Posted on 12/11/2002 6:28:08 AM PST by A2J
Actually it is atheits that cannot disprove God by scientific means: abiogenesis has been proven scientifically impossible, the Universe has been shown to be intelligently designed, the development of a human from conception to birth is not random but a program which cannot be stochastically changed. It is you and your fellow atheists that have to disprove God and you have nothing but lame rhetoric to do it with.
It has not been answered because it is totally irrelevant to the question of whether evolution is scientifically true or not. However the following posts are relevant and have gone totally unrefuted. This proves your atheistic religion (aka evolution) to be totally false and totally unscienitific:
Neither you nor any evolutionists has ever given proof that a single species has transformed itself into another more complex species. If I am wrong, let's see the proof. Come up with a real arguement that slams evolution can you do it?
There are many. The bacterial flagellum is one. The program by which a single cell at conception turns into a 100 trillion cells at the time of birth - with every single cell of the exactly proper kind in the exactly proper place is another. There are many more which have been scientifically proven, but these two should keep you busy for a while.
988 posted on 12/23/2002 7:07 AM PST by gore3000
'Gradual loss of egg laying' is more easily said than done. You must remember that the you need to provide nutrition to the developing organism throughout its development - as well as after the birth until it can feed itself. To say that all these changes can occur simultaneously is totally ludicrous and you have disproven nothing. Let's see an article describing how this change occurred in detail. Can you find any? I doubt it because this is one of the things evolutionists never speak of.
989 posted on 12/23/2002 7:14 AM PST by gore3000
And where did you debunk the flagellum besides in your own mind?
As to the eye spot, your article only says that because it happened more than once then therefore the eye spot could have occurred. It is not a refutation of the complex mechanism required for an eye spot.
BTW - a blog from Don Lindsay is proof of absolutely nothing. The guy cannot even give references for his nonsense.
991 posted on 12/23/2002 7:28 AM PST by gore3000
When are the lamers of evolution going to refute the following posts: 988, 989, 991
When are you, the #1 lamer of evolution going to refute the following posts: 988, 989, 991
The #1 lamer of evolution continues to spam the thread. As I have told you already Vade, you need to take your meds and have a long rest.
When are you going to refute the following posts: 988, 989, 991
I see you have not taken your meds yet and continue to spam the thread.
When are you, the #1 lamer of evolution going to refute the following posts: 988, 989, 991
Continuing to spam the thread. Seems that is all you do on these threads Patrick. When are you and your fellow lamers of evolution going to refute the following posts: 988, 989, 991
Of course it is not directed at anyone but me. You are even too dishonest to address your posts to the person you are attacking.
When are you and your fellow lamers of evolution going to refute the following posts: 988, 989, 991
You claim to be a physicist and you ask that quesition? It is totally dishonest to ask a question for which you know the answer so you are either not a physicist or you are attacking someone for making a statement you know to be true. Either way you are showing your dishonesty.
You really need to stop lying and insulting people. Gravity is a scientific fact, evolution is not. Gravity can be observed by anyone, evolution has never been observed.
Aaah, semantics again! It is the same color as electricity which has been observed also. However, if you think gravity is not true, lets both of us go on top of a 20 story building. If you fall up, I will agree with you that gravity is false.
Okay, then you and Dr. Stochastic go up together on a 20 story building and see if you fall up. This is your great chance to prove me wrong, let's see you guys do it. Heck it's sure better than making fools of yourselves denying what is incontrovertibly true.
Yup, the evolutionists always grow silent when they know they have lost the discussion. Guess you did not get your e-mail from Patrick telling you not to bump this thread.
Perhaps if the moon were a lot closer, as it once was, we would be light enough to fly. At least according to the theories of one former poster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.