Posted on 10/20/2002 11:20:37 AM PDT by Dakotabound
UH oh... don't tell Sungirl... ;-)
I feel it to be excessive in the same way I feel gun control laws to be excessive. And most people don't object to those either.
Gun control laws assume (as in a Bill of Attainder) that everyone who owns a gun will commit a criminal act, and takes a basic right from those who have committed no crime.
Enormous difference. I hate gun control laws. I remember the days when dad could fill out a form and send Herter's a check and a rifle or shotgun would come in the US Mail. I even have a Herter's catalog from that era, which I keep as a reminder of the rights we have already lost. No way am I soft on Gun Control.
But this is no more gun control than taking away the gun from an armed robber. In this case, the basic right to own a firearm is not infringed nor revoked (unless Federal Land makes their poaching a felony), but the firearms used in the crime are forfeit.
That does make a difference. I was under the impression that it was all their firearms. Thank you for the clarification.
Look up the whacking you'd get for a Bald Eagle or spotted Owl (keep in mind a Felony means bye-bye to the littlest peashooter in the closet......)Yikes!
In places, mere urination on the ground (out in the boonies, folks), is just short of a capital offense. ...and never, ever, step on an endangered plant.
The Federal rules are so rabid, I won't hunt Federal Land, despite being just 45 miles from the Little Missouri Grasslands (Mule Deer, upland game birds.).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.