Posted on 10/30/2002 3:01:42 AM PST by kattracks
McCauley's statement is totally unbelievable.
You should have heard her sound off on her discoveries re the "scary" Middle Eastern connection back before she started corresponding (and flirting) with "Timmy"!
TXnMA (No Longer!!!)
BTW - no facts are given above by McCauley, only attacks.
I don't know if I'd want a lot of people to know that.
However, she does not make a case for dismissing the notion out of hand as being no more credible than space alien abductions and Elvis sightings.
I'm sure that 'because they don't agree with the party line' is sufficiently good reason to Ms. McCauley.
I agree with thinden that: McCauley's statement is totally unbelievable.
...and with flamefront that: BTW - no facts are given above by McCauley, only attacks.
----------------
I know that many of you -- as I do -- admire and appreciate the long years of persistent work Jayna Davis has done -- gathering evidence and struggling to get someone to act upon it. And I can tell by your comments that many of you are hoping and praying that Specter or Burton -- or someone in authority -- will finally take action on all the evidence Jayna has gathered on the ME/OKC connection.
IMHO, Jayna (along with her evidence) constitutes America's best hope of peeling back the sham of lies that the FBI and the OK government have smeared over the bombing of the MFB.
If any of you on the (lengthy) "OKC Ping List" feel so led, I'm sure that Jayna would appreciate a supportive e-mail to her at jayna@jaynadavis.com. And, if you haven't done so already, why not visit Jayna's website at http://www.jaynadavis.com ...
It's time to FReep Jayna with a BIG show of FR support! Let Jayna know that she has lot of FReepers rooting for her!
TXnMA (No Longer!!!)
Thousands???? Is she lumping 9/11 together with OKC?
No, Cate. The worst case of misinformation might be the FBI's smear of Richard Jewell, or its smear of Dr. Hatfill, or its in-your-face denial of eighty people who saw a missile hit TWA Flight 800, or the media which now ignores sniper Mohammad's jihad motivation.
The McVeigh appellate team spent months pouring over all of the case files
"pouring"? Or "poring"? Cate is pouring cold water on Jayna Davis' facts--not "reading, studying attentively, pondering".
But, I don't like the fact that she's standing on the graves of thousands of people."
What "thousands", Cate? Quit smoking crack.
"You can't cling to things you want," McCauley concluded, "and ignore the things you don't like."
Cate, when you sober up, try taking your own advice.
The article is lazy journalism, putting a microphone in front of a homeless person at a bus stop who says she's Catherine the Great.
Gotta go with Jayna Davis for consistency, beating the street to get the story--and sticking to fact, not crack.
Davis claimed she tried to surrender the 22 witness statements and corroborating documentation she uncovered to the FBI in 1997, but requested that agents sign a notarized receipt for the evidence. She said, after consulting with "the legal department," they refused to accept the documents.
FBI Agent Dan Vogel told the LA Weekly in a Sept. 28, 2001, interview that the litigation made agents wary of accepting the documents.
Sorry, this is gonna be a waste of time. The excuse given by the FBI doesn't pass the smell test.
Davis claimed she tried to surrender the 22 witness statements and corroborating documentation she uncovered to the FBI in 1997, but requested that agents sign a notarized receipt for the evidence. She said, after consulting with "the legal department," they refused to accept the documents.
FBI Agent Dan Vogel told the LA Weekly in a Sept. 28, 2001, interview that the litigation made agents wary of accepting the documents.
Sorry, this is gonna be a waste of time. The excuse given by the FBI doesn't pass the smell test.
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) met Oct. 10 with Davis, a former investigative reporter for an Oklahoma City television station, about an alleged connection between McVeigh and foreign terrorists. Specter told Davis her claim "warrants an inquiry."
"We will pursue it," Specter said, after hearing a one-hour presentation from Davis.
Easily refutable? Apparently the Senior Senator from Pennsylvania is not in agreement with the former TV reporter.
Pushing forward this investigation could be the key to burying the Clintoon's influence forever!
bump...the Rats! Vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.