Posted on 12/13/2002 5:41:17 AM PST by SJackson
They ruled that there is an individual Right, while the 9th ruled there is not.
The 5th went on to say that although there is an individual Right, it can be restricted. They got it half right.
How the SC settles the issue will likely be a watershed event in how the future unfolds.
How much difference is there between saying "There is no Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms" and "There is a Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms only in the circumstances where the government chooses to allow it"? They seem about the same to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.