Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. general tells Israelis war will start by late November
WORLD TRIBUNE.COM ^ | Thursday, August 29, 2002 | SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM

Posted on 08/29/2002 7:40:19 AM PDT by TheConservator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: GraniteStateConservative
War with Irag will make appropriations issues moot. Which Senator is going to vote against them?
41 posted on 08/29/2002 8:59:09 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Grut
"Iraq preemptively invades Jordan in September to "

I seriously doubt that Iraq could get an invasion force halfway to their own boarder without them being decimated from the air, just from what's in theater now.

42 posted on 08/29/2002 9:00:05 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Grut
Your scenario is as likely as mine.
(I don't expect anyone to take mine seriously.)


43 posted on 08/29/2002 9:01:14 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
If a reporter relies upon anonymous sources to get a story written than it should be required that the reporter get a statement why or to what purpose the no-name source would leak this information.
I am sick of these no source/anonymous news articles. The reporters ethics should require an anonymous source to give a statement on the purpose for their leak.
We could at least put the news into context then, without it we know nothing or have to draw our own conclusions as to the background of the news reported.

/rant off...I hope this is coherent

44 posted on 08/29/2002 9:06:12 AM PDT by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
I'd still do it this Saturday when travellers are off the road and office buildings are empty for the holiday weekend until Tuesday, but that's just me. I'm still guessing the 7th.
45 posted on 08/29/2002 9:09:39 AM PDT by TheLurkerX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: michigander
another fan of global I see.
46 posted on 08/29/2002 9:10:39 AM PDT by Fyscat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheLurkerX
I agree with your reasoning.
47 posted on 08/29/2002 9:19:35 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
we should have started seeing some major activity by now in the way of deployments

Maybe no one has noticed the huge subterranean US Army bases just outside Baghdad, Pyongyang, and Tehran. There is a Strangelove mineshaft gap.

48 posted on 08/29/2002 9:22:58 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: TheConservator
"... an unnamed general who heads Army logistics..."

Duh... shouldn't be too difficult to figure out if you have the Army's org chart...

50 posted on 08/29/2002 9:33:50 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
Isn't it time for you to get your ass back inside the mosque.
51 posted on 08/29/2002 9:35:16 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
There is no way the liunatic Bush woill be allowed to attack Iraq, despite what his dad and Uncle ariel say. It is amazing to watch the dumbed down masses in the US actually support it. You are fed propaganda on a simple level and you are soaking it up. The rest of the world is looking on in dumfounded amazment. If you do attack--it will be your 'Suez'--have no doubts about that. Nobody and I mean nobody will support you, period!

Nice try, Ahmed. Time to go. Your camel is double-parked in a No Loading Zone.

52 posted on 08/29/2002 9:35:28 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The idea that the war can't happen because Bush is scheduled to address the United Nations, or to make a political speech in New Hampshire, is one of the silliest I have seen in awhile.

Obviously if the War goes on, all those speaking engagements go OFF!

Every day after 9-2/3 is less likely, true, 9-6/7 is Rosh Hashanah, but to my mind the New Moon of October on 10-5/6 is the last possible date. If we have not gone ahead by then, we ain't goin.

Poster above who refers to the planned Saddam attack on Iraq is right...surely we are not just going to sit back and let him go ahead with that.

53 posted on 08/29/2002 9:36:08 AM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: freedomson
I went to a Sounds series in Nashville back in '97...Sounds swept the visiting triple A Indianapolis Indians...
54 posted on 08/29/2002 9:37:08 AM PDT by nicko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
In 1990 it took 6 months between the time the first soldier hit the ground until we were ready to strike Iraq. We're supposed to duplicate that in 12 weeks?
55 posted on 08/29/2002 9:42:35 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
We don't need the support of others. We will do what must be done regardless of what others, particularly Eurotrash who would like to see NYC nuked, think.
56 posted on 08/29/2002 9:43:11 AM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Do any of you have a dinner menu ready for this event?
57 posted on 08/29/2002 9:44:55 AM PDT by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
You know, when they don't name the people who supposedly said all this, I don't know how they can even call it legitimate news.

Carolyn

58 posted on 08/29/2002 9:56:08 AM PDT by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
Nobody and I mean nobody will support you

China will. This time the Crusaders and the Khan will meet in Damascus and close the book on old business.

59 posted on 08/29/2002 9:57:41 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"In 1990 it took 6 months between the time the first soldier hit the ground until we were ready to strike Iraq. We're supposed to duplicate that in 12 weeks?"

In part I agree, but on the other hand the equivalent of "hitting the ground" began months ago with forward deployment of supplies, equipment and a few thousand people. I think the next step may look a lot like what I think you're imagining, taking a large airfield, or rolling across a border or coast to build invasion support facilities inside Iraq. Or it may be part that, and/or something more imaginative that will appear to some to come out of nowhere, with much less warning than 6 months or 12 weeks.

60 posted on 08/29/2002 10:04:36 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson