Skip to comments.
Tolkien’s Clash of Civilizations
National Review Online ^
| December 18, 2002
| Rod Dreher
Posted on 12/22/2002 2:53:12 PM PST by HighRoadToChina
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 last
To: don-o
The metaphor of a line through each human heart is biblical in origin and has been used so often by so many authors over the centuries that no single writer can claim credit for it.
I'M calling it blurred. I believe Tolkien would agree.
81
posted on
12/23/2002 8:44:15 AM PST
by
beckett
To: don-o
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between political parties either - but right through every human heart."
I believe the rest of the quote is"...and who is willing to cut out a piece of his own heart? As Somebody said, once: "And if thy right eye scandalize thee, pluck it out and cast it from thee. For it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than thy whole body be cast into hell."
To: ArrogantBustard
As Somebody said, once: Perzactly!
That is the unspoken answer that I expect that Alexey had in mind, when he said what he said.
Good on you, AG.
83
posted on
12/23/2002 8:55:35 AM PST
by
don-o
To: beckett
The metaphor of a line through each human heart is biblical in origin Really?
Just grabbed the Strong's Concordance. Looked up "heart." Cannot find references to any line through it. There is a lot about hard, wicked, evil uncircumsized heart, as well as letting it not be troubled.
Nothing about a line, though.
(Not a flame. I am enjoying all the Tolkien discussion on line today.)
84
posted on
12/23/2002 9:06:13 AM PST
by
don-o
To: HighRoadToChina
...pride, and the all-consuming craving for power it fosters when unchecked, as the root of human evil.kinda describes the senatrix from NY
85
posted on
12/23/2002 9:15:49 AM PST
by
yianni
To: don-o
The sentiment is so pervasive throughout Christian (and Judeo) biblical teaching (at the heart of it, one might say), that, the absence of the exact phrase in Strong's concordance notwithstanding, Solzenitsyn certainly can't claim to have come up with it.
If memory serves, Augustine, Aquinas and Pascal all wrote the on same theme.
86
posted on
12/23/2002 10:29:00 AM PST
by
beckett
To: HighRoadToChina
bump...to read later...
I was suprised that our PBS affiliate ran a biography of Tolkein last night...
...must be trying to lure back viewers after airing that recruiting video for Islam
"Muhammad, Legacy of A Prophet".
87
posted on
12/23/2002 10:38:07 AM PST
by
VOA
To: Defiant
What a load of crap this is. They were office space, nothing more, built tall so that they could fit more square footage in a place where real estate is precious, and, like any building designed by any architect, made with an eye to appearance. If Tolkien would have looked on them as symbols of tyranny, then Tolkien's would have read too much into them. I think the authore is the one making a few leaps of logic. Frankly they were ugly, staid slabs of modernist crap.
As such they did represent the leveling sterility of rapcious capitalism - something Tolkien cared little for.
Obviously this does not justify in any sense whatsoever vile acts of terrorism like 9/11. There's no question whose "side" we are on or should be on or whose side Tolkien would immediately identify himself with.
It's just a warning to us to be aware of the corrosive elements in our own culture - as Dreher points out.
To: titanmike
The thing with the trees was cartoonish; they needed to think about that one a bit more. I agree with that. I expected to see a forest.
There were some variations from the book that I didn't think were necessary, too. . . like Fararamir's character which was more noble in the book than on the screen.
To: Defiant
They were office space, nothing more... I beg to differ. Muslim extremists didn't give up their lives for the cause of destroying some office space, or even the people who worked in those offices. They took out the towers in order to assault what the towers stood for.
90
posted on
01/13/2003 12:22:38 PM PST
by
Oberon
To: Mamzelle
If someone comes on here and says they are a Tolkien Ph.D, and they believe that Tolkien would have thought the WTC was a Symbol of Tyranny, then I will have to revise my view of Tolkien downward. In order to get an idea of what Tolkien would have thought of the World Trade Center towers, you might read That Hideous Strength, the third novel in C.S. Lewis's Perelandra trilogy. Lewis and Tolkien were colleagues and friends, and shared a strong suspicion of technology, industrialization, and bureaucracy.
I suspect that Tolkien might have seen the United States in 2003 as being something like Numenor--a strong and fundamentally good nation of men and women, but lately given to cultural excesses, not the least of which is pride. The ruins that we see in both Jackson films were left by a civilization that--technology aside--might have been very much like our own.
91
posted on
01/13/2003 12:29:28 PM PST
by
Oberon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson