Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Next Steps: Why the Democrats lost, and where they go from here (a Democrat perspective)
The American Prospect ^ | 11-12-02 | Ruy Teixeira (co-author of The Emerging Democratic Majority)

Posted on 11/29/2002 8:23:13 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2002 8:23:13 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Good, solid moderate advice from Ruy Teixeira. However scant chance the Democratic Party will heed it in the interim to regain the lost ground needed to gain a national majority in Congress and the statehouses.
2 posted on 11/29/2002 8:30:03 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Quite an intelligent piece actually. I largely agree with it, although just what the Dems can say about the economy (other than that it is bad if it is bad), or about education given their imprisonment by the teachers' union, other than that bogus and expensive smaller class size issue, escapes me.
3 posted on 11/29/2002 8:30:30 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Voters want to know what the Democrats are going to do to make them feel safer;

As long as the Dimocraps think national security is about feelings, they will continue to lose.

4 posted on 11/29/2002 8:39:56 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
First, they need a national-security policy that is a plausible alternative to the Republicans

The democRATS have been anti-military so long, any national security plan they come up with will be justifiably viewed with sceptisim.

Second, they need a domestic-policy agenda that goes beyond prescription drugs and defending Social Security. That starts with a clear approach to improving the economy and should probably also include new programs in education

The democRTAS response to everything seems to be - spend more money. Any domestic-policy agenda the democRTAS come up with will be bound to follow the same ploicy. But for the government to spend more money means more taxes, which will have a chilling effect on the economy. The new programs in education obviously means an increase in spending, as will any domestic-policy agenda that goes beyond prescription drugs and defending Social Security

Finally, avoid an unproductive debate on mobilization versus winning over swing voters

Without winning over swing voters, the democRATS have no hope of winning elections, no matter how mobolized their base is.

5 posted on 11/29/2002 8:41:30 PM PST by Badger1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
These people have a screw lose. Here we go with the gallop pole caught a surge.

People change very little as a campaign progresses. It takes a major outsice stimulus to change thigs. If some of these book writers would actually go out and poll they would find the margins change very little compared to the turn out. People were pretty well decided weeks before the election.

A presidents coming and going is not a big deal unless what he does effects the get out the vote efforts. In this last election the Repubicans for the first time in my memory has a ground game. Rove had proved in 2000 with some experimental precincts that real live local people calling voters increased repubican turn out by 5.2 percent.

So this time in 41 states Republicans used real local people to make calls to registered voters. A lot of the people at the Bush rallies were the people recruited to contact voters. They got a real pep talk about working to get out the vote. They left and did exactly that. In a state with 1.5 million republican votes that made a differnce of about 80,000 votes. It made a real difference.

But those of you who have been following Louisiana know that the differnece between the polls is turnout. IN louisiana that is black turn out and white turn out. One pollster counted black turn out at 28 percent. He showed a big big Landrieu win. The problem is the highest Black turn out in hisory is 26 percent and 23 percent is the average. If you use 25 percent it shows a Terrell victory. 26 percent shows a tie. 27 percent a landriew victory and 28 a Landrieu blow out.Most of the pulblic polls in the 2002 election exagerated the Black turn out. Most of the public polls in 2000 underestimated the Black turn out.

The nation is gradually trending right. The majority of State legislatures are under Republican control for the first time since 1932. The Republicans have a majority of state legislatures. They have both houses of congress and the presidency.

The biggest change I see is that Democrats are mostly running liberal democrats for office. For the most party the Republicans are runing people who can win. They ran a leftist Coleman in Minnesota. They ran a very centrist in Missouri. They ran a centrist in New Hampshire and North Carolina. They ran conservatives in Georgia and Texas.

I think the democrats are running people who toe the party line. The repubicans are running people who can win.

That means the conservatives will run the nation for the nest few years.

If the democrats don't stop running on gut reactions they are going to be out on their a$$.


6 posted on 11/29/2002 8:46:28 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
It may not make any difference what the democrats do. The country is moving a little to the right, the Republicans are moving towards the center, and the Democrats are moving further to the left.

I would expect more gains in the next elections.

7 posted on 11/29/2002 8:46:42 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Where will the democrats go from here?

My suggestion would be hell.

However, if they went to hell, my sympathies would be with the devil.
8 posted on 11/29/2002 8:47:13 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: GraniteStateConservative
"The Emerging Democratic Majority"? I think he wrote that book 20 years too late. He should rename the book:
"THE EMERGING DEMOCRATIC BLAME GAME EXPANSION".
10 posted on 11/29/2002 8:51:41 PM PST by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
What the Democrats really need to do is to get back to basics: confiscatory tax policy, racial quotas, appeasement of terrorists and despots, abortion on demand, and foreign policy dictated by the UN. These are positions that all Americans can get behind. Daschle & Pelosi, are you listening??
11 posted on 11/29/2002 8:55:14 PM PST by Chest Rockwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Know Not The Hour
There was no issue to cause a material secular swing against the "in" party. Bush skillfully denied the opposition that by focusing the issue on national security, and triangulating on the mommy issues. I don't consider the election a critical election. The movement on the ground was minimal, and mostly due to low Democrat turnout.
12 posted on 11/29/2002 8:56:42 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chest Rockwell
ANd don't forget deep defense cuts. The weaker our military is, the better for Dems.
13 posted on 11/29/2002 8:59:14 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Nice reply.

My instincts tell me that the reasoned Democrats (are there any?) will be at odds with the wacky left in the party. This will make for a cocktail of deviousness and shrillness. In the meantime, Bush and company will not be sitting on their hands. The President has the initiative and the momentum. He will define the next battle and many battles thereafter. It will be an uphill run for the Dems. FWIW.

14 posted on 11/29/2002 9:06:13 PM PST by VRW Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
bump for later
15 posted on 11/29/2002 9:06:33 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Ruy Teixeira is a senior fellow at The Century Foundation. His new book, with John Judis, The Emerging Democratic Majority, was just published by Scribner.

I saw this guy's book. It reads like Mein Kampf. The basic premise is that whites are becoming extinct in their own country, once the majority population is non-white third world immigrants, domination by democratic socialists will be guaranteed, and the US will become just as progressive as all the other central/south american states.

16 posted on 11/29/2002 9:08:29 PM PST by Godel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
The rats lost because they are still trying to sell the same old stuff that worked in 1932. They are so caught up defending each of their core groups that they have become void of anything new. Watch what happens to them when GWB makes tort reform #1 on the list. What will they do then?
17 posted on 11/29/2002 9:08:52 PM PST by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Why did they lose?

Bill and Walter mourning Paul Wellstone.

18 posted on 11/29/2002 9:10:41 PM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
IMO the extremely close margin in the 2000 election woke up a lot of Pubbies. The fear factor is a wonderful thing. It put the fear of God in Pubbie voters in the suburbs and rural areas.

On voting day this year, I saw a retirement home bus pull up to the polling place. This was in the Republican suburbs and I'd imagine those voters were largely Republican. The Dems DON'T have a lock on the senior citizen vote or the woman vote, no matter what they claim.

19 posted on 11/29/2002 9:10:48 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson