Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Byrd Threatens Delay on Iraq Measure
http://abcnews.go.com/ ^ | 10/08/02 | The Associated Press

Posted on 10/08/2002 4:55:02 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
He drives me nuts, too. He rants and raves--he likes to hear himself speak. As Brit Hume said the other night, he represents the actions of the senators of old--the way the Senate was run in the old days. (Something to that affect) Anyway, WV continues to reelect him because he gets mucho money from the fed gov't for the state.
21 posted on 10/08/2002 5:57:54 PM PDT by biss5577
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
Being from Ohio I normally don't take up for West Virginia, but we need to remember that without their 5 electoral votes President Gore would be asking the Congress for a resolution to put Saddam on double-secret probation.
22 posted on 10/08/2002 5:59:28 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Byrd, like Gore, have been in Washington so long that they do not even know thier states. In WVA & TN, both brought home the bacon, thus they kept getting elected. I know algore lost Tn, in 00, I do not know who won WVA, some FReeper can probably help me out, although I think I remember that PGWB won that state also.

You are not going to stop the voting records of the folks in WVA, untill the government programs are reduced and eventually done away with, while being replaced with free enterprise type legislation to help create priviate sector jobs.

Thier Senator Byrd, has not been thier savior, he is the one that has kept them and thier state in economic bondage.

As for Senator Byrd, how can you deliver all that bacon with out being afflicted by high colesteral, some problems take care of themselves in time.
23 posted on 10/08/2002 6:00:26 PM PDT by tall_tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
LOL! UBL was on double secret probation by dean clinton! Nevile Chamberlin Byrd is the ultimate argument for term limits.
24 posted on 10/08/2002 6:03:59 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
Byrd, who has been criticizing the Iraq war resolution daily since the Senate began its debate on the measure last Thursday, told colleagues at a party luncheon that he planned to make full use of Senate rules to try to derail the legislation, participants said.

After the next attack Byrd should be executed on the Capital steps. Post Haste !

25 posted on 10/08/2002 6:05:32 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
Sorry, I disagree, force a vote now, make them defend thier no's at home with the voters.
26 posted on 10/08/2002 6:08:20 PM PDT by tall_tex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
bump
27 posted on 10/08/2002 6:08:57 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk
Bush stuck with Tenet despite numerous calls for his head after September 11. Tenet should walk the plank after today. He deserves it.
28 posted on 10/08/2002 6:10:20 PM PDT by TheExploited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
HIYA AP!!!! Long time no see!
29 posted on 10/08/2002 6:13:49 PM PDT by antivenom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Oh please, let Byrdbrain get up on the floor and rant and rave again ... maybe he'll have an aneurism and shut up for a decade.
30 posted on 10/08/2002 6:15:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TheExploited
Tenet should walk the plank after today. He deserves it.

CIA did such a fine job preventing 9/11--oh, that's right--

George W. Bush
President@whitehouse.gov
Fax: (202) 456-2461

31 posted on 10/08/2002 6:16:10 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Someone needs to take Byrd aside and tell him this:

"Old, Senile and Democratic is no way to go through life son."
32 posted on 10/08/2002 6:21:50 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
40. Dilatory, Absurd, or Frivolous Motions For the convenience of deliberative assemblies, it is necessary to allow some highly privileged motions to be renewed again and again after progress in debate or the transaction of any business, and to allow a single member, by calling for a division, to have another vote taken. If there was no provision for protecting the assembly, a minority of two members could be constantly raising questions of order and appealing from every decision of the chair, and calling for a division on every vote, even when it was nearly unanimous, and moving to lay motions on the table, and to adjourn, and offering amendments that are simply frivolous or absurd. By taking advantage of parliamentary forms and methods a small minority could practically stop the business of a deliberative assembly having short sessions, if there was no provision for such contingency. Congress met it by adopting this rule: "No dilatory motion shall be entertained by the speaker." But, without adopting any rule on the subject, every deliberative assembly has the inherent right to protect itself from being imposed upon by members using parliamentary forms to prevent it from doing the very thing for which it is in session, and which these forms were designed to assist, namely, to transact business. Therefore, whenever the chair is satisfied that members are using parliamentary forms merely to obstruct business, he should either not recognize them, or else rule them out of order. After the chair has been sustained upon an appeal, he should not entertain another appeal from the same obstructionists while they are engaged evidently in trying by that means to obstruct business. While the chair should always be courteous and fair, he should be firm in protecting the assembly from imposition, even though it be done in strict conformity with all parliamentary rules except this one, that no dilatory, absurd, or frivolous motions are allowed.

Should the member who renounced his party affiliation after his election to the body be the determiner of a shift in majority rule, that member shall be deprived of his johnson (which shall be held in escrow adjacent to his tonsils) and his proxy revert to the Minority Leader so as to reestablish the preexisting arrangement, the status quo ante.

[See also, Cloture through battlefield amputation, RRO, Ch. X, ss. 8-11.]

33 posted on 10/08/2002 6:25:39 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
As a former grand dragon klucker byrd's ideas haven't changed. He still doesn't want coloreds in the military and jews are the US's worse enemies.

He tolerates innoway cause he doesn't want to belittle a cripple.

34 posted on 10/08/2002 7:05:26 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tall_tex
I don't know what everyone's problem is with Byrd doing this. Putting the vote off a week works to the GOP's advantage: it's an additional week where the focus on the war vote will prevent the Democrats from demagauging the economy, medicare, social security, etc.

In his senility, Byrd is actually doing the GOP a HUGE favor ... allowing the President to play to his strengths going into the elections.
35 posted on 10/08/2002 7:40:35 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy
Byrd is no doubt holding out for funding for a bridge in his district. As they say in West Virginie, 'make hay while the sun shines'. Damned old senile fool. There ought to be an age limit for members of congress.
36 posted on 10/08/2002 7:47:15 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., a fierce opponent of the President Bush's Iraq war resolution, indicated he would use delaying tactics in an effort to block the measure. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said that could easily put off a final vote until next week.

Bird brain is carrying the water for the duplicitous dims. They want to delay the vote until after the November elections. Let's see how it goes.

37 posted on 10/08/2002 9:56:54 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Byrd can delay all he wants,he still will vote No
just like he did in 91. Some days,Byrd makes
Clinton look good....
38 posted on 10/08/2002 11:21:39 PM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cactusSharp
I agree, but, well NOBODY makes Clinton look good.
39 posted on 10/08/2002 11:40:11 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
it was sarcasm....lol...
40 posted on 10/09/2002 12:18:05 AM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson