Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coffee,Tea,or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell attheAirport?
lewrockwell.com ^ | 12/18/2002 | Nicholas Monahan

Posted on 12/21/2002 11:33:05 AM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham

 

Coffee, Tea, or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wife’s Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell at the Airport and Then Lying About Why We Put You There?

by Nicholas Monahan

This morning I’ll be escorting my wife to the hospital, where the doctors will perform a caesarean section to remove our first child. She didn’t want to do it this way – neither of us did – but sometimes the Fates decide otherwise. The Fates or, in our case, government employees.

On the morning of October 26th Mary and I entered Portland International Airport, en route to the Las Vegas wedding of one of my best friends. Although we live in Los Angeles, we’d been in Oregon working on a film, and up to that point had had nothing but praise to shower on the city of Portland, a refreshing change of pace from our own suffocating metropolis.

At the security checkpoint I was led aside for the "inspection" that’s all the rage at airports these days. My shoes were removed. I was told to take off my sweater, then to fold over the waistband of my pants. My baseball hat, hastily jammed on my head at 5 AM, was removed and assiduously examined ("Anything could be in here, sir," I was told, after I asked what I could hide in a baseball hat. Yeah. Anything.) Soon I was standing on one foot, my arms stretched out, the other leg sticking out in front of me àla a DUI test. I began to get pissed off, as most normal people would. My anger increased when I realized that the newly knighted federal employees weren’t just examining me, but my 7½ months pregnant wife as well. I’d originally thought that I’d simply been randomly selected for the more excessive than normal search. You know, Number 50 or whatever. Apparently not though – it was both of us. These are your new threats, America: pregnant accountants and their sleepy husbands flying to weddings.

After some more grumbling on my part they eventually finished with me and I went to retrieve our luggage from the x-ray machine. Upon returning I found my wife sitting in a chair, crying. Mary rarely cries, and certainly not in public. When I asked her what was the matter, she tried to quell her tears and sobbed, "I’m sorry...it’s...they touched my breasts...and..." That’s all I heard. I marched up to the woman who’d been examining her and shouted, "What did you do to her?" Later I found out that in addition to touching her swollen breasts – to protect the American citizenry – the employee had asked that she lift up her shirt. Not behind a screen, not off to the side – no, right there, directly in front of the hundred or so passengers standing in line. And for you women who’ve been pregnant and worn maternity pants, you know how ridiculous those things look. "I felt like a clown," my wife told me later. "On display for all these people, with the cotton panel on my pants and my stomach sticking out. When I sat down I just lost my composure and began to cry. That’s when you walked up."

Of course when I say she "told me later," it’s because she wasn’t able to tell me at the time, because as soon as I demanded to know what the federal employee had done to make her cry, I was swarmed by Portland police officers. Instantly. Three of them, cinching my arms, locking me in handcuffs, and telling me I was under arrest. Now my wife really began to cry. As they led me away and she ran alongside, I implored her to calm down, to think of the baby, promising her that everything would turn out all right. She faded into the distance and I was shoved into an elevator, a cop holding each arm. After making me face the corner, the head honcho told that I was under arrest and that I wouldn’t be flying that day – that I was in fact a "menace."

It took me a while to regain my composure. I felt like I was one of those guys in The Gulag Archipelago who, because the proceedings all seem so unreal, doesn’t fully realize that he is in fact being arrested in a public place in front of crowds of people for...for what? I didn’t know what the crime was. Didn’t matter. Once upstairs, the officers made me remove my shoes and my hat and tossed me into a cell. Yes, your airports have prison cells, just like your amusement parks, train stations, universities, and national forests. Let freedom reign.

After a short time I received a visit from the arresting officer. "Mr. Monahan," he started, "Are you on drugs?"

Was this even real? "No, I’m not on drugs."

"Should you be?"

"What do you mean?"

"Should you be on any type of medication?"

"No."

"Then why’d you react that way back there?"

You see the thinking? You see what passes for reasoning among your domestic shock troops these days? Only "whackos" get angry over seeing the woman they’ve been with for ten years in tears because someone has touched her breasts. That kind of reaction – love, protection – it’s mind-boggling! "Mr. Monahan, are you on drugs?" His snide words rang inside my head. This is my wife, finally pregnant with our first child after months of failed attempts, after the depressing shock of the miscarriage last year, my wife who’d been walking on a cloud over having the opportunity to be a mother...and my anger is simply unfathomable to the guy standing in front of me, the guy who earns a living thanks to my taxes, the guy whose family I feed through my labor. What I did wasn’t normal. No, I reacted like a drug addict would’ve. I was so disgusted I felt like vomiting. But that was just the beginning.

An hour later, after I’d been gallantly assured by the officer that I wouldn’t be attending my friend’s wedding that day, I heard Mary’s voice outside my cell. The officer was speaking loudly, letting her know that he was planning on doing me a favor... which everyone knows is never a real favor. He wasn’t going to come over and help me work on my car or move some furniture. No, his "favor" was this: He’d decided not to charge me with a felony.

Think about that for a second. Rapes, car-jackings, murders, arsons – those are felonies. So is yelling in an airport now, apparently. I hadn’t realized, though I should have. Luckily, I was getting a favor, though. I was merely going to be slapped with a misdemeanor.

"Here’s your court date," he said as I was released from my cell. In addition, I was banned from Portland International for 90 days, and just in case I was thinking of coming over and hanging out around its perimeter, the officer gave me a map with the boundaries highlighted, sternly warning me against trespassing. Then he and a second officer escorted us off the grounds. Mary and I hurriedly drove two and a half hours in the rain to Seattle, where we eventually caught a flight to Vegas. But the officer was true to his word – we missed my friend’s wedding. The fact that he’d been in my own wedding party, the fact that a once in a lifetime event was stolen from us – well, who cares, right?

Upon our return to Portland (I’d had to fly into Seattle and drive back down), we immediately began contacting attorneys. We aren’t litigious people – we wanted no money. I’m not even sure what we fully wanted. An apology? A reprimand? I don’t know. It doesn’t matter though, because we couldn’t afford a lawyer, it turned out. $4,000 was the average figure bandied about as a retaining fee. Sorry, but I’ve got a new baby on the way. So we called the ACLU, figuring they existed for just such incidents as these. And they do apparently...but only if we were minorities. That’s what they told us.

In the meantime, I’d appealed my suspension from PDX. A week or so later I got a response from the Director of Aviation. After telling me how, in the aftermath of 9/11, most passengers not only accept additional airport screening but welcome it, he cut to the chase:

"After a review of the police report and my discussions with police staff, as well as a review of the TSA’s report on this incident, I concur with the officer’s decision to take you into custody and to issue a citation to you for disorderly conduct. That being said, because I also understand that you were upset and acted on your emotions, I am willing to lift the Airport Exclusion Order...."

Attached to this letter was the report the officer had filled out. I’d like to say I couldn’t believe it, but in a way, I could. It’s seemingly becoming the norm in America – lies and deliberate distortions on the part of those in power, no matter how much or how little power they actually wield.

The gist of his report was this: From the get go I wasn’t following the screener’s directions. I was "squinting my eyes" and talking to my wife in a "low, forced voice" while "excitedly swinging my arms." Twice I began to walk away from the screener, inhaling and exhaling forcefully. When I’d completed the physical exam, I walked to the luggage screening area, where a second screener took a pair of scissors from my suitcase. At this point I yelled, "What the %*&$% is going on? This is &*#&$%!" The officer, who’d already been called over by one of the screeners, became afraid for the TSA staff and the many travelers. He required the assistance of a second officer as he "struggled" to get me into handcuffs, then for "cover" called over a third as well. It was only at this point that my wife began to cry hysterically.

There was nothing poetic in my reaction to the arrest report. I didn’t crumple it in my fist and swear that justice would be served, promising to sacrifice my resources and time to see that it would. I simply stared. Clearly the officer didn’t have the guts to write down what had really happened. It might not look too good to see that stuff about the pregnant woman in tears because she’d been humiliated. Instead this was the official scenario being presented for the permanent record. It doesn’t even matter that it’s the most implausible sounding situation you can think of. "Hey, what the...godammit, they’re taking our scissors, honey!" Why didn’t he write in anything about a monkey wearing a fez?

True, the TSA staff had expropriated a pair of scissors from our toiletries kit – the story wasn’t entirely made up. Except that I’d been locked in airport jail at the time. I didn’t know anything about any scissors until Mary told me on our drive up to Seattle. They’d questioned her about them while I was in the bowels of the airport sitting in my cell.

So I wrote back, indignation and disgust flooding my brain.

"[W]hile I’m not sure, I’d guess that the entire incident is captured on video. Memory is imperfect on everyone’s part, but the footage won’t lie. I realize it might be procedurally difficult for you to view this, but if you could, I’d appreciate it. There’s no willful disregard of screening directions. No explosion over the discovery of a pair of scissors in a suitcase. No struggle to put handcuffs on. There’s a tired man, early in the morning, unhappily going through a rigorous procedure and then reacting to the tears of his pregnant wife."

Eventually we heard back from a different person, the guy in charge of the TSA airport screeners. One of his employees had made the damning statement about me exploding over her scissor discovery, and the officer had deftly incorporated that statement into his report. We asked the guy if he could find out why she’d said this – couldn’t she possibly be mistaken? "Oh, can’t do that, my hands are tied. It’s kind of like leading a witness – I could get in trouble, heh heh." Then what about the videotape? Why not watch that? That would exonerate me. "Oh, we destroy all video after three days."

Sure you do.

A few days later we heard from him again. He just wanted to inform us that he’d received corroboration of the officer’s report from the officer’s superior, a name we didn’t recognize. "But...he wasn’t even there," my wife said.

"Yeah, well, uh, he’s corroborated it though."

That’s how it works.

"Oh, and we did look at the videotape. Inconclusive."

But I thought it was destroyed?

On and on it went. Due to the tenacity of my wife in making phone calls and speaking with relevant persons, the "crime" was eventually lowered to a mere citation. Only she could have done that. I would’ve simply accepted what was being thrown at me, trumped up charges and all, simply because I’m wholly inadequate at performing the kowtow. There’s no way I could have contacted all the people Mary did and somehow pretend to be contrite. Besides, I speak in a low, forced voice, which doesn’t elicit sympathy. Just police suspicion.

Weeks later at the courthouse I listened to a young DA awkwardly read the charges against me – "Mr. Monahan...umm...shouted obscenities at the airport staff...umm... umm...oh, they took some scissors from his suitcase and he became...umm...abusive at this point." If I was reading about it in Kafka I might have found something vaguely amusing in all of it. But I wasn’t. I was there. Living it.

I entered a plea of nolo contendere, explaining to the judge that if I’d been a resident of Oregon, I would have definitely pled "Not Guilty." However, when that happens, your case automatically goes to a jury trial, and since I lived a thousand miles away, and was slated to return home in seven days, with a newborn due in a matter of weeks...you get the picture. "No Contest" it was. Judgment: $250 fine.

Did I feel happy? Only $250, right? No, I wasn’t happy. I don’t care if it’s twelve cents, that’s money pulled right out of my baby’s mouth and fed to a disgusting legal system that will use it to propagate more incidents like this. But at the very least it was over, right? Wrong.

When we returned to Los Angeles there was an envelope waiting for me from the court. Inside wasn’t a receipt for the money we’d paid. No, it was a letter telling me that what I actually owed was $309 – state assessed court costs, you know. Wouldn’t you think your taxes pay for that – the state putting you on trial? No, taxes are used to hire more cops like the officer, because with our rising criminal population – people like me – hey, your average citizen demands more and more "security."

Finally I reach the piece de resistance. The week before we’d gone to the airport my wife had had her regular pre-natal checkup. The child had settled into the proper head down position for birth, continuing the remarkable pregnancy she’d been having. We returned to Portland on Sunday. On Mary’s Monday appointment she was suddenly told, "Looks like your baby’s gone breech." When she later spoke with her midwives in Los Angeles, they wanted to know if she’d experienced any type of trauma recently, as this often makes a child flip. "As a matter of fact..." she began, recounting the story, explaining how the child inside of her was going absolutely crazy when she was crying as the police were leading me away through the crowd.

My wife had been planning a natural childbirth. She’d read dozens of books, meticulously researched everything, and had finally decided that this was the way for her. No drugs, no numbing of sensations – just that ultimate combination of brute pain and sheer joy that belongs exclusively to mothers. But my wife is also a first-time mother, so she has what is called an "untested" pelvis. Essentially this means that a breech birth is too dangerous to attempt, for both mother and child. Therefore, she’s now relegated to a c-section – hospital stay, epidural, catheter, fetal monitoring, stitches – everything she didn’t want. Her natural birth has become a surgery.

We’ve tried everything to turn that baby. Acupuncture, chiropractic techniques, underwater handstands, elephant walking, moxibustion, bending backwards over pillows, herbs, external manipulation – all to no avail. When I walked into the living room the other night and saw her plaintively cooing with a flashlight turned onto her stomach, yet another suggested technique, my heart almost broke. It’s breaking now as I write these words.

I can never prove that my child went breech because of what happened to us at the airport. But I’ll always believe it. Wrongly or rightly, I’ll forever think of how this man, the personification of this system, has affected the lives of my family and me. When my wife is sliced open, I’ll be thinking of him. When they remove her uterus from her abdomen and lay it on her stomach, I’ll be thinking of him. When I visit her and my child in the hospital instead of having them with me here in our home, I’ll be thinking of him. When I assist her to the bathroom while the incision heals internally, I’ll be thinking of him.

There are plenty of stories like this these days. I don’t know how many I’ve read where the writer describes some breach of civil liberties by employees of the state, then wraps it all up with a dire warning about what we as a nation are becoming, and how if we don’t put an end to it now, then we’re in for heaps of trouble. Well you know what? Nothing’s going to stop the inevitable. There’s no policy change that’s going to save us. There’s no election that’s going to put a halt to the onslaught of tyranny. It’s here already – this country has changed for the worse and will continue to change for the worse. There is now a division between the citizenry and the state. When that state is used as a tool against me, there is no longer any reason why I should owe any allegiance to that state.

And that’s the first thing that child of ours is going to learn.

December 21, 2002

Nick Monahan works in the film industry. He writes out of Los Angeles where he lives with his wife and as of December 18th, his beautiful new son.

Copyright © 2002 LewRockwell.com

     

 

Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: policestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
Comment #761 Removed by Moderator

To: Republic of Texas
The government agents are protecting a vulnerable border. Those ports are a national security issue as much as any other port or border crossing. The airlines need to focus on flying airplanes, imho, not in providing the whole security system. If threats are found, they need the power to arrest.

Look, we disagree on whether society can make rules about how we live, and if they do, whether I have to abide by it. It a society governed by laws, I think I do.
762 posted on 12/22/2002 10:15:00 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
You had stated that there is a contract enumerating the rights of citizens and if we wish to add to them there is a procedure. On this point you are absolutely wrong.

Really, now. It's perfectly possible to make an argument without distorting my words. What I actually said was that there is a contract enumerating the rights that society recognizes and protects. You may certainly assert rights beyond that, but those are the rights protected by society. If you wish to add to the list of rights protected by society, there is a procedure for so doing.

You see, it cannot be your right if it infringes upon mine. This is why health care can NEVER be a "right". To make it so would require someone else to give you something of his, i.e. the doctor would give away his time and expertise. This would infringe upon his rights.

My copy of the Consitution must be an edited version - I can't seem to find that language anywhere in the Ninth Amendment. Perhaps you would be so good as to list the portions of the Ninth that support such a contention.

Their job is to secure MY rights and do the things, and ONLY the things, which I give them permission to do.

Of course. However, that does not make every wish you have into a "right". Society is not obligated to protect something as a right merely because you assert it to be so.

763 posted on 12/22/2002 10:17:59 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: templar
Ever notice how most public 'servants' react to a camcorder or tape recorder in these situations? It's impressive: like a vampire recoiling from a cross.

LOL!

764 posted on 12/22/2002 10:18:06 AM PST by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
You have that backwards sir. Point out the language that makes them LEGAL.

The Constitution guarantees your right to be free from "unreasonable" search and seizure. You seem to consider a consensual search unreasonable. Your opinion is in the minority.

They have to have MY permission to do something.

As in, when they ask your permission to search you before you board a commercial flight? Permission that you are free to refuse at any point during the boarding process?

765 posted on 12/22/2002 10:21:02 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
Remember, your rights END where mine BEGIN. When you defame me sir, you have harmed me. You have infringed upon my rights.
...
Travel is an absolute, unrestricted right? I can travel in any fashion I like, under any circumstances I choose?

You certainly may, as long as the fashion, and circumstances, do not infringe upon anothers rights or property.

So, in other words, neither my right to free speech nor my right to travel are absolute and unencumbered. Why can't you guys just admit this? I know it, you know it, the world knows it by now. I do not have an absolute and unencumbered right to free speech or to travel, and neither do you.

A RIGHT, by its very definition, ceases when it infringes upon the rights of another.

Funny, my copy of the Ninth Amendment doesn't say that, either...

766 posted on 12/22/2002 10:25:16 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

Comment #767 Removed by Moderator

To: EricOKC
A right to something cannot exist if it infringes upon the rights of another.

So, in other words, my rights are not absolute and unencumbered. My free-speech rights do not extend to defamation, and I probably don't have the right to shout through a loudspeaker on your lawn at 3 AM.

So, since that we both agree that some restrictions to rights are inevitable, let us turn now to deciding what those restrictions ought to be...

768 posted on 12/22/2002 10:36:44 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
I require them to obtain a valid search warrant, rather than just doing whatever they please.

You do that and be sure your airline carrier believes in waiting for you. I suspect that when faced with an inconvenience of scrambled flight plans or a reasonable search, you will assume the position.

769 posted on 12/22/2002 10:38:59 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Sorry to give you a homework assignment, but this is another example of who "we" are. The story here here isn't the article but the replies.

More to come.

Did "we" hit? I'll take mine in C notes.

Thanks
770 posted on 12/22/2002 10:39:46 AM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #771 Removed by Moderator

Comment #772 Removed by Moderator

To: general_re
The airlines are being driven into bankruptcy because this federally mandated security is driving away most of their business. The security won't stop another terror attack; it merely makes using airliners for an attack a little more difficult. Now you KNOW that nothing could stop the guy who snaps because his wife leaves him--except determined passengers who aren't going to let a froot loop take their lives. Security that won't out-and-out STOP an organized terror cell with a good plan is just plain worthless. The best security we have is the determination of a free people not to be flown into buildings again. The government saps that determination rather than building it when they deem us too irresponsible to take knitting needles on PRIVATE property. (If the airlines don't want knitting needles, that's their call, as part of the competitive world of businessmaking decisions.)

The airlines are going to have to push back at the government sooner or later, or be driven out of business. Too many people who don't need to fly are refusing to fly, and too many people who do need to fly are cutting back. If we want to have commercial airlines (and I think our economy demands commercial airlines)--then we must stop this groping of women and harassment of high-strung but gallant men.

Read the article. The guy may be kinda stupid and taken in by the socialists in many ways, but can you doubt that if anyone tried to highjack the plane his pregnant wife was on, he'd be joining the line to whack the highjacker?

I see only a couple of sheep on this thread who would sit down and let a highjacker cut their throats without fighting back. Most of us would lay down our lives to prevent another 9/11.
773 posted on 12/22/2002 10:45:20 AM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

Comment #774 Removed by Moderator

To: EricOKC
Sir, they are not asking my permission, they are forcing me to give consent. There really is a difference.

What right of yours is being violated if you refuse?

Further, to require me to submit to the search before engaging in LEGAL activity, they are, in fact, violating my 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination. They are forcing me to perhaps incriminate myself.

What crime are you planning on committing that you require prior protection from self-incrimination? By your logic, it is illegal for you to carry a gun onto a plane, so therefore to search you for that gun would violate your right not to self-incriminate yourself. In which case, you are free to violate the law at will, and there's very little point in even having such a law. Is that really where you want to go with this?

775 posted on 12/22/2002 10:49:19 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

Comment #776 Removed by Moderator

Comment #777 Removed by Moderator

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Huffing little pansy windbag

Riiiiht! This guy was a pansy. Nice spin. I guess up is down and black is white in your little world too.

778 posted on 12/22/2002 10:53:20 AM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

Comment #779 Removed by Moderator

To: RobertFrost; 2sheep; Thinkin' Gal; babylonian; Skooz; Jeremiah Jr
Nothing’s going to stop the inevitable. There’s no policy change that’s going to save us. There’s no election that’s going to put a halt to the onslaught of tyranny. It’s here already – this country has changed for the worse and will continue to change for the worse. There is now a division between the citizenry and the state. When that state is used as a tool against me, there is no longer any reason why I should owe any allegiance to that state.

And that’s the first thing that child of ours is going to learn.

He should have the child learn that while living in some remote area like Western Samoa.

It's not just about some female sexual deviant feeling up women's breasts in the airport (similar incidents have already been reported in the media, I see a trend starting), we also have political prisoners and mafia style court enforcement of personal vendettas becoming commonplace. How about Christians being persecuted for exercising their civil rights and having women arrested and their files maliciously merged with prostitutes' files so that they can be stripped searched and subjected to syphilis blood tests, or teenagers who are told they have to stay overnight in prison subject to a judge's order even though the order violates the law, just to touch the surface of what's going on.

Then if your civil rights are violated, try finding an attorney who will defend you for less than $10,000 and that's without going to trial, and is the attorney going to work for you or is he going to be working for the system?

I had a dream Thanksgiving eve that woke me from sleep, shaking and in a cold sweat. I dreamed that I was in a large enclosed municipal style parking lot late at night and I was walking to my car all alone. It looked like an airport parking lot and looked to be empty except that on the other side of the parking level I could hear a man ordering some woman around and I couldn't make out the conversation, but I could hear that she was pleading with him. The only words I could understand clearly were that the man was repeatedly saying, "Homeland Security says..." In the dream, as I listened to their conversation escalate, I was overtaken by terror and I was trying to think of a way of helping this woman, but in the dream I also knew that this "Homeland Security" was very powerful and its network reached everywhere, and it reminded me of the Wizard of Oz movie where everyone spoke of the Wizard in a deferential mysterious way.

I couldn't call the police because this man who was threatening the woman was himself some type of law enforcement person and I ran a risk of getting another sadistic cohort of his if I called. It was clear to me in the dream that the whole system was extensively infiltrated by these sadistic types and that those who tried to sound the battle cry would be punished. So I tried to think of who I could trust that might be able to do something for her, but I knew I better get out of there before he saw me.

I was shaking so hard I couldn't find my car key on my key chain, I kept flipping through the keys but my brain wasn't processing what I was seeing. I only remember feeling this type of terror once in my life and it was when I was snorkeling and had terror overcome me but didn't know why, so I started swimming furiously to the boat and felt like an idiot trying to remember how to swim, but made it to the boat. In a few minutes, I heard my cousin in law swimming furiously to the boat also and found out that he had seen what looked to be a great white swimming right below me! I had this same feeling in the dream, it was an intuitive all encompassing terror that had a survival instinct component, and I knew that I only had a moment to get out of there or there would be more like him arriving soon.

I finally found my key, opened my car door and drove away, but not before catching a glimpse at the area where I had heard the woman's pleadings come from. By now she was crying and I couldn't see him and I could only see her body, not her face, because part of the view was obstructed by dividing posts, but I could see that she was tied or handcuffed to something low, like maybe the back of a car, and was almost lying prostate on the ground and her body was shaking terribly, and I was overcome with anguish seeing her and she was very thin, and was dressed in very beautiful gauzy (ethereal-like, they were linen/muslin like but really glowed) white slacks and a white blouse, and I woke up shaking and couldn't get back to sleep.

Rev. 19:8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.

Rev.7:13- 17And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they?
And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and night in his temple: and he that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them.
They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat.
For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.

Rev. 6:11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they [were], should be fulfilled.

780 posted on 12/22/2002 10:58:15 AM PST by Prodigal Daughter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson