Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/11/2002 9:34:26 AM PST by VANHALEN2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: VANHALEN2002
Gentlemen, prepare to defend yourselves... if you can. I hope I'll be seeing you real soon Mr Hussein
103 posted on 11/11/2002 11:38:27 AM PST by McCloud-Strife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
There is no other option other than.... Ka-Boom!
104 posted on 11/11/2002 11:49:14 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
If the committee is recommending that Iraq reject UN's terms, they must think 1 of 2 things:

1. US will not act on the terms of the UN agreement (an extremely stupid assumption that I do not think Iraq is taking)

2. Iraq has something up its sleeve, as in nuclear weapons or otherwise that the committee believes will deter the US from following through.

I urge caution
106 posted on 11/11/2002 11:57:40 AM PST by anobjectivist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
I read that the committee isn't going to "vote" on this until tomorrow, and then Saddamned decides. Now won't he just eat that up? "All the eyes of the whole Earth are on me, blah, blah, blah" "Everyone is waiting on MY decision, blah, blah, blah..." Yuk! This guy is so nuts that it is hard for me to even try to guess what he'll do. I still think that in the end he will either:

1. Be the whimp that he is and slither on up to the camera and say "I accept the Resolution, blah, blah, blah..." OR

2. He will try to do a surprise attack against us (US-activate sleeper cells, etc) and Israel FIRST before he goes down. That way he will go out in the "Blaze of Glory" that he is worthy of.

110 posted on 11/11/2002 1:00:35 PM PST by Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
I expect that the 'Iraq Committee' is just saying what they expect that Saddam Hussein demands that they say in order to stay alive another day.
111 posted on 11/11/2002 1:03:47 PM PST by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
I certainly hope that they reject it. Then the UN will have to put up or shut up. Either way our "dumb" president will have outwitted both the UN and Iraq.

Nuke 'em till they glow then shoot 'em in the dark!!

113 posted on 11/11/2002 1:20:18 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
Set us up the Bomb!

All your base are belong to us!

114 posted on 11/11/2002 1:25:38 PM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
According to an international lawyer, Anne Bayefsky, writing in today's Sun, the resolution that passed 15 to 0 is not that great for the U.S., as it inhibits our ability to justify going to war. Breaches are simply reported to the Security Council for assessment, according to the resolution. She closes her piece by saying "Saddam Hussein has real friends at the U.N."

More strategery? Saddam rejects a deeply flawed resolution---aw shucks.

118 posted on 11/11/2002 2:58:14 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VANHALEN2002
How many votes in the Iraqi Parliament are needed to override a Saddam veto?
119 posted on 11/11/2002 4:42:12 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson