Skip to comments.
Booby-Trapped Pot Injures Three Drug Agents
wkrn ^
Posted on 08/31/2002 3:15:57 AM PDT by chance33_98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640, 641-645 next last
To: Hemingway's Ghost
If adjectives were arguments, you might might stand a chance.
601
posted on
09/05/2002 2:30:21 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: tpaine
All grants of power to Congress in Sec. 8, as elsewhere, must be read in conjunction with the final clause, cl. 18, of Sec. 8, which authorizes Congress '' [t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing powers.''
602
posted on
09/05/2002 2:32:15 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
All grants of power to Congress in Sec. 8, as elsewhere, must be read in conjunction with the final clause, cl. 18, of Sec. 8, which authorizes Congress '' [t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing powers.''
602
__________________________________
Congrats roscoe, you actually made a point on constitutonal principle.
-- Now, -- do you agree that the 10th amendment severely restricts the congressional application of cl. 18, Sec. 8?
603
posted on
09/05/2002 2:45:59 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: Roscoe
We're not a communist country. What a disingenuous, vacuous response. You didn't address my question. Either you're an idiot, or you're evading the question.
To: WyldKard
Why would you think that of Roscoe? I mean he's such a big gooberment freak anyway, why on earth would you think he'd flinch from seeing firearms banned if it would further his war on Americans called the war on some drugs?
605
posted on
09/05/2002 6:41:18 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: Roscoe
Ever hear of Marbury v Madison? A piece of legislation repugnant to the Constitution, which, by the way is a set of limitations on GOOBERMENT, NOT we the People, is void from the day it was enacted, not merely the day it is found so, and is not to be enforced or any similar thing. So it's up to you to prove the CONSTITUTIONALITY of the thing rather than the opposite. Just because your FedGov goons usurp a power not theirs to have does NOT make it Constitutional and it matters not HOW many Congressional "findings" you have. You can have 2,302,239,295 and they mean zip. I suggest you READ THE CONSTITUTION before you open your mouth. It limits YOU, the GOOBERMENT GOONSQUADS, NOT we the people.
606
posted on
09/05/2002 6:50:01 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: dcwusmc
A piece of legislation repugnant to the Constitution Prohibitions on dope aren't.
607
posted on
09/05/2002 6:58:48 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Backward, indeed. The Supremes "found" a "right" to commit murder and call it abortion the same way FedGov "found" some "authority" to prohibit drugs, in the name of racism and control over various groups of people. No one need PROVE a right to self-medicate. FedGov must prove that it has the legitimate authority to BAN something, which it has not been able to do, despite your maudlin drools all over the thread.
608
posted on
09/05/2002 7:08:29 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: dcwusmc
The Supremes "found" a "right" to commit murder and call it abortion the same way FedGov "found" some "authority" to prohibit drugs Backwards. The CSA is carefully grounded in, among other things, the Constitutional powers of Congress to regulate trade among the states and with foreign countries.
By contrast, dopers and abortionists want the courts to invent "Constitutional rights" for them.
609
posted on
09/05/2002 7:14:41 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
All grants of power to Congress in Sec. 8, as elsewhere, must be read in conjunction with the final clause, cl. 18, of Sec. 8, which authorizes Congress '' [t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing powers.''
602
__________________________________
Congrats roscoe, you actually made a point on constitutonal principle.
-- Now, -- do you agree that the 10th amendment severely restricts the congressional application of cl. 18, Sec. 8?
603
_________________________________
Your failure/inablity to answer the above is noted. Thanks.
610
posted on
09/05/2002 7:24:46 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: Roscoe
Roscoe, I am really glad you post your drool here. I know of several EX-Woddies who have read your barbra streisand over time and came to the rational conclusion that if you are FOR it, a believer in liberty and the Constitution MUST be AGAINST it. You are really making the case AGAINST the war on Americans called a war on some drugs. Thanks from the bottom of my heart. You do far more good than you know... or intend, if you are not secretly on the side of truth, justice and the American way.
611
posted on
09/05/2002 7:37:06 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: chance33_98
I once had a teacher who was a retired police captain. He told the class about his officers finding a shack in the woods that they were certain was a meth lab. Because it was likely to be booby trapped he felt it was too dangerous to send his men in. So, he called the fire department instead.
To: Roscoe
If adjectives were arguments, you might might stand a chance.
How many dodges is this now? Wake me up when you've figured out how to make your case like a conservative and not like a socialist. It's really easy, by the way---I could make the case for you. I've already given you a hint, but you keep on arguing down dead-end streets.
To: Hemingway's Ghost
Drug legalization is not a "conservative" issue
To: dcwusmc
What are you babbling on about?
Never mind. If it isn't intelligible, it likely isn't important.
To: dcwusmc
Thanks from the bottom of my heart. Bottom of your bong, maybe.
To: Hemingway's Ghost
Wake me up . . .I vote we just let you sleep.
Comment #618 Removed by Moderator
To: Roscoe
"The CSA is carefully grounded in, among other things, the Constitutional powers of Congress to regulate trade among the states and with foreign countries." You think the potential of interstate sale is enough to regulate a product?
To: dcwusmc
war on Americans Backwards. That's what the drug dealers were doing with their booby traps.
620
posted on
09/06/2002 12:35:59 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640, 641-645 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson