Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Jose airport terminal evacuated when man found without ticket
Sac Bee ^ | 12/29/02 | AP

Posted on 12/29/2002 4:27:45 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:47:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: NormsRevenge
And the then-married Gonzalez has already had his sex scandal with some staffer. Just earning his stripes with the 'Rats.
21 posted on 12/29/2002 7:40:59 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I thought Denver was the Mineta airport.
22 posted on 12/29/2002 7:43:36 PM PST by chnsmok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
I bet they'd really freak if I were to snap some photos of the local animal life or even some of the screeners.

You bet your life! (literally) I seem to remember reading stories just a few years ago about the idiocy of some of the 'security precautions' that used to be taken at many places in the former USSR. Reporters would always be incredulous at the fact that their cameras were taken from thimn and film deliberately exposed when they took pictures of something the local commisars didn't want photographed...

Fast forward to 2002 in our own supposedly free nation. Try to take a camera with you to get some last minute pics of your loved ones as they board the plane (assuming you can get anywhere near close enough, and you'll most likely find yourself shortly sitting in a room being interregated by the local commisars and having your film exposed/confiscated. You'll be extremely lucky to get out of there with your freedom of movement intact.

Does this bother anyone else?

A couple of days ago, there was a story linked that had a fellow being charged by airport personnel for 'disorderly conduct' or something similar for allegedly freaking out when one of these fine 'professional' screeneds groped his pregnant wife's breasts during a 'pat-down'. The man's version of events and the security personel's version were, of course, wildly different. At the time I read the article I didn't think of it, but later on the question came to mind ...what about the cameras?

Surely with the massive amount of video survellance going on at these kafkeque nightmares we now call airports that there would be video evidence immediately available to the police (and later courts) to ascertain the actual facts of the incident in question. Amazingly, no such video evidence was mentioned.

Could someone out there who has had the misfortune of having to fly recently tell me if they noticed if there were cameras present at the screening gates. If they are not, then I'd have to ask, "why the heck not"? If we are going to give the kind of arbitrary power to these folks that they apparently have (or think they have), there needs to be some safeguards against them.

23 posted on 12/29/2002 8:40:46 PM PST by zeugma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
No shame, No blame ... Motto of the demRatic Party for The 3rd Millennium
24 posted on 12/29/2002 8:50:09 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson