Maryland's imploding Democrats

The Washington Times ^ | 9/8/2002 | House Editorial

[cinFLA]

Maybe we see this next in California!

Although Davis leads Simon in the polls, Davis has an unfavorable rating greater than 50% while Simon (in spite of the non-stop smear by Davis and the recent decision against the Simon partners) has an unfavorable rating UNDER 50%.

[maica]

Good idea! Remind everyone that KKT is 50% Skakel. After all the newsmedia gave the convicted killer in Greenwich a new name "Kennedy cousin Michael Skakel", which we heard day after day in every account of his trial.
As the oldest of Rogert and Ethel's kids her name might actually be Kathleen Skakel Kennedy Townsend.
Wouldn't that be a hoot, if true!

[an amused spectator]

See my post #40. There wouldn't be any vote fraud exposed, but Freepers who participated in anything like this would most certainly be jailed on phony felony "voter intimidation" charges.

I'm thinking a two-pronged assault. 1. vote fraud is a direct assault on your rights as a citizen - the kind of assault that might conceivably require revolutionary action. 2. Why are ATMs videotaped, and voting booths are not? Determined parties can steal billions of dollars through vote fraud. What can you get from an ATM? Several hundred dollars?

[nunya bidness]

I'll be there bright and early Tuesday morning monkeywrenching the primary like always.

It's more fun than the general election.

And a sure way to see that your vote actually counts.

[infowarrior]

Would that make the Hildabeast his horse?

the infowarrior

[jackbill]

As the oldest of Rogert and Ethel's kids her name might actually be Kathleen Skakel Kennedy Townsend.

Wouldn't that be a hoot, if true!

Yes it would, unfortunately her maiden name is Kathleen Hartington Kennedy. She was given that name at her christening, with her Godfather, Senator Joseph McCarthy, in attendance.

[maica]

Yes, that fact does not figure too prominently in her campaign literature!

[Francohio]

This is a felony: "voter intimidation", defined as the action of "any person who willfully and deliberately utilizes any tactic, commits any act, engages in any conduct or conspires with another to interfere with the free, unimpeded and unfettered exercise of a person's constitutional right to vote..."

Heavens forfend! I would not wish to interfere with any Mexican's apparent constitutional right to vote in an American election. Neither would I deny that anyone who numbers a slave among their ancestors should make up for that ancestors' lack of rights with as many votes as possible in each and every precinct of any city, state or region. In the spirit of political correctness, I withdraw my callous suggestion to monitor these wholesome activities.