UNNATURAL LAW (Supremes to review sodomy laws) liberal barf-and offensive content alert

NEW YORKER ^ | 12/16/02 issue | Hendrik Hertzberg

[concerned about politics]

Well, here's the difference on three out of four of those categories you mention: children, animals and dead people cannot give consent and therefore we do not allow people to have sex with them.

Using your logic:

What do you mean you "don't allow?" Why not? There are no absolutes, remember? No right or wrong?
I thought you were supporting the strange. Dead people are dead. If your logic is correct, why not do them? They don't care!
Animals can't speak, so how do you know? Maybe the beastialite feels they are saying yes. Who are you to question them? What gives you the right to judge them?
Children? Talk to NAMBLA about that, According to them, their victims did approve.
Gee, anything above the temperature of liquid nitrogen is fair game. Just stick it in. If it feels good - do it!

[concerned about politics]

No one is "forcing" companies to provide benefits to gay couples.

Yes they are. The Salvation Army is fighting it in court as we speak.

[Phantom Lord]

I have no objection to business voluntarily doing assigning benefits. But groups (and they exist) that are attempting to use law (backed at the end by a government gun) to make a business owner pay benefits, or hire X% blacks, gays or women, etc.... are simply wrong.

I agree 100%. But you have contended that business have been "forced" to provide same sex partner benefits. Can you show me one, who by the governments guns have been "forced" to do this?

[Clint N. Suhks]

Homosexuals are not mentally ill.

Umm…paraphilic disorders are considered an illness though not totally debilitating.

[Phantom Lord]

Doesnt the Salvation Army receive federal funds? If it doesnt not, then my memory is wrong. But if it does, it voluntarily entered into an agreement with the Imperial Federal Government (IFG) and now has to play buy its rules. If it doesnt want to abide by the IFGs rules, then don't take the money.

[Clint N. Suhks]

children, animals and dead people cannot give consent and therefore we do not allow people to have sex with them.

You forgot relatives, they can consent. Some children can consent; who told you they couldn’t? Animals and corpses are property, why do you have the right to tell people what they can't do in the privacy of their own barns? Can you say hypocrite?

[concerned about politics]

Doesnt the Salvation Army receive federal funds? If it doesnt not, then my memory is wrong. But if it does, it voluntarily entered into an agreement with the Imperial Federal Government (IFG) and now has to play buy its rules. If it doesnt want to abide by the IFGs rules, then don't take the money.

Yes they do recieve funds for the meals on wheels program. Being a Christian organization, if the homosexuals win, the meals on wheels program will have to end.
The Salvation Army cannot not forgo their immortal souls , so many will go hungry. To the homosexuals, their sex is more important than food for the elderly. They don't care. They want their sex and freebies, and screw the elderly homebound.

[concerned about politics]

Homosexuals are not mentally ill. Though I strongly suspect that FF578 and those who think like him are.

So that would be the other 98% of the straight population. Go figure. Gay logic?

[concerned about politics]

Nice to see you think so highly of our Vice Presidents daughter.

I believe she's ill, yes.

[HumanaeVitae]

Looks like the libertarian/conservative debate is pretty hot today. I spent some time today debating pornography...

Homosexuality is a perversion and society has every right to regulate it.

[Bella_Bru]

We were also debating sodomy amongst hetero couples. Married ones too. Of course, some here think that they should be allowed to tell Mr. and Mrs. X what they can do with each other sexually.

[Bluntpoint]

Don't you mean Mr. and Mrs. PG13?

[Phantom Lord]

As I said, if the Salvantion Army wants to take the IFGs money, then it must dance with the date that brought em. If they dont want to dance with the devil, refuse the devils funds.

[Bella_Bru]

:-P

I meant X as in any last name.

[concerned about politics]

As I said, if the Salvantion Army wants to take the IFGs money, then it must dance with the date that brought em. If they dont want to dance with the devil, refuse the devils funds.

What bothers me about the whole suit is that a couple of homosexuals will be responsible for destroying the entire Meals on Wheels program for the sake of a few bucks in their own pockets. Their sex is more important than millions of elderly people depending on that food.
Homosexuals are just plain sick, no matter how you look at it.

[Bluntpoint]

Like Mr. Trix, Mrs. Prix, Sammy Nix?

[Bluntpoint]

"Homosexuals are just plain sick, no matter how you look at it."

Now bisexuals, they are halfway to sanity and salvation.

[concerned about politics]

Close, but not quite. If it feels good, if it causes no harm to anyone else, and if you are willing to live with and be solely responsible for the potential consequences then, yes, do it if you want to.

Oh good. The homosexuals are starting an AIDs charity so the taxpayers will no longer be responsible for their plagues? No more AIDs funding? Great!
That cuts medical care expences from tax funded programs as well! The Hepititus and massive use of antibiotics to fight intestional and stomach infections too, right? They cost us more than the tobacco company.
It's about time they're held responsible for AIDs deaths to babies and unsuspecting victims. Charge them with manslaughter, too.
You have a great idea there!

[concerned about politics]

Now bisexuals, they are halfway to sanity and salvation.

Only in the illusionary gay utopia.
There's a man/ woman who was going through a sex change operation in CA. who just got fired and lost the insurance coverage that was paying for it. Now, he/she is covered in hair, but has no penis. LOL.
Call the circus! This ones a gold mine! LOL