Skip to comments.
Neo-Conservatives are not Conservatives
Sierra Times ^
| August 12, 2002
| Jeff Adams
Posted on 08/12/2002 5:48:59 AM PDT by sauropod
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: sauropod
They've ruined that word. I am a Traditionalist. A Traditionalist fraud, perhaps. We don't allow moral-liberals to define conservatism for us.
To: steve50
you don't hear the neocon label on the idiot box much anymore.I plan on doing my part in reviving the label and making it stick to these anti-liberty, anti-South bigots.
To: general_re
I think so much is hot air from them.They aren't constructive, postive people, so they TALK a good game.Ever seen a pessimist actually accomplish anything? It's easier to proclaim "failure" before you start than actually be proven to be one ;-)
To: Cultural Jihad
moral-liberalsWhat is a moral-libral?
To: billbears
44 posts and the usual neo-cons/leftists have not shown up. Is there a communist cell meeting this morning?
To: habs4ever
The ideological purists always complain that the pragmatic realists are selling out. Live with me in New York for a while - or Ontario, for that matter - and you soon come to appreciate the virtues of "better than nothing".... ;)
To: CWRWinger
"Ah, gee. Let people do whatsoever they want to. It's all nobody's business what consenting adults do. It's all relative. We can't be judgmental about anything. Let's all just live and let die. People have no intrinsic and inestimable worth and value. People can all go to hell in a handbasket for all I care. I am most compassionate!"
To: CWRWinger
LOL, well not the usual however I think it'd be safe to say I've been attacked more than once for 'gasp' wanting to be truly conservative. I think the author of the article has it dead on. Republicans of today have become some sort of big government nice guys. As long as 'our' side is in power, devil be d#mned if you speak out against them. What I find truly ironic is that if a Democrat were doing the exact same things, the outrage from any Republican would be heard for miles.
To: habs4ever
If you keep the party going, how come there aren't more of you? Where is that State legislature composed of "true" conservatives that will galvanize so many of you to take it national? Your whole post was an endorsement of staying on the fringe, yet you can't see the irony in it.Another classic sign of a fringe dweller;plus the inevitable "not a dime's worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats" mantra which is trotted out ad nauseum to fortify your delusions.Yeah, that's not fringe thinking, is it? Careful, every political movement worth noting throughout history was instigated by an element that can be described as "fringe".
49
posted on
08/12/2002 8:01:54 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: rdb3
I'm a free-thinker who views issues through the lenses of free (fair) trade, deregulation, tremendously less taxation, overwhelmingly strong defense, and liberty. How to attain these are up for debate to me, but apparently not for others. To them, it's their way or the highway. Very nicely put
50
posted on
08/12/2002 8:02:11 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: sauropod
The Neo-Traditionalists have gotten more vocal of late and I seem to miss anything constructive, positive, or realistic in the rhetoric, so far. But I'm listening.
51
posted on
08/12/2002 8:09:40 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: habs4ever
plus the inevitable "not a dime's worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats" mantra which is trotted out ad nauseum to fortify your delusions.If you can honestly point to me a difference that I can stand on, believe in, just within the campaign here in NC between Elizabeth Dole and Erskine Bowles, I would consider your argument. However they are both the same shade. Both talking about national healthcare, both for tariffs, both at some level pro-choice, both anti-gun, and both big government. Yet the true conservatives are called 'fringe' because they believe in the Constitution and hold mainly conservative views. They also won't be able to pick up the vote after the RNC (which made the choice sometime back in Feb. and we haven't even had our primaries yet!!) has dumped every bit of money behind Giddy because of her name recognition.
This is just one example but it is becoming more prevalent in the political world
To: general_re
I lived under a "true" socialist government from 1991 to 1995.The real, Euro kind of traditional socialist apparatus, and it was a misery,so i know a little thing about what a socialist is and isn't.When the Paleo goes off tarring those to the left of them as socialists,but well to the right of Ralph Nader, well, I say gimme some of that socialism!!
To: Cultural Jihad
"Ah, gee. Let people do whatsoever they want to. It's all nobody's business what consenting adults do. It's all relative. We can't be judgmental about anything. Let's all just live and let die. People have no intrinsic and inestimable worth and value. People can all go to hell in a handbasket for all I care. I am most compassionate!" The morality of socialism: The individual is too valuable to be trusted to look after himself.
To: skeeter
Yup, that movement began under National Review, on through to Goldwater, and culminated in Reagan.So, are the paleos saying their day is but upon us all?
To: sauropod
Maybe it's Neo, as in New, as in New World Order, as in One World, as in creating the UN and spearheading UN opposition, as in playing both ends against the middle.
To: Jimer
Than again, it could be Neo as in a New tank of gas for a New car.
To: Jimer
My last post was intended to reply to post #1.
To: 4ConservativeJustices
I would rather "throw my vote away" on an independent or third-party candidate and sleep well at night because I didn't contribute to the continuing downfall of our lost republic by voting for a neo-conservative/socialist, than choose "the lesser of two evils" and know that I voted into office someone who was going to go for my wallet and stab me in the back as if he were a common street mugger.Well see I say that and get attacked for apparently having principles. From the responses I've seen of late, it just strengthens my belief that the only way to return to what the Founders had in mind would be to abolish the 17th Amendment. The voters have seen they can vote themselves money, among other things, from the public treasury and the general government. At this rate I truly feel we are at Tyler's 'apathy to dependency' point with only bondage left to go
To: CWRWinger
I plan on doing my part in reviving the label and making it stick to these anti-liberty, anti-South bigots.Did you actually type "South" and "bigot" in the same sentence with a straight face?
60
posted on
08/12/2002 8:20:36 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson