This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 01/08/2003 9:09:23 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
flamefest.
|
Skip to comments.
Shannon Reeves' Response to Bill Back (CRP's own Lott) Email Fiasco
email
| 1/8/03
Posted on 01/08/2003 12:17:20 PM PST by Bella_Bru
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-229 next last
1
posted on
01/08/2003 12:17:20 PM PST
by
Bella_Bru
To: NormsRevenge; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Cali ping list, please!
2
posted on
01/08/2003 12:17:50 PM PST
by
Bella_Bru
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative pingIf you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
3
posted on
01/08/2003 12:18:47 PM PST
by
mhking
(Please search before posting)
To: Bella_Bru; hchutch
Good grief.
I was in the room when a Hispanic GOP member whose family had been Americans since they found themselves in the United States as a result of the Mexican-American War spoke against prominently tying the GOP to Proposition 187 on tactical grounds.
One of the state GOP convention delegates shouted, "Go back to Tijuana, mojado!" A bunch of folks laughed.
Well, the guy told to go to TJ didn't; instead, he became a member of the Libertarian Party.
We've tolerated too many people who, if they aren't racist a$$holes, delight in acting as if they are.
4
posted on
01/08/2003 12:24:18 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(This tagline available, Freepmail me for rates)
To: Poohbah; mhking; rdb3; Luis Gonzalez; JohnHuang2; Miss Marple; Howlin
Agreed. There seem to be some others who seem bound and determined to ignore this fact. I won't mention names, but they seem to think that they want to turn the clock back to the 1920s.
They need to wake up and see reality before it kicks them in the rear. Beat a dog too much, and it might decide it has nothing to lose. The GOP does far better with Hispanics in Texas than it does in California.
Would anyone like to venture a guess as to why that might be the case?
5
posted on
01/08/2003 12:27:11 PM PST
by
hchutch
(Trillions for defense, not one cent for tribute.)
To: Poohbah
I don't think forwarding an email constitutes being a racist.
6
posted on
01/08/2003 12:27:33 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
To: AppyPappy
I don't think forwarding an email constitutes being a racist.Agreeing with the sentiment of the email (which is implied by forwarding it, unless you specifically disavow doing so when you forward it) may very well be racist, however.
7
posted on
01/08/2003 12:29:19 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(This tagline available, Freepmail me for rates)
To: Poohbah
I was in the room when a Hispanic GOP member whose family had been Americans since they found themselves in the United States as a result of the Mexican-American War spoke against prominently tying the GOP to Proposition 187 on tactical grounds. One of the state GOP convention delegates shouted, "Go back to Tijuana, mojado!" A bunch of folks laughed. Are you sh*tting me?!!?!?
8
posted on
01/08/2003 12:29:20 PM PST
by
Bella_Bru
To: Bella_Bru; Poohbah
Good grief... if this is true then Pete Wilson was the best person the Demcorats ever had in California...
9
posted on
01/08/2003 12:31:07 PM PST
by
hchutch
(Trillions for defense, not one cent for tribute.)
To: Bella_Bru
I s**t thee not, bubba-san.
10
posted on
01/08/2003 12:31:30 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(This tagline available, Freepmail me for rates)
To: Poohbah
I don't think that forwarding it means you agree with everything in the email. It is best to ASK the person instead of jumping to conclusions.
11
posted on
01/08/2003 12:31:42 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
To: AppyPappy
If you are in a high profile position, you need to cya at all times. He could have sent the email out with a disclaimer, such as, "I do not agree, but I thought this would make for interesting conversation" or something like that. Sending it without a disclaimer can be interpreted at agreement.
To: Poohbah
What a bunch of idiots. Just more embarassing fools that need to go.
To: AppyPappy
The fact is, sending the e-mail WITHOUT the disclaimer was stupid. The guy left himself open for misrepresentation, which is, IMO, felony stupid in this case, particularly when the GOP just got off the Lott fiasco.
The stupidity alone warrants making sure this guy's candidacy ends ASAP.
14
posted on
01/08/2003 12:34:59 PM PST
by
hchutch
(Trillions for defense, not one cent for tribute.)
To: AppyPappy
I don't think that forwarding it means you agree with everything in the email.Forwarding it without comment is, like all silence, assent.
15
posted on
01/08/2003 12:35:36 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(This tagline available, Freepmail me for rates)
To: Bella_Bru
That's not what we are talking about. The issue is whether he is a racist because he forwarded an email.
16
posted on
01/08/2003 12:36:40 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
To: Poohbah
I disagree. I forwarded the article about the peacenik who died in Iraq. That doesn't mean I agree with peaceniks.
17
posted on
01/08/2003 12:37:48 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
To: Bella_Bru
There are a lot of a$$holes in the GOP, which may be our biggest problem.
18
posted on
01/08/2003 12:39:56 PM PST
by
Tribune7
To: hchutch; TLBSHOW; sinkspur; Fred Mertz; Common Tator
The guy left himself open for misrepresentation, which is, IMO, felony stupid in this case, particularly when the GOP just got off the Lott fiasco. Unless I am mistaken, Back forwarded the e-mail a couple of years ago, i.e., a couple of years before the Lott incident.
I think we're seeing that this purge is not going to stop with Lott. A lot of people do things that can be characterized as stupid. People who never do anything of that kind are presumably terminally timid.
The article makes a big deal about who speaks at Bob Jones University. Didn't a certain occupant of the White House do so not so long ago?
To: AppyPappy
It gives the appearance. Politics is high profile. It isn't some guy sending around emails to close friends. Back hasn't exactly tried to explain his views or actions.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-229 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson