Posted on 09/22/2002 11:34:27 AM PDT by Tancredo Fan
I was surprised to hear that lib Chretien ranting away when Canada's liberal asylum and immigration policies are among the worst in the world. As for Mexico, that isn't a surprise. What is a surprise is the lack of comment out of DC on those contemptible, meddlesome, obnoxious varmints. They are still mad as hell that we kicked their butts back in 1848. Alas, this nation has a real bad habit of starting things and not finishing them. This always makes things worse for us in the future (if you get my drift). Mexico is not now nor has it ever been a friendly nation. It should have been dealt with once and for all in 1848.
All of the bills they generate, their gangsters, their language, and their non-stop arrogance.
Thanks for the link. It made for a very interesting read. Also thanks for your comments in your post #21.
"The government's principal reason for promoting high immigration levels in spite of the costs seems to be the belief that most newcomers will vote for the Liberal party in federal elections," writes Mr. Collacott.
"This is particularly true of family-class immigration, which is the least successful category in terms of economic performance and should be significantly curtailed."
Gee, that sounds familiar...
Do a search. Several of the 9-11 terrorists entered through Canada, none through Mexico.
Yes Mexico's border is problematic, but Canada's is not watched as closely it seems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.