Skip to comments.
Skulls Found in Africa and in Europe Challenge Theories of Human Origins
NY Times ^
| August 6, 2002
| By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
Posted on 08/11/2002 3:59:04 PM PDT by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 461-467 next last
To: Jorge
Have you visted other crevo threads? Any hostility you may see in this thread is minor compared to the abuse hurled at evolutionists.
21
posted on
08/11/2002 6:39:55 PM PDT
by
Aracelis
To: vannrox
So much for the nice neat theories supporting the "From goo to you by way of the zoo" school of thought.
To: housetops
the evidence-disadvantaged field of human evolutionAt least the article got one fact right!
23
posted on
08/11/2002 6:42:41 PM PDT
by
coramdeo
To: Ahban
Since I am creationist/a modern computer user/ who teaches science I don't fit into your worldview now do I? No. I guess I should have mentioned that there are exceptions.
To: Piltdown_Woman
Have you visted other crevo threads? Any hostility you may see in this thread is minor compared to the abuse hurled at evolutionists. So I have to go to other threads to see creationists displaying the sort of abuse evolutionists are posting here...
ok.
BTW, I've visted many "crevo threads" in this and other online forums....and I've never seen anything to compare to the personal insults and invective some evolutionists resort to in order to avoid defending their convoluted bag-o-wind theories.
25
posted on
08/11/2002 6:50:20 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: general_re
Wow! what are these other ways. Don't leave us in suspense. Or else we'll think you're spoofing.
General statements as rebuttal don't wash. Gotta have numbers from the scientists. The circular reasoning in question at least had terms I could identify with. Just give a few external indicators and the name of that radioisotope they help calibrate for accuracy...
To: Scully
You won't find discussion and disagreement like this between Creationists. I don't know. There must be some reason for the 250 Christian Churches in the US alone. It's also interesting how few of us know which Bible we're reading.
To: gusopol3
By using the pronoun "we" I must assume that you have a mouse in your pocket.
To: vannrox
There is nothing surprising in this, it is expected, the evolutionary tree, just by the way it came about will look like a bush or a tree, then a straight up ladder, some breakoffs will not work and therefore die off, dead end, while others will work and will continue to evolve, and some of those won't work and that branch will die, another dead end.
To say that this rolls evolution on its head is ridiculous, it just shows that it is indeed giving the right answers, and continues to grow. The basic theory is VERY sound, and it will just get more and more pieces added to it.
Again, to say that this hurts the theory of evolution at all, is going way beyond any kind of evidence.
Keep trying though, I love to see you Creo's freaking out and latching onto whatever you can find.
29
posted on
08/11/2002 7:00:06 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: Aric2000
Again, to say that this hurts the theory of evolution at all, is going way beyond any kind of evidence. But it doesn't do very much for the "theory" of Noah's Ark, does it?
To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the ping, this should be a fun thread!! LOL
31
posted on
08/11/2002 7:03:28 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: vannrox
This really exposes how little we know of human evolution Bingo
32
posted on
08/11/2002 7:08:15 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: PatrickHenry
Nope, it sure doesn't, but again, this will be a fun thread. The Creo's are gonna take it as a chink, when in fact it is fully expected.
33
posted on
08/11/2002 7:08:57 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: gore3000
ping
34
posted on
08/11/2002 7:09:06 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Tribune7
Did you have to do that?
To: Tribune7
Did you really have to do that?
This thread will now be ruined, there will Blue everywhere, talking about stuff that is totally ridiculous and been gone over time and time again. And been refuted and shot dowm time and time again.
Oh well, was gonna be a fun thread, but then again, he would have found it on his own, but better later then sooner as far as I am concerned.
36
posted on
08/11/2002 7:11:54 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: vannrox
Careful reading of Genesis 1-2 challenges current theories of human origin!
37
posted on
08/11/2002 7:12:01 PM PDT
by
Chemnitz
To: PatrickHenry
Great minds man, great minds!! LOL
38
posted on
08/11/2002 7:12:25 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: PatrickHenry
Creationism is a loose association of the dropouts of modern society, who have little in common other than zero understanding of, and hostility toward, science.Spoken like a true kool-aid drinker believer.
I asked you a question a while ago in a simlar thread. You never answered.
Care to try again?
39
posted on
08/11/2002 7:16:19 PM PDT
by
JZoback
To: Aric2000; PatrickHenry
:-)
40
posted on
08/11/2002 7:16:45 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 461-467 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson