Skip to comments.
WND banned from covering Capitol (Paul Sperry)
WorldNet Daily ^
| 8/7/02
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 08/06/2002 11:32:43 PM PDT by glorygirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
To: Hed
No, they reported that there was a plan to invade. That's false. Read the link in Post #50.
Here's one laughable snippet, but there are many more.
Equally troubling, at the beginning of the week, the Iraqi force already in Jordan was sighted moving west, several groups having reached the sand dunes and wadis known as Abu Haffrah, about 80 km (50 miles) inside Jordanian territory.King Abdullah decided to take command of the Jordanian forces still chasing the Iraqis intruders. That is why he looked so worried and tired as though he had not slept for nights in his public appearances in Amman in the past week. He also appeared in combat fatigues.
It's bad enough that WND prints this crap, but it's unbelievable to me that anyone here would defend it, or, in your case, have a case of total denial.
61
posted on
08/07/2002 7:46:24 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Reborn
Welcome Hed!! I agree with your thoughts 100%! I enjoy reading stuff at WND, and I hope that they sue this stupid board.Let me make absolutely sure I've got this straight. You think WND should sue FreeRepublic?
62
posted on
08/07/2002 7:49:37 AM PDT
by
dighton
To: glorygirl
You have to be a puppet on a string to cover the Whitehouse anymore.We have taken Russia's place in the world of Communism and trying hard to take Chinas place in human rights violations.
63
posted on
08/07/2002 7:53:05 AM PDT
by
gunnedah
To: dighton
LOL I didn't know that FR has a board, lol. I'm referring to the main article.
64
posted on
08/07/2002 7:55:03 AM PDT
by
Reborn
To: gPal
Washington,WE HAVE A PROBLEM!
65
posted on
08/07/2002 7:55:05 AM PDT
by
gunnedah
To: dighton
"According to the committee's chairman, William L. Roberts III, himself a journalist for Bloomberg News Service, there wasn't even a vote by the five-member BOARD."
66
posted on
08/07/2002 7:57:19 AM PDT
by
Reborn
To: Reborn
Oops! Glad I asked.
You may specify the punishment of your choice: anything but Castle Anthrax or the Comfy Chair.
67
posted on
08/07/2002 7:59:22 AM PDT
by
dighton
To: honway; Dog Gone
Incredible. Debka actually reported Iraq invaded Jordan? No. He is lying.
Dog Gone, you are lying. Something you claim you don't like Debka doing.
The anti-Debka people obviously have agendas. They lie more than Debka.
To: glorygirl
Who's next, newsmax.com, Criss Ruddy, then Lary Klayman won't be allowed in the courtroom?
To: glorygirl
The only problem I have with this is WND is often guilty of not telling "the rest of the story" or the "story behind the story".
I also know Jack Tory. While a lib, he's fair and takes his position as a journalist very seriously. I doubt that he would deny someone simply on who the reporter worked for.
Comment #71 Removed by Moderator
To: tallhappy
Dog Gone, you are lying. Something you claim you don't like Debka doing. I posted the proof. It's not my problem if you can't read.
72
posted on
08/07/2002 8:27:09 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
No. You distort and lie.
It is a perfectly reasonable scenario.
I have no idea if it is true and neither do you.
To: glorygirl
bttt
To: glorygirl
America's founders, fearing the day would come when Congress would make laws restricting the free press, crafted the First Amendment to the Constitution as a special protection against such abuse. They understood without a vibrant, independent watchdog, government would become too powerful, exceed its authority and the people would be deliberately kept in the dark about what Washington was doing.
And this is why porn is not protected under the first amendment. The first Amendment is to protect political speech, not decadent speech.
Ban porn, not the WND.
To: glorygirl
bump
76
posted on
08/07/2002 9:07:18 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: glorygirl
It's already happening in NJ. There's a big to-do here about McGreedy's secret doings, and the press ain't invited. Guess we know where the Democrats heart is on this issue. Now if it was porno, there'd be lawyers all over the place demanding free speech rights.
77
posted on
08/07/2002 9:24:19 AM PDT
by
lds23
To: goldstategop
In short, they are using the power of government to suppress competition and gain an unfair competitive advantage.
78
posted on
08/07/2002 9:58:48 AM PDT
by
Zon
To: tallhappy
Enjoy your fantasies, dude. If my failure to share them with you makes me a liar in your book, I'll bet I can live with it. In fact, I'll be concerned if you ever agree with me on anything.
79
posted on
08/07/2002 10:06:45 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: glorygirl; Fred Mertz; gPal; lawdog; MedicalMess; VaBthang4; VOA; Travis McGee; Zon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson