Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New theory unravels magnetic instability
spaceref.com ^ | 10 Dec 02 | Los Alamos

Posted on 12/10/2002 9:22:22 AM PST by RightWhale

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: RightWhale
ok, I see your point. That effectively kills the idea of a sunblocking satelite, except for perhaps moving natural satelites of size into place around venus. And then you would have to position it in a perfectly synchronous orbit so that it always was in eclipse mode instead of reflecting more sunlight. And then there would be tidal effects that I bet would offset the loss of light.

I'm not sure what percent of the total sunlight is blocked in a Solar Eclipse, but it ends up being a total solar eclipse on only 1/2 of 1% of the earth's surface. Therefore the moon would block more light if it was closer and since the moon is 2000 miles in diameter and Venus' diameter is 80% that of the earths. It seems like even if you had a moon size object closer to Venus that the moon is to earth, you are still only blocking a portion of sunlight.

81 posted on 12/10/2002 5:01:55 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
But the CO2 would just freeze again quickly. All the nukes that the world has won't melt the ice caps. They could contaminate Mars enough to make it uninhabitable (2 prefixes and a suffix) for a long time.
82 posted on 12/10/2002 8:37:22 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
By Kepler's laws, to be synchronous to Venus, you need to be at the same distance from the Sun as Venus.
83 posted on 12/10/2002 8:38:48 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Actually the CO2 will not freeze again quickly in fact the more CO2 and water vapor in the martian atmosphere the warmer the atmosphere will become. That is the point of unfreezeing the CO2 in the first place regardless if you do it quickly with nukes or slowly with a mirror or lense it is the same process. Contamination of the type you suggest is a myth. By the time we are ready to actually settle on the surface of Mars 100-200 years later all radioactivity from the bombs will long be gone. Also the amount of Radioactivity that will linger at the equator (which will be the area we will first be seeding with bacterial, plant, and animal life will be small and will have no deterious effect on the types of life we will be planting there.
84 posted on 12/11/2002 2:48:43 AM PST by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: NukeMan
What has an Isp of 2000 sec?

Various types of electric thrusters -- ion, plasma, or arcjet -- can and do achieve that sort of Isp. (Very low thrust, however.)

85 posted on 12/11/2002 6:45:19 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ckilmer; Eastbound; ...

A Blast from the Past, from a bit more than three years ago.


86 posted on 03/09/2006 9:10:14 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson