and now you too.
If you object to the prison conditions that murderers are subjected to, that's fine, but it's not germane to the question of whether or not they should be killed as the ultimate expression of government force.
You raise "taxpayer expense," but I think it's been fairly well established that providing due process in death penalty cases costs more than warehousing murderers for the rest of their lives.
Some might argue that they get too many costly appeals, but lack of due process, judicial abuses, and corner-cutting is exactly what scuttled the Illinois death penalty.
Do the extra appeals have any useful function at acquitting those who turn out to be innocent?
If so, why are they not made available to those "merely" sentenced to life in prison, whose guilt is presumably less certain?
And if not, why bother with them at all?
Almighty state? How about in the name of justice?
First, I believe those who are tried, convicted and sentenced to death under our judicial system have been given justice. There are exceptions, but you should not make laws based on exceptions to the rule. Further, provides justice for the victim of the murderer and his survivors.
Heres an idea for you, why dont you pose your question, face to face, to the survivors of the murder victims now that Gov. Ryan just took their murderess off death row? Im sure youd find some of them happy to talk to you.
Second, Id rather see the limited resources of our taxpayer supported Government (and yes, contrary to popular belief, resources are limited) go toward training a doctor or preserving a natural area than keeping a vile and evil creature behind bars.
Third, contrary to what you probably believe, the death penalty is a deterrent to murder. If you have any doubt, look at this easy to understand graph. If you cant see a cause and effect relationship, look at it again.
If you still cant see a cause and effect relationship, look at it again.
Those murderers dont want to die. The threat of death is all that keeps many from carrying out their heinous imaginings. In Illinois the worse they can now expect is three square meals a day in a climate-controlled environment, access to weight training and a library and television entertainment. They can even get illegal drugs behind bars.
There are cretins living such a miserable existence on the streets, theyd be happy to commit a crime just to get those benefits.
But, they dont want to die.
Forth, I am subject to the same laws that I advocate applied to others. Ill gladly take my chances of wrongful conviction as an individual, so that justice will be served for the many.
Now, if youre going to try the old, But, if it will save just one child. logic. Save it. That logic (or lack there of) doesnt work on me. When youre saying, But, if it will save just one brutal murderer. It has even less appeal.
Heres an idea, rather than make all of us pay to keep those animals alive, why dont you start a volunteer fund for people who think like youYou can promote it like a membership to a local zoo. That way, you take the $30,000 per year burden of incarcerating a maximum-security prisoner off the backs of taxpayers.
Your friends can sponsor the brutal murderer of their choice. And, as long as they keep sending checks, he stays alive. Priority members even get visitation rights. You can get all warm and fuzzy with him. Become good friends, and he might even show you how to kill a man with a folded piece of paper.
Come on, youve got nothing to lose with your morally superior attitude. Put you money where your mouth is.
Jack Abbott comes to mind.
After the second murder, the leftist agitator and sometimes writer Norman Mailer should have been sent to prison with him.
Regarding the controversy surrounding the death penalty, much like the issue of abortion, this will be a contentious issue for many years to come. And it doesn't help that there is a certain political dynamic involved. Sigh, well, you know what I'm talking about...I'm talking about peeplow.
SOS I cant stop LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.