Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2003 6:12:40 AM PST by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: sheltonmac
The GOP, Party of Cowards

Sorry, shelty, but this isn't news to most of us. ; )
282 posted on 01/02/2003 10:50:33 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I bought this book (after seeing an unbelievable ad for it here in NYC - I took a picture of it and will try to post it later) over the holidays called "Double Take - Politically Incorrect Limericks" - the author, someone named R. Jaggero, made the exact point that is, that Republicans/conservatives are wimps in quite a poetic fashion...(I'd quote it here but 1. I'm at work and would not get it exactly right and 2. copyright issues?) Anyway, the rest of the book is a riot mostly attacking left-wing idiots like Bill Maher, Al Franken, Alec Baldwin, Whoopi Goldberg, Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, Brokaw, Cronkite, Woodward & Bernstein the Hollywood culture etc. You could even write to the author from their website http://www.doubletakebook.com
310 posted on 01/02/2003 11:15:34 AM PST by rpage3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
It's the same three-step process every time: 1) liberals make the accusation of racism against a Republican, 2) the Republican denies the charge and 3) the Republican agrees to sign on to the liberal agenda, hoping that in doing so he might prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that he is not a racist.

Could someone refresh my memory about the other times this process that's been used "every time" has been used?

395 posted on 01/02/2003 4:21:37 PM PST by Randjuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
Now that Lott has been forced to step down as Senate Majority Leader, neo-conservative Republicans are the ones cheering the loudest.

No, true conversatives are the ones cheering the loudest. Lott was a wimp.

397 posted on 01/02/2003 4:23:24 PM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
I want Newt!
401 posted on 01/02/2003 4:31:22 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
"We've wanted him gone for a long time," some have said. "We needed to get rid of him and move on with our agenda." The trouble is, no one in the party seems to know exactly what that agenda is.

As an independent voter, let me answer that question. To move the Republican Party to the left, of course.

409 posted on 01/02/2003 5:12:26 PM PST by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
No, the neo-cons were so desperate to prove that they could be just as racially sensitive as their slightly more liberal counterparts that Lott's political fate had already been sealed

Trent Lott was a crappy Senate leader...thats why he is gone...though I totally agree with the author on the rest of his premise...by and large...that the road paved with apeasment is stupid...

The war never ends...might as well fight "our" war...

426 posted on 01/02/2003 9:34:15 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson