Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another DC-area sniper-style shooting
Wife (FReeper nina0113) | October 4, 2002 | Steve0113

Posted on 10/04/2002 12:02:50 PM PDT by Steve0113

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 721-732 next last
To: ET(end tyranny)
My pleasure. And thanks for speaking up about the problem. That very well could have saved some lives.
501 posted on 10/04/2002 4:00:56 PM PDT by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Last report was that she'll be fine.
502 posted on 10/04/2002 4:01:31 PM PDT by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
I posted this on the other thread, but seeing as this one is more active, I repost:

Article says she was shot in the lower back - Sounds like a less skilled shooter.

The article also says that it was NOT a high powered weapon.

Question re "high powered" - The weapons that the police displayed at their press conference today as samples included an AR-15 and a long gun with scope. Are these both "high powered"?


503 posted on 10/04/2002 4:06:21 PM PDT by berkeleybeej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
wouldn't the gun likely have to be highpowered if the bullet passed through the women at a long range?
504 posted on 10/04/2002 4:06:53 PM PDT by newsperson999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane
I agree--I do not live in this direct area, but not so far off if this is progressing somehow over state lines(Ohio) and I frequent these types of stores, with my children no less. I'm in there and Joann's a couple times a week, maybe more if I have a craft swap or something going on.YIKES!
505 posted on 10/04/2002 4:11:00 PM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: berkeleybeej
The media considers anything over a .22 rimfire to be "high powered".
506 posted on 10/04/2002 4:16:26 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
That was the A1 series that was sent to the Gulf in '91. We've been at A2 for a few years now.

Three versions of the Abrams tank are currently in service the original M1 model, dating from the early 1980s, and two newer versions, designated M1A1 and M1A2. The M1A1 series, produced from 1985 through 1993, (from your link)

The M1A1/2 Abrams main battle tank is manufactured by General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS). The first M1 tank was produced in 1978, the M1A1 in 1985 and the M1A2 in 1986. 3,273 M1 tanks were produced for the US Army. 4,796 M1A1 tanks were built for the US Army, 221 for the US Marines and 555 co-produced with Egypt. 77 M1A2 tanks have been built for the US Army, 315 for Saudi Arabia and 218 for Kuwait. For the M1A2 Upgrade Program, 1079 M1 Abrams tanks are being upgraded to M1A2 configuration. (from my link)

I'm not so sure that some of the M1A1 didn't go to the Gulf. First of all, I was told by the line monitor that they were going to the ME. I worked at this place 1985-1987.

There are or were some bad ones that got through. I kept trying to get the line lead to do something about the problems. Nothing. I tried telling the foreman. Nothing. I even told one of the owners of the company. Nothing.

The problems ranged from people not using the proper braidind (weight and length), not using shill tape, connectors not being properly torqued, and too few being tested for water submersion, and those that were tested, always failed. The guy that did that job told me he never had one pass. Some idiots were even using scotch tape on the wires....

After the tank episode and being told I was a troublemaker and had a poor work attitude, I demanded to be put on another line. While on the new line I got to hear about other jobs that were 'failing'. One of the expeditors quit because she knew they were shipping bad stuff, and after fighting with the company over it, refused to ship them and quit.

Hopefully as you say, we are using the newest!

507 posted on 10/04/2002 4:21:14 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: berkeleybeej
Not compared to 7.82 NATO.
508 posted on 10/04/2002 4:24:43 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
What's the range on that handheld weapon?? They were talking about a silencer..

I shoot sillhouettes regularly. We use handguns out to 200 meters (or yards, depending on the firing range used), and while I am about a 10% shooter at that range (revolver, open sights or with scope, not much difference for me), others are downright deadly with their TC and XP100 race guns.

The black powder cartridge boys use those "quigly-down-under" style rifles, open sights, out to 500 meters, and even with a 20-30 foot drop in the bullet path, they tip them over easily. Some of the pistol shooters compete equally well at those ranges, usually with something like a 7mmTCU or something similar.

A silencer slows the expansion of the hot gasses so as to muffle the sound of the shot itself, but if the bullet is supersonic it will still crack with a sonic boom. In the case of the unfortunate (or somewhat fortunate, as the case may be) lady who survived, I don't see how they can say that it was not a rifle round, although it could have been slowed down to subsonic velocity (I doubt it though).

My experience with 10mm and 9mm pistol ammo is that after 100 yards, assuming you were still on target, you have lost too much velocity to do much good. Most of the common pistol stuff behaves similarly, until you get into the hot 357s, 44 mags, etc. Now, a 454 or 45 win mag, or some of the off-the-wall stuff like a 38 Casull might be effective, it would be an unlikely choice for a marksman. That is based on limited hunting and blowing-up-cinder-blocks and the like, so take it for what its worth.

My gut tells me that this was done using a 22-250 or 220 swift, not a 223 or 222, but if the LEOs were just speculating and had not recovered an intact bullet, it could have been something like a 6mm PPC or some other benchrester round known for accuracy. Heck, it could be an ugly old 243 from walmart. Point is, there are dozens of combos that could have been used, but it has absolutely nothing to do with the method or motivation, from a criminal profiling perspective.

509 posted on 10/04/2002 4:27:50 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999; berkeleybeej
High-powered is an increadibly relative term. The police and press would probably call any center-fire (as opposed to rimfire) rifle cartridge "high-powered". Here are the specs of the .223Rem that police are speculating was used:


Bullet Weight: 55grs.
Muzzle Velocity: 3240 fps
Muzzle Energy: 1282 ft-lbs

The data is from Haas' Guide to Small Arms Ammunition

510 posted on 10/04/2002 4:27:58 PM PDT by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
I should note that the numbers above are also a little subjective since muzzle velocity and energy change depending on the length of the barrel.
511 posted on 10/04/2002 4:28:47 PM PDT by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: glory
I agree--I do not live in this direct area, but not so far off if this is progressing somehow over state lines(Ohio) and I frequent these types of stores, with my children no less. I'm in there and Joann's a couple times a week, maybe more if I have a craft swap or something going on.YIKES!

Whole thing is spooky! I got an email yesterday from my sister. The email was one of those forwarded types warning you about something. Well, this one was warning people about certain stores. Target, Meijer and Wal-Mart. Said that ethnic men (whatever that means), were approaching people and asking them if they would smell some new perfume or some such. It warned that the perfume was really ether. Another warned of a man approaching a woman and asking if that were her vehicle. Said that she noticed a gun in the man's wasitband and she screamed and people ran to her aid, and that the police were called.

Well, the police that were called were from my city, so, I called the police and asked if this incident really occured. I was told "NO, that it was totally bogus".

The thing about the email that caught my eye though was that the store where the police were called is located about 20 yds from the freeway.

512 posted on 10/04/2002 4:30:19 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Deguello; ET(end tyranny); xm177e2
The M1-A1 is a tank.
The M1A is Springfield Armory's copy of the M14 7.62 X 51/.308.
The M1 Garand battle rifle of WWII fame fired the 30-06.
The M1 Carbine, again of WWII, fired .30 Carbine.
513 posted on 10/04/2002 4:37:24 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
About the NFA requirements, if I read that correctly, an original folding stock is legal? Not that I could afford one, but I was curious. I am saving the $$$ for an M1 carbine rechambered for 45 win mag, I don't know why. It is just so cute! And it shoots a man's cartridge! I think I'll powdercoat it hot pink and paint the stock in a yellow, blue and arange camo, LOL!
514 posted on 10/04/2002 4:38:27 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
Make that 7.62.
515 posted on 10/04/2002 4:38:37 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
If they start making normal people targets...
WHAT on EARTH does "normal people" mean??

516 posted on 10/04/2002 4:39:20 PM PDT by GirlShortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: ZinGirl
had to be out for awhile so you've prolly had lots of agreement by now,
but that thought crossed my mind as well, given the michael's connection...
517 posted on 10/04/2002 4:40:42 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
"High-powered" is about as overused as "assault rifle", IMO. I shoot a big hogleg revolver, someone aptly described it as an Earschplittenloudenboomer. It pales in comparison to your average deer rifle. I share your thoughts though.
518 posted on 10/04/2002 4:41:41 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
What does M1 stand for? Just curious after seeing your list.
519 posted on 10/04/2002 4:42:23 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: berkeleybeej
Technically, anything with a rimless cartridge, or a bottle necked cartridge, or not loaded with authentic black powder is "high powered". That means practically everything is "high powered" save for the old 22 rimfire and some old fashioned lever action carbines that shoot pistol ammo.
520 posted on 10/04/2002 4:47:42 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 721-732 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson