[Koblenz]

I have a very basic question: Why do homosexuals want this? Seriously. Gay couples don't have kids naturally, and thus all of the custody issues don't really apply. Adoption is an issue, but they can adopt now, and marriage might make it a bit easier, but there'll still be roadblocks. Taxes: they'll pay more. Pooling of assets: they can have all joint checking accounts now, buy real estate together, etc. So what do they really gain? The ability to visit their "spouse" in the hospital after visiting hours? The ability for one to change his name to the last name of his partner? do they do that?

[DWSUWF]

When faggots (or fagettes) get married, who wears the tux?

Or do the homos both wear a tux? Or a dress?

Who throws the bouquet?

Who carries who over the threshold?

And, in the case of male queers, who gets custody of the 'kids' when they're born?

Do they just flush them, or what?

[Aquinasfan]

The last poll I saw on this issue in Massachusetts was 58-42% against. Not very encouraging.

[logic101.net]

I still can't see the advantage these people see in marrage, other than legitimizing thier twisted life-style. They will be paying more in taxes!


MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/