Skip to comments.
"Buyer's Remorse" in South Dakota: Some Republicans who voted for Tim Johnson now wish they hadn't.
National Review Online ^
| December 10, 2002
| Byron York
Posted on 12/10/2002 9:00:22 AM PST by xsysmgr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
12/10/2002 9:00:23 AM PST
by
xsysmgr
To: xsysmgr
too late now Morons. Hopefully there is a lot less pork coming your way.
To: xsysmgr
That would be well over 1,500 voters more than enough to make Thune the winner on Election Day. I have reservations about that claim. The RATS would have needed to dig up 1,500 more dead Indians to vote for Johnson.
To: Charlie OK
Too bad for South Dakota; I won't be pheasant hunting there until they have two Repubs in the Senate. Sorry, you lose. Rein in the frootloops, South Dakotans! Get your priorities in order. If you're too lazy to vote for Repubs, you'll all get what you deserve!
4
posted on
12/10/2002 9:07:07 AM PST
by
mallardx
To: Charlie OK
Idiots.
5
posted on
12/10/2002 9:07:13 AM PST
by
Arkie2
To: xsysmgr
And the truth comes out that it wasn't the Red Herring Libertarians but the 'big government 'R's' who turned the election.
6
posted on
12/10/2002 9:10:14 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
To: xsysmgr
Tommy who??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
7
posted on
12/10/2002 9:11:08 AM PST
by
teletech
To: xsysmgr
Stupid is as stupid does. Sounds like they were really socialists anyway.
8
posted on
12/10/2002 9:13:38 AM PST
by
cynicom
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: xsysmgr
Too bad, suckers. You've got a Minority Leader now, about as useless as t*ts on a boar. Deal with it.
10
posted on
12/10/2002 9:13:58 AM PST
by
chimera
To: Paleo Conservative
The RATS would have needed to dig up 1,500 more dead Indians to vote for Johnson. Yep, that's why you wait til all the other precincts have been counted before coming up with the reservation returns.
To: xsysmgr
Cool cover...
12
posted on
12/10/2002 9:17:22 AM PST
by
Jaxter
To: Charlie OK
Could one REALLY be considered a republican who would vote for Tom Daschle's little errand boy?
To: floriduh voter
Ping!
To: JohnGalt
The DEAD Herring Libertarians also HELPED to put Little Tom's errand boy back into the Senate...the DEAD FISH Libertarians are hurting this country...they serve to help elect democrats, and are good for a laugh when one takes a look at the canidates who dye themselves blue, or have campaign photos with their pet ferretts.
To: Joe Brower
Was it a Democrat that said "the only good Indian is a dead Indian?"
16
posted on
12/10/2002 9:24:02 AM PST
by
crystalk
To: xsysmgr
Well, voting on the basis of peripheral issues turns them into primary issues, there's no getting around that. Shouldn't be a big surprise to anyone.
To: Impeach the Boy
That does not hold up using simple political calculus.
An L vote is worth a -1, since according to the theory that Libertarians hurt the GOP, it only counts as a loss of one vote or the equivalent of staying home. A D vote is worth -2, the vote the D gets and the vote you lose.
Now, since Thune moved to the left on Social Security to battle for these either/or voters and lost, what does that say about Thune the politician?
18
posted on
12/10/2002 9:26:31 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
To: xsysmgr
But, but...I thought the Losertarians were responsible for Thune's defeat....NOT!!!
To: xsysmgr
BASTARDS!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson