Skip to comments.
Navy's use of sonar halted, to spare whales
The Seattle Times ^
| Nov 01, 2002
| Kenneth R. Weiss
Posted on 11/01/2002 4:37:34 AM PST by Pern
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: AppyPappy
Sonobuoys are usually passive devices. Drop them in a known pattern, listen, and you can tell if someone is there, where they are going, and how fast. But the target has to be making noise.
21
posted on
11/01/2002 6:40:46 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: Jeff Head; Poohbah
FYI ping.
This is complete BS. A judge can dictate the operational procedures for the U.S. military?
22
posted on
11/01/2002 6:49:23 AM PST
by
hchutch
To: hchutch
See SURTASS LFA for complete info on this subject.
23
posted on
11/01/2002 7:00:50 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: free me
Not even a real judge. The federal courts have propogated themselves by creating (with the connivance of Congress) a class of under-judges who actually do a lot of the real judges' work. They are not appointed by the president.
To: stuartcr; AppyPappy; grobdriver; All
Okay, understand that my comments here are EXTREMELY limited, for reasons which will become obvious.
I am in the business of subhunting myself, aboard the mighty P-3 ORION ASW aircraft. In particular, I work with underwater acoustics and sonar. Matter of fact, I am an Instructor of them.
Rest easy if y'all are worried. This descision will NOT bother us to any great extent. That's all I can say.
25
posted on
11/01/2002 7:14:17 AM PST
by
Long Cut
To: Stingray51
I know. Fake judges appointed by judges. Who are they accountable to I don't know.
26
posted on
11/01/2002 7:19:58 AM PST
by
free me
To: Pern
...and in other news, the Air Force was denied airspace near 12 bird sanctuaries where the loud jets had scared migrant birds. The jets may fly only during war.
The Army, today, also announced that training with those nasty cannons and tanks would halt for they scare ground hogs on the firing range. The guns may only be fired during war.
To: Long Cut
I am in the business of subhunting myself, aboard the mighty P-3 ORION ASW aircraft. In particular, I work with underwater acoustics and sonar. Matter of fact, I am an Instructor of them. Rest easy if y'all are worried. This descision will NOT bother us to any great extent. That's all I can say. Hey, shipmate.
Ex-AX1 IFT NATOPS instructor here. -Bs, B-MODs and Charlie Update IIs (what a piece of junk - but you may know that).
Glad to hear the Do What's Right attitude is alive and well in my Navy.
Pull chocks. Fly Safe.
To: Long Cut
Thank you for your service and 'quiet' remarks.
29
posted on
11/01/2002 7:26:17 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
To: Long Cut; Grampa Dave; Poohbah
Perhaps, but I do not like the notion of judges making major decisions about operational procedures.
And this qualifies as one case where there is severe overreach. The Greens have not proven there is a link between the LFA sonar and harm to marine mammals. Hopefully, this decision will be overturned. I can see the military being told to monitor the effects better, but taking this tool out of their hands is NOT a good thing.
I can imagine the paraphrased line from Blackhawk Down used in a briefing: "Now, we have a couple of SURTASS LFA arrays that we wanted to use, but a federal judge, in all his wisdom, rejected that request. Too dangerous for the whales. So the advance ASW warning will have to come from P-3s and a small group of frigates ahead of the main convoy."
30
posted on
11/01/2002 7:26:31 AM PST
by
hchutch
To: grobdriver
Nice to "meet" you, grob. AW1, Update III, UYS-1, AIP USQ-78A,B SENSOR-1 Instructor BUMP to ya, Shippy!
31
posted on
11/01/2002 7:30:06 AM PST
by
Long Cut
To: free me
Elizabeth LaPorte
Somehow, she looks exactly like I expcted her to.
To: Pern
Just where in the Constitution does it say that some judge can stop the navy from doing anything outside our borders? If Bush has any balls left he will tell this pig to cram her order in a stinky place.
33
posted on
11/01/2002 7:42:53 AM PST
by
SUSSA
To: hchutch; All
Oh, don't get me wrong, I strongly dislike the idea, myself. As noted, we on active duty must deal with the watermelons and their nonsense on a constant basis.
All I'm saying is, don't sweat THIS one. We've got your back, America. BTW, ORIONs are more than up to the task, thank you. My life and career are devoted to just that goal, and there are a LOT like me.
Slick didn't drive us ALL away...
34
posted on
11/01/2002 7:52:07 AM PST
by
Long Cut
To: Cincinatus
LOL! Hey, she said they could use it if we were at war. Aren't we at war now?
35
posted on
11/01/2002 8:00:46 AM PST
by
free me
To: All
This is a prime example of why every enviral organization in American needs to have their books audited to see how much money has come from the Opecker Princes and the Mullahs of Iran and maybe the Mass Murderers of Iraq.
Natural Resources Defense Council would appear to have received funding from Iran or the ChiComs to push this in a court.
If we can ever open the books of the Enviral Whacko Organizations to follow the money of who contributes to them, a lot of eyes will be opened.
To: Long Cut
If you truly want to track subs, and not have to go home and re-fuel for 2 or 3 months, then you should ride a SURTASS boat.
37
posted on
11/01/2002 9:26:52 AM PST
by
stuartcr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson