Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy Scouts to Atheist: Accept A God or Get Out
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 10/30/02 | Michael L. Betsch

Posted on 10/30/2002 3:39:31 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241 next last
To: Stone Mountain
Sorry, Mr. Mountain, but that was such as stupid post that I believe I'll come back for a second lick.

You know, I swam nekkid as a kid (and, with convivial company as an adult too ;)) numerous times. I actually like swimming nekkid. What does that mean according to the gay sources you cite? Read for comprehension, man.

My daughter (3 years old) like to run around nekkid after her bath. At times, I have photographed these episodes because they are cute as heck. I laugh every time I see her little butt streaking around the house. What dark impulses do I repress?

Please. If nitwits wish to rule, please found your own damn country and foster your own sick organizations.
181 posted on 11/01/2002 9:39:43 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: RonF
That's real nice Ron. Out of gas?
182 posted on 11/01/2002 9:42:45 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
If Cthulhu or Zeus or Odin or Osiris or Amaterasu Omikami exists, and you claim the Christian God exists, what happens?

Besides, I do have something to lose. I may not have much, but I would like to think that I have intellectual honesty, but asserting the existence of a god that I do not think exists would deprive me of that here, in this lifetime. (Besides, don't the Christian and Jewish gods think lying is a sin? If I assert something that I don't really think is true, then surely I lie even if my judgment is mistaken.)
183 posted on 11/01/2002 9:49:08 PM PST by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
BTW, He doesn't choose hell for people. They want nothing to do with God, and He grants them their hearts desire. He won't force Himself on anyone.

If someone leaves a glittering knife in front of a baby, we don't blame the baby for the injury it does itself--how much more responsible then is an omniscient, omnipotent god who creates a universe, knowing exactly what will happen.

184 posted on 11/01/2002 9:59:35 PM PST by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I see. We know the Bible is true because it says so right there in the Bible!
185 posted on 11/01/2002 10:01:36 PM PST by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jejones
An adult is not a baby. And those who reject God (or decide not to decide) know exactly what they are doing.

All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. As such, we are unable to stand before a Holy God who cannot look upon sin. We therefore need an advocate before God. That Advocate is Jesus Christ who lived a sinless life in your place, shed His blood to pay the penalty of your sin, and provides the sinner justification (paid in full) before God. The choice is only to believe in the finished work of Christ and trust Him (and Him alone) for your salvation.

There you have the choice laid out before you and are now without excuse. U decide.

186 posted on 11/02/2002 3:35:42 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: jejones
If Cthulhu or Zeus or Odin or Osiris or Amaterasu Omikami exists, and you claim the Christian God exists, what happens?

I made no such assertion or claim to a Christian God.

I stated, "God is that than which there is no greater" with no preference or reference to any sect.

And if you're worried about intellectual honesty, you can start by not putting assumptions that don't exist in an opposing argument. =)

Besides, how can one lie if one doesn't know a truth? You assert that you do not "think" that God exists, then claim that a positive assertion would be a lie - when you have no proof one way or the other. I would tend to call it a statement of rational positioning based upon a logical calculation without any evidence contrary.

187 posted on 11/02/2002 5:04:15 AM PST by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
I stated, "God is that than which there is no greater" with no preference or reference to any sect.

I went back to the post to which I replied; you stated no such thing...and now we know your level of intellectual honesty.

188 posted on 11/02/2002 5:17:30 AM PST by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: jejones
I did not.

tit for tat, isn't this fun?

You didn't reference any particular post (I have a few on this thread), and I did not reference any Christian Diety, but I did define what "God" must be in order to be "God".

Maybe you just don't want to admit that you can't argue with someone who doesn't accept your false assertions.

189 posted on 11/02/2002 6:07:20 AM PST by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I don't believe that because someone is not a Christian, that they have rejected God, besides, just what does it mean to reject God? I don't understand how someone could reject the fact that they were created. I do not believe that we are all sinners. What exactly is the glory of God?
190 posted on 11/02/2002 7:07:47 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
Feeling and instances of good things do not contitute evidence or justification of anything.

The fact is that I've seen Scouts develop quite well in units where the Scoutmaster was female. You're saying that this observation is useless. If you deny the usefulness of direct evidence, we have little else to talk about.

191 posted on 11/02/2002 7:50:32 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; RonF
Polybius, I can appreciate your situation just as much as I can that of RonF. However, you seem to labor under the same kind of thought that dominates everything else in society today. That is, if something 'good' can come from the distortion of some ideal or standard, then discarding the ideal is justified and will yield benefits. Yeah, right. The evidence is so abundant.

Good intentions or hoped for outcomes do not justify the cavalier disregard for absolute values and the embodiment of those truths in ethics established in other ages. It is called tradition and it has meaning to the wise.

To my thinking, you make the case for the current assault on Scouting. That is, what is wrong with gay Scoutmasters if they mean well and are sincere? Further, if one gay Scoutmaster can be found that does a good job and is well liked, isn't that an endorsement for liberalizing Scouting policies?
**************************

Well, WCF, you will be hard pressed to find someone more traditional or observant of traditional values in modern American society than I am.

I’m a Cuban American. The families of the1960’s wave of Cuban refugees had been dealing heavily with “Americans” since the early 1800’s. They were “Americanized”. However, their “Americanization” was from contact with the pre-1960’s America. You know, the “Amerika” that is sooooooo Politically Incorrect nowadays.

What this means is that while a large percentage of Baby Boomer Americans were growing up in the 1960’s as spoiled brats engaging in free love, doing drugs and putting down “Amerika” we were growing up in the traditional values of the America of the 1940’s. While a large percentage of Baby Boomer Americans were burning their draft cards, my uncle, my brother, my sister and myself put in a combined total of 46 years of active duty and Reserve time in the U.S. Armed Forces.....and not one of us was ever drafted. We volunteered.

If a World War One and a World War Two soldier were magically transported by time machine from the battlefields of 1918 and 1944 and transported to America in 2002, that American would fit right in and feel right at home in my “Cuban American” home even though I have had to “train” a Liberal California-born wife.

However, if those two soldiers were transported to the “typical American culture” of my town on the Left Coast, they would be wondering what Planet they had landed on.

In late 1960, at the age of 6, I came to the USA from Cuba as the youngest of 8 first cousins. We came with our parents and the clothes we had in our suitcases. My father used to be a hospital administrator in Cuba. In the U.S., he drove a taxi for many years before he died when I was 16. One of my uncles was a lawyer in Cuba. In the U.S., he pumped gas for many years.

Forty years later, every single one of my first cousins and I each own our own businesses and each one of us is a self-made millionaire. In addition, I’m a retired U.S. Navy Commander having given the Navy 20 years of active and Reserve service while declining retirement benefits.

You don’t get that kind of a family resume without tradition and without traditional values.

That being said, I have lived long enough to know that values are constantly changing. Over the years, some American values have change for the better and others for the worse.

When I was a Cub Scout in the early 1960’s, I lived in an America where Dads were hard working World War Two veterans. Public schools were decent and drug-free. Teenaged pregnancy was not as common as teenaged acne.

On the other hand, when we drove to the beach at Key Biscayne, we would drive by a beach called “Virginia Beach” that was the “Negro beach”. As a naïve child, I never knew why it was that the “Negroes” always kept to themselves and didn’t come to swim where everyone else went to swim.

Twenty years later, that old American “ideal or standard” resurfaced again. By then, I was the Medical Officer on a U.S. Navy nuclear cruiser. A Hollywood film company was filming “Winds of War” at our base and had asked the Navy ships for sailors in dress blue bell-bottoms to use as extras in a scene where FDR was meeting Churchill on a Navy ship. The C.O. gave a day’s liberty to a dozen sailors to participate. However, the Hollywood film company sent a couple of sailors back. They were black. “Could we please send them two more white sailors instead since the U.S. Navy in 1941 did not have black sailors in Honor Guards?”, the film company asked.

The C.O. recalled all of our ship’s white sailors and informed the Hollywood film company that they should hire civilians for their extras.

The U.S. Navy of 1982 did not operate under the “ideals or standards” of 1942 in regards to blacks.

Back in 1942, the role of blacks in U.S. society and in the U.S. Navy was “an absolute value and the embodiment of those truths in ethics established in other ages.”

However, times, values and traditions change.

In today’s U.S. Navy, a black in the Ward Room of a U.S. Navy warship can mean a fellow officer and not just a steward serving lunch.

In some other ways, however, America has changed for the worse.

In far too many cases, the hard working World War Two veterans that I knew as “Dads” that supported stay at home Moms in my old neighborhood during my Cub Scout days in the early 60's have been replaced by slackers or absent Dads.

In far too many homes in America today, there simply aren’t Dads or Dad would rather be off smoking a joint with his buddies or spending time at the tavern rather than volunteering for Scouts. In such homes and in communities with a predominance of such homes, women such as my friend have to step in and assume the role of Scoutmaster if her boys and other boys in town are going to be exposed to the ideals of Scouting.

Those are the boys that need Scouting the most in today’s America so they don’t end up being like their Dads.

Such issues do not affect my son. Not at this time.

I can guarantee you that my son will end up at the top of the societal economic food chain and be brought up with good conservative role models. When the school system in our town offered no acceptable alternative for middle school, I simply hired a top notch, Christian teacher and set up our own private school for my two kids and seven other kids. I have the conservative values and the financial resources to be able to afford to do that for my two kids and be able to financially subsidize the education of some other people’s kids while I’m at it.

However, that does not mean that I afford to not care if the rest of America’s kids from less than ideal family situations flush themselves down the toilet of life.

Conservatives are an endangered species in America. If America is to survive in the future, it needs Conservative values. The Boy Scouts of America is an organization that instills those values…….even to boys and entire communities of boys who are unfortunate enough today to have absent or slacker Dads.

Such issues will affect my son in the future when he will have to try to preserve what is good in America but may find out that hardly any other men share his Conservative American values because they simply were never even exposed to such values when they were boys.

In 1987, even though the BSA had won a U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of the policy excluding females, the BSA National Executive Board removed the "female exclusion" from Scouting totally. Link

I had nothing to do with that decision, WCF. Fifteen years ago, my son who is now about to go for his Second Class Board of Review was not even born yet.

You are criticizing me for accepting the fact that, after a 33 year absence from any involvement in Scouting, the Boy Scouts of America has changed since the 1960’s just as America has changed.

Ron F and I did not change this aspect of Scouting, WCF…….. the BSA National Executive Board did……….fifteen years ago in 1987.

I can see the reasons why this change was made and I agree with them as I have stated above. However, WCF, your beef is not with Ron F nor with me. Your beef is with the BSA National Executive Board decision that was made before most active Boy Scouts today were ever born.

192 posted on 11/02/2002 8:44:20 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
All those questions are answered in the Word of God.

1. Jesus said you are either for Him or against Him.
2. Many reject the Creator and even the concept of their having been created. These typically assume we live in a mechanistic universe in which the creation is in control. They therefore reject the Creator in favor of the creation.
3. God says all have sinned and those who claim to be sinless are liars.
4. The glory of the Lord is His perfection - see the Word of God again.

You're argument isn't with me but with God and the fact that He has already spoken.

193 posted on 11/02/2002 10:08:38 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Well put, if I may say so. And, thank you.

By the way, I have an update for the "History of Scouting" link you posted. It said that as of 1992, there were no female Council Executives. However, at this time, there is one, in the Chicago area.
194 posted on 11/02/2002 11:51:20 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I have no arguement with anyone. I just don't understand why you believe what you do, and others believe what they do, yet both claim to be correct. All I believe in is God the Creator of all. I understand that God is beyond my human comprehension, and I don't believe others that claim to know the word of God.
195 posted on 11/03/2002 2:13:06 PM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
He is not a God who would leave you in the dark about Himself. He is the lover of our souls, and has revealed Himself through His Word. I recommend you read it before you reject it. It is possible to know Him and to be completely assured of His heaven. "These things are written that you may KNOW you have eternal life." I John 5
196 posted on 11/03/2002 3:10:55 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven." - Hebrews 1:1-3

197 posted on 11/03/2002 3:20:43 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Given #197 - if you have seen the Son, you have seen the Father.
198 posted on 11/03/2002 3:21:24 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I have read enough of the bible to not be convinced that it is the unerring word of God anymore so than any other book written by men. I don't reject it, it is a very good history book, with many good lessons in it. I have already come to believe we have some form of eternal life, without the bible.
199 posted on 11/04/2002 6:09:38 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Just because you say given...doesn't really make it so for those that do not believe as you do.
200 posted on 11/04/2002 6:11:37 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson