Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Showdown on concealed weapons: Ohio Supreme Court to decide if citizens can carry
Cincinnati Enquirer ^ | 06 September 2002 | Dan Horn

Posted on 09/06/2002 12:11:05 PM PDT by Deadeye Division

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: schmelvin
BUMP Post #40 !!!

You write well. Truth can do that.

It did for me !
41 posted on 09/07/2002 4:34:51 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: schmelvin
"Hybrid Vigor."
42 posted on 09/07/2002 4:38:23 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
That map isn't quite right.

New Mexico passed a shall-issue law, but the law was overturned by the state supreme court, because it allowed local cities to opt-out.

So right now, New Mexico is still a no-issue state. (Though it's an open-carry state, and the penalty for carrying concealed is minor).
43 posted on 09/08/2002 11:53:51 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
Good luck, guys & gals!


44 posted on 09/08/2002 11:57:26 AM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
Lima News Editorial

Let Ohioans live safely

SEPT. 16, 2002 -- There's an old saying that whatever doesn't kill us makes us stronger, meaning that our experiences often prepare us for whatever is yet to come. We learn from mistakes by taking steps to ensure we don't repeat them, which accounts for the additional airport security and heightened sense of awareness we've all experienced in the wake of the terrorist attacks of last September.

Hardly a week has gone by since then that we haven't been reminded by this politician or that talking head that we, as individuals, must take more responsibility for thwarting future attacks by alerting authorities to anything or anyone out of the ordinary. In essence, individuals are being asked to look after themselves, rather than relying on the authorities to solve all of our problems.

A good example is a drama unfolding in and around Baton Rouge, La, where a serial killer is responsible for the deaths of three women in the past 10 months. Police apparently have few leads in the cases, but have evidence tying all three murders to the same person. As might be imagined, women in the area are concerned for their safety. But they're not just sitting around fretting about it. Many are taking self-defense classes. Some have opted to carry pepper spray and travel only in pairs.

During a recent radio interview, Louisiana Gov. Mike Foster reminded women that they also have the right to arm themselves against the danger. "Most people don't ever want to use a gun to protect themselves - that's the last thing they want to do," Foster told listeners, "but if you know how ... it sure can save you a lot of grief."

Unfortunately, Ohio's governor can't issue the same advice because it is against the law in this state to carry a concealed weapon.

Studies show that crime rates have gone down in states after they allowed law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons. The prediction that more armed citizens would signal a return to the days of gunfights in city streets have not come to pass, nor are they likely to. Most gun owners understand and appreciate the huge responsibility that goes along with carrying a firearm, and act accordingly. There have been few cases in which U.S. permit holders have been involved in an incident in which his or her firearm was misused.

In addition, there have been cases in which would-be crime victims, by merely showing the criminal a gun, have sent criminals away empty-handed. And there's no way to guess how many crimes are not even contemplated due to the risk of finding an armed victim.

It is long past time for the Ohio General Assembly to stop skirting the issue. The people of Ohio need the ability to legally carry a concealed weapon. Nearly every state in the union has laws allowing its residents to carry a concealed weapon. Why shouldn't Ohioans also enjoy this extra measure of safety during these troubled times?

We don't support vigilantism and aren't suggesting everyone go out and buy a handgun to carry around with them. Not everyone wants one and some people shouldn't have one. But government shouldn't stand in the way of those law-abiding citizens who are willing to take more responsibility for their own security by getting a gun.

45 posted on 09/16/2002 5:05:05 PM PDT by Deadeye Division
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
Good luck Ohio!


46 posted on 09/16/2002 6:21:27 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson