Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary: Monica Missiles Not 'Wag the Dog'
Newsmax.com ^ | September 15, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 09/15/2002 4:14:53 PM PDT by Paul Atreides

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Alissa
but this time Hillary is going to be skewered. The American Public is not as stupid regarding the Clintons this time around.

Well, we can always ... hope.

However, that doesn't diminish the vote fraud the clintons have managed, to ensure each victory since blubba got defeated for guv.

41 posted on 09/15/2002 4:54:17 PM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"The missiles had a window to be launched. We were able to take out apparently, according to reports, some of the training camp people, but not him."

Notice the "WE were able to take out..." phrasing in an attempt to imply she was instrumental in planning a military strike.

(Don't ask me why she wants to hitch her wagon to that pathetic strike except to paint herself in the minds of some as someone experienced in such matters. You know, as someone with presidential experience.)

gag

42 posted on 09/15/2002 4:54:20 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Hillary has been unhappy that Billary was on the receiving end of the Monica "blows" instead of herself (Hillary)-then, of course her other "bow", Janet, only knows how to blow elections (did Janet ever do Billary?).
43 posted on 09/15/2002 4:57:57 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Very Good! Sometimes a cigar is...
just a cigar...
44 posted on 09/15/2002 4:58:28 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"Towards the end, doesn't it sound like she is leveling some vague threats? It does to me."

She's threatening, no question about it. But threatening who, and with what, isn't clear.

I believe that's just her "style". When she gets a question she doesn't like, she goes into a defensive shell and utters vague threats.

Think playground: she's of the "I'm gonna get you!" school. Lotta hate in that woman. They're both psychopaths...

45 posted on 09/15/2002 4:58:32 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The "training camp people". Guffaw!
46 posted on 09/15/2002 4:58:45 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
You know, if the American voter was so smart, as she says, she would have never been elected, you know.
47 posted on 09/15/2002 5:00:57 PM PDT by RedwM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
She couldn't tell the truth even if she was guaranteed to be given normal looking legs..........
48 posted on 09/15/2002 5:01:06 PM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Someone really needs to speak to her about the pantsuit and the "you know" every other word.

And the nasal drone. I can't stand to listen to her.

49 posted on 09/15/2002 5:03:19 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"There was intelligence about where he was going to be at a certain time," Sen. Clinton insisted. "The missiles had a window to be launched. We were able to take out apparently, according to reports, some of the training camp people, but not him."

Y'know, she's giving us two choices here. And only two choices. Either a.) she knows exactly how it happened because she was there or b.) she's taking Bill's word for it.

And, if pressed, I don't think she'd want to admit to either...

Oh, to be asking the questions:

Q. But how do you know that for sure, Senator Clinton? Were you there with your husband? Or are you taking his word for it?

50 posted on 09/15/2002 5:05:23 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Notice the "WE were able to take out..." phrasing in an attempt to imply she was instrumental in planning a military strike.

Oh, but she was. Don't you remember the stories about how angry she was with Bill when he was going to give his deposition that she called him up and told him to send bombers?

51 posted on 09/15/2002 5:05:42 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"You know, I don't know of any president
- and I think I can say this without regard to party
or any other consideration
- who would knowingly do something for political reasons that is that serious,"


52 posted on 09/15/2002 5:05:50 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
The "training camp people".

Well that's the technical term...

53 posted on 09/15/2002 5:06:52 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Sam - You don't have to hold back here. Next time tell us what you really think. This is a good start though.

Bama
54 posted on 09/15/2002 5:07:06 PM PDT by BamaBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
It is so sickening the way she ingratiates herself into every exploitable situation.
55 posted on 09/15/2002 5:07:48 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Don't hold back, Sam, tell us how you really feel. Outstanding rant!
56 posted on 09/15/2002 5:08:18 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The way "is" and "alone" are technical terms?
57 posted on 09/15/2002 5:08:35 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Don't you remember the stories about how angry she was with Bill when he was going to give his deposition that she called him up and told him to send bombers?

You're right! That's even scarier.

So much to keep track of.

58 posted on 09/15/2002 5:09:31 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Darn Hillary this is not about your husband anymore. We all know he blew it, or got blown. Which ever works.
59 posted on 09/15/2002 5:09:36 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swheats
I wish they would just take their money and GO AWAY!
60 posted on 09/15/2002 5:11:14 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson