Skip to comments.
Sen. Murray blistered over bin Laden remark
Seattle Times ^
| Saturday, December 21, 2002, 12:10 a.m.
| Katherine Pfleger and Alex Fryer
Posted on 12/21/2002 10:03:05 AM PST by Doctor Raoul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 last
To: gitmo
To: Doctor Raoul
Murry and her magnificent democrats stand for nothing except overt treason, aborting 3rd trimester babies, and increasing the income of the evil lawyer industry.
To: gitmo
I especially thought this comment reflected current rat 2004-preparation strategy:
"Murray is a test platform for Hillary. Send out someone stupid, see if it flies or not and Hillary will take it from there."
I think the rats are going for broke in 2004 and will put hillary out in front.
To: barryselby
All that hemming and hawing is because Joe Biden didn't have any material available that he has stolen from another source.
Oh, sorry, he's a product of the '60's. I meant to say, "...that he has liberated from another source."
104
posted on
12/22/2002 9:37:52 AM PST
by
Bernard
To: Libloather
Y'all are missing the point here.
Tennis-show-wearing soccer-mom Murray drops by the school expecting to spew her hate in front of a bunch of brainwashed zombies, but she is surprised to find that a few of the folks in the audience are actually able to think.
Now she is off on damage-control duty.
It will be a sad day when "dim" folks like Murray are able to tell lies like this and everyone will just nod obediently.
J.A. Jr.
Comment #106 Removed by Moderator
Comment #107 Removed by Moderator
To: Doctor Raoul
"What is important is that we have to have thoughtful debates and discussions in this country and raise questions and answer them without being pulled into some right-wing media frenzy," Murray said. "That is truly frightening to me. Thoughtful debates? How is claiming that OBL is somehow a humanitarian who cares and provides for poor people a thoughtful debate? Doesn't that imply that the process of 'thought' was involved?
Still, it WAS a nice way to throw in that whole thing about 'right-wing media frenzy'. You know, insert it into the zeitgeist....
To: Doctor Raoul
...being pulled into some right-wing media frenzy...WHERE, WHERE?
109
posted on
12/22/2002 9:57:35 AM PST
by
JimRed
To: EDINVA
Is that kinda like "winging it" at a 100th birthday party? No, no, no! Those remarks were made by an evil Republican who wants to bring back the segregation of black Americans; these are made by an altruistic Democrat who only wishes to better the world. Really.
To: wunderkind54
The Democrats need a new Lee Atwater....someone not afraid to get his hands dirty with the distasteful...the Dems are full of them and unfortunately with the dumbing down of the American voter it works for them much better than it should.
The Reps need to start producing ads showing the face of the Democrat party - Patty Murry, David Bonior, and that traitor from Washington --Bagdad Bob...or whatever his name is (sorry about this Alzheimer's moment!) - show their face - hear their voices praising Osama and Hussein...
paint the Democrats with the traitor brush, just like the Dems, including both Clintons, Daschle, Kerry, and the rest of the Dumbocrats are painting all Republicans based on a stupid, indefensible comment made by Lott.
Run ads everywhere - print, radio, television...let the 2004 campaign begin now - Dems are playing this game - give it right back to them!
111
posted on
12/22/2002 10:04:35 AM PST
by
Froggie
To: MadelineZapeezda
I have to agree with you that DOWD'S Syndrome is a much better discription of patty, infact it's brilliant! Ok, from this day on, it's DOWD'S Syndrome patty murray.
To: BibChr
Fienswine & Boxer for you, and Clinton & Schumer for me.
Six to one, half dozen of the other.... We're both hurting units.....
(It's brother, BTW)....:-)
To: Doctor Raoul
I wouldn't hold against her that she expressed the idea that Bin Laden was popular with some becuase he spread some money around.
I will very much hold against her, her claim that "we haven' t done that." Why would she make an easily disproven, untrue statement to high school kids that puts in a worse light than a murderer who is trying to destroy us?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson