Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More high-income Americans go without health insurance
USA Today ^ | 11/22/02 | Julie Appleby

Posted on 11/22/2002 9:50:39 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:06 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Jim Noble
....but why should I buy health insurance now when I know the government is about to start stealing money from young workers to give it to me for nothing?

Because, knowing Hillary, she'd try to do something cute to contain costs (i.e. push them to the insurance carriers) by "redlining" "pre-existing conditions" and putting those costs to the old carrier under some sort of transitional-period gobbledygook of the sort you'd expect from America's smartest woman lawyer.

41 posted on 06/19/2003 3:13:50 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Jim Noble
Oh, and she'd probably try to get us to pay for it, too, with "premiums" (taxes) disguised as your "contributory portion".....means-tested, of course, which is Ratspeak for "we'll carry our constituents as much as possible and shove the costs to the productive people -- they're all Republicans anyway".
43 posted on 06/19/2003 3:19:06 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
I'm actually quite well-insured.

However, the wealthy are among the most notorious non-payers for health care services. The widespread folk belief that you shouldn't have to pay for this service is not confined to the poor, or to RATs (just read these threads on FR!).

The poor, however, are not used to getting what they want, and so a few shekels can usually be squeezed out of them.

The very wealthy who are uninsured just don't pay, and they have reasonable lines of defense to keep hospitals' feeble (and doctors even more feeble) collection efforts at bay.

44 posted on 06/19/2003 3:20:05 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
re: I'm actually quite well-insured.)))

Ya think? You might be surprised at what that means. You might be well-insured, but will the insurance company pay the claims of someone who's being billed to cover all the uncompensated care, or will they fight tooth and nail to avoid paying? You never know until you make a claim after paying years of premiums. I'm watching a lot of folks learn this the hard way.

It's easy to blame the insurance companies, but the ones we have are all that's left.

45 posted on 06/19/2003 3:26:04 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
I agree that the insurance you think you have is not necessarily really there.

The flip side of my post to you on the other thread-people figuring out that they don't have to pay the bills-is that the insurance companies are figuring out that they don't have to pay the claims, either.

In both cases, this reflects deeply-held public beliefs that health care services should be free.

Your mommy didn't charge you for milk and cookies when you came home from school, did she?

Your daddy didn't make you file a claim when he put a band-aid on your boo-boo, did he?

So by what right should a heart surgeon or a hospital be sending you a bill?

46 posted on 06/19/2003 3:32:05 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell
The whole concept of insurance with low deductibles, covering things that you can afford to pay for when they happen, is silly in general.

I pay an extra premium for low co-pays through my employer's group plan. It has paid off in spades to have taken advantage of it. You roll the dice and take your chances, eh? For the next guy it might have been a losing proposition.

47 posted on 06/19/2003 3:39:15 AM PDT by Glenn (What were you thinking, Al?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
. . . they have reasonable lines of defense to keep hospitals' feeble (and doctors even more feeble) collection efforts at bay.

Such as?

My insurance, for which I pay over $700 a month, refused to pay for some lab work I had done over a year ago. They are just now, after many phone calls and letters, admitting that they are responsible, and will pay. In the meantime, this is being reflected on my credit report as an unpaid collection.

48 posted on 06/19/2003 3:55:47 AM PDT by Do Be
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie
Would you mind sharing who you have this coverage through?
49 posted on 06/19/2003 4:13:26 AM PDT by Do Be
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell
I know! That "free rider" statement really rankled me.
50 posted on 06/19/2003 4:43:39 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
My husband's employer pays for his health insurance (BCBS traditional) and we have to pay for the coverage of myself and our two daughters. It currently costs us $420 a month and we were just notified the other day that BCBS is raising it's premiums another 25%.

We had BC/BS and the company paid for everything, but as you found, they kept raising rates so eventually the company only covered the employee and part of the dependent cost.

Some of the increases are because health care costs are rising, but there was an article last year in the Philly Inquirer (here) that showed that BC/BS is raising premiums but stashing away large parts of it into cash surpluses, not using it for costs. While it is good to have a cash surplus, theirs seems a little excessive ($3 billion as of last year).

51 posted on 06/19/2003 4:51:44 AM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
A. In 10 years, these people haven't gotten insurance ?..or
B. The figures are the same, the names change ?...or
C. It's a made-up figure?

B.

I was recently w/o insurance for the first time in years. It was brief, but it happened.

52 posted on 06/19/2003 4:52:40 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
A collapse of medical insurance, in its entirety, is inevitable

In this region, only 32% of the population now bothers with health insurance, 34% are on Medicaid or Medicare and 34% have no insurance but expect and get their health care at no charge to them. Insured people are paying for all their own health care plus the health care of those who choose not to pay anything in.

53 posted on 06/19/2003 6:00:38 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
Look at JFK. He had all the "doctoring" his fame and money could buy.

Like Elvis. He had a lot of doctors and a lot of medical care.

54 posted on 06/19/2003 6:01:59 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
In this region, only 32% of the population now bothers with health insurance, 34% are on Medicaid or Medicare and 34% have no insurance but expect and get their health care at no charge to them. Insured people are paying for all their own health care plus the health care of those who choose not to pay anything in.

The People are socializing medicine all on their own!

55 posted on 06/19/2003 6:03:04 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson