Posted on 10/18/2002 10:45:50 AM PDT by marshmallow
Then by your reasoning anyone should be allowed to wear their religious regalia where ever they like with no limitations. If so, why are public school children forbidden to wear T-shirts with Christian symbols or the name of Jesus imprinted on them? One little boy was sent home from school because his book carrier had a couple of bible verses printed on it, and others have been forbidden to wear the aforementioned T-shirts.
I thought the whole purpose of that specious "wall of separation" liberals love so much was to prevent the state from showing any preference to any religion. So why should this phoney-baloney black muslim be allowed to flaunt the judge's rules of courtroom decorum when the same priviledge wouldn't be granted to a Christian?
And BTW, the last time I was in a courtroom, I had to go through a metal detector and surrender my little Swiss army knife with it's tiny scissors and nail file, so I don't think your Sihk would get his little dagger into that courtroom.
Hellish bump.
Notice the operative in the background, documenting the attack. You can tell he's an undercover fez-wearer by the fact that he's merely traded the fez for a different silly hat...
Some people knew how to treat disrespectful fez-wearers.
Despite all this, Dracula's subjects respected him ... he was so scornful of other nations that when two foreign ambassadors refused to doff their hats to him, he had the hats nailed to their heads.
http://www.royalty.nu/Europe/Balkan/Dracula.html
Well, they have no clothes. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.