Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So why don't the Republicans ask Rudy Guiliani to move to New Jersey and put HIS name on the ballot?

Posted on 10/02/2002 6:02:33 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Let's leave the winks, nods, cheating, and scum to the democrats. We don't need to wallow in their filth.
41 posted on 10/03/2002 6:14:35 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Let's leave the winks, nods, cheating, and scum to the democrats.

How is it cheating if a court already ruled it is perfectly one hundred percent LEGAL?

42 posted on 10/03/2002 6:25:07 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
It's legal by the standards of corrupt democrat judges. Is that your standard?

I'm surprised these "judges" didn't rule the democrat (whoever that is) the winner. Why bother with one more election to negate? Maybe they fear being too brazen. But mark my word, the difference between what they've done and negating the people's right to vote is smaller than you think. The line wasn't crossed because they might not get away with it, not because they're not capable of doing it. Totalitarian elite's are the same everywhere. They're above the mere law the rest of us must abide by. Watch them, fear them, fight them. And please, don't buy into their wink and nod politics. We need to fight their filth, not become part of it.

"You don't understand. We WOULDN'T be criminals. It's now perfectly LEGAL."

43 posted on 10/03/2002 7:22:22 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
It's legal by the standards of corrupt democrat judges. Is that your standard?

I'm surprised these "judges" didn't rule the democrat (whoever that is) the winner. Why bother with one more election to negate? Maybe they fear being too brazen. But mark my word, the difference between what they've done and negating the people's right to vote is smaller than you think. The line wasn't crossed because they might not get away with it, not because they're not capable of doing it. Totalitarian elite's are the same everywhere. They're above the mere law the rest of us must abide by. Watch them, fear them, fight them. And please, don't buy into their wink and nod politics. We need to fight their filth, not become part of it.

"You don't understand. We WOULDN'T be criminals. It's now perfectly LEGAL."

44 posted on 10/03/2002 7:23:22 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

 

CLICK ON IMAGE FOR T-SHIRTS!

45 posted on 10/03/2002 7:26:10 AM PDT by CPL BAUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
So why don't the Republicans ask Rudy Guiliani to move to New Jersey and put HIS name on the ballot?

I think rudy has some other senator in his sights


46 posted on 10/03/2002 7:26:49 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
It's legal by the standards of corrupt democrat judges. Is that your standard?

Let's assume I am a major league baseball coach who hates the wildly controversial "designated hitter rule."

But I decide to abide by it and use it to my team's advantage.

That doesn't mean I am cheating, does it?

Of course not.

How is this different?

47 posted on 10/03/2002 7:46:10 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
But he never got the Presidency running from a Senate seat.

In so far as I can find, only JFK and Warren G. Harding have made the leap from the Senate to the Presidency, although many have been Senators previously like Harry S Truman. However, it may not be a good thing to make this leap since both Presidents died in office in their 1st term. Bad precedent! Let the Dems beware!

48 posted on 10/04/2002 7:11:18 PM PDT by SES1066
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Why would he have to move? Lautenberg lives in Martha's Vinyard.
49 posted on 10/04/2002 7:17:25 PM PDT by myrabach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
And the main reason. Which is undertandable if you're not from NYC; he'd rather be caught in a dress with a little boy in his bed that demean himself by running for office in NewJersey! New Jersey!
50 posted on 10/06/2002 3:07:58 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj; Utah Girl; All
It seems I'm not the only one:

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-alt100902.asp
51 posted on 10/09/2002 7:37:45 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson