Gaffney: Saddam Possibly Tied to Oklahoma City

Fox News ^ | Wednesday, October 23, 2002 | Frank Gaffney, Jr.

[armourup]

Ah yes...the "KENNEDY ASSASINATION 39 YEARS AGO".

IN "Kill Zone" the best of the Kennedy assasination books (unlike others that mostly detailed how he was killed) is detailed WHO killed Kennedy.

George the elder was over some black ops CIA team that coordinated the different elements of the coup. The only reason George Jr. is president is to protect all the good ole boys. After you're president you know everything so Clinton is untouchable.

Don't get me wrong; I support Dubya, he is by far the lesser of two evils and I can hardly blame him for protecting his daddy.

[armourup]

Mcvey was one of only one or two crimminals Clinton's Justice Dept. persued for the death penalty during their 8 years. Why? Why didn't Mcvey get a new trial after it was found the FBI withheld huge amounts of info? Mcvey SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED! But not until he stewed for a few years to soften him up for more info. He unfortunately got his swift justice.

[dcwusmc]

When you can provide FACTS that back up your nonsensical non-responses, you may be worthy of attention. Until then bugger off. I did my twenty-two PLUS years in the Marine Corps so I have enough background to speak with knowledgeable authority. I also read the news and I have heard nothing which would tell me we have anything more than a president with a desire to go to war with Iraq who is grasping at straws, looking for a reason. I do not trust ANYONE who wants war just for the sake of "UN Resolutions" or "regime changes." Neither is sufficient justification for sending our young men off to die. Both smack of "Pax Americana" and Empire-building. Which are not provided for in the Constitution I swore an oath to protect and defend. If there is LEGITIMATE cause to go to war, then fine. If it can be SHOWN that Saddam Insane was linked DIRECTLY to 9-11 or even to OKC, he should become dead. But right now dubya's just flying trial balloons, drumming up support for a so-far UN-justified preemptive attack on Iraq.

[dcwusmc]

See post 63. Are you willing to put your own life on the line for a U.N. Resolution? I will fight to the death to keep MY son from dying for that worthless international cluster f*ck. If YOU are willing, get one of their blue beanies and go to. Leave this country out of it. In fact, get US out of the UN and the UN out of the US. Learn to spell check. Whatever. Just don't get us involved in a war without GOOD, SPECIFIC reasons which pertain to the UNITED STATES, not the United NATIONS. If Saddam was, as it appears, involved with OKC, make the case to Congress and the people on THAT basis, get a Declaration of War from Congress, mobilize the Nation and go to it. Leave the rest out of it. Especially as it now appears that he was NOT necessarily involved in 9-11. Now that the Czech Premier has denied the reports of the meets between Atta and Iraqi intel.

[Endeavor]

Thanks for your military service.

Scr*w your ideology.

[Fledermaus]

Are you willing to put your own life on the line for a U.N. Resolution?

Ah...I see U.N. is your buzzword to stop reading exactly what I wrote.

I was talking about the fact that a cease-fire agreement is being broken. I added the U.N. resolutions because they exist, you can't think them away! I did not use them as the reason to get rid of Saddam.

What other buzzwords get you off? I'll be sure to ignore them.

[dcwusmc]

I read what you posted. Sorry, not good enough. Why is dubya so insistent on going after Saddam NOW when he has not linked him to 9-11? The one POTENTIAL link has vanished... Why divert attention from the actual killers and their KNOWN support network? Especially when it is KNOWN to U.S. authorities that in the immediate aftermath of 9-11, some of the most virulent anti-American, pro-Islam propaganda videos were being produced in the western reaches of China, near the Afghan border. Yet no one mentions that. It's all about Saddam and finding some excuse to do him at the cost of being diverted from a REAL enemy. I have no problem with Saddam being made dead. I do NOT want it done on some flimsy pretext or UN resolution. That gives the UN authority over US which they should not have. If you MUST do him now, bypass the UN and do it because the US has cause.

[timestax]

bttt

[Fledermaus]

Why is dubya so insistent on going after Saddam NOW when he has not linked him to 9-11? The one POTENTIAL link has vanished...

Who said there had to be a link? This is bordering on childish.

I suppose you would have demanded more evidence for FDR to send troops to fight against Germany when we had no evidence they had anything to do with Pearl Harbor.

"But Germany declared war on us also" you say? So has Iraq many times! I suggest you go to the White House website and re-read Bush's September 14, 2001 address to Congress.

By the way, did you think OJ was innocent?

[harpo11]

You sure tagged that man's whole reason for being.

A blubbering blustering him.

My Mom read his Mom's book, and all she talked about is how Billy this, and Billy that, total 100% adoration of her son Billy who could do nothing wrong and the world spins on his axle.

The cover-up surely must have been massive under the Clinton regime. He certainly hired enough rat fink conmen and conwomen to do his dirty work.