‘YEMEN' SCUDS BAGHDAD-BOUND

New York Post ^ | 12/27/02 | URI DAN

[Mr. K]

LOL I forgot about that!!!!!! I laffed my A$$ off when that happened

[crystalk]

After Iraq, we will move on to Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Egypt, and the Sudan.

[ApesForEvolution]

"When we go to war with Iraq, North Korea will not rush to Iraq's defense and vise versa."

The Northcomms just came to Iraq's defense. The fact that it is an attempt to alleviate the Northcomm's plight is simply opportunistic on their part, but make no mistake that the relationship between N.K./Iraq was understood well before the "Axis of Evil" was identified by Bush.

North Korea won't attack America or American forces in Iraq during the war to rid the world of Sodom Insane, but it has already proven it will try and distract us, if not outright cause a diversion that is designed to water down our focus.

[Destro]

North Korea is doing what it is doing for domestic reasons (insane as they are) not to help Iraq.

[philosofy123]

The reason we are unable to capture Osama Bil Laden is simply because Moslems hrlp other Moslems against the infidels. We are going to face a similar sitiuattion in Iraq, if we attempted to capture Saddam.

[Destro]

Yea, but what has that to do with North Korea?

[gogeo]

I can't believe the simplistic thinking of libbies. They really do seem to be war mongering in the case of NK.



The difference between Iraq and NK is pretty simple...with Iraq we are at the end of a diplomatic process. That process is designed to remove the threat short of war. If we go to war, it will be because the diplomacy failed. That process took 1.5 years.



In the case of NK, that diplomatic process is nowhere near complete. Libbies are in favor of diplomacy, are they not?