Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WND banned from covering Capitol (Paul Sperry)
WorldNet Daily ^ | 8/7/02 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 08/06/2002 11:32:43 PM PDT by glorygirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last
To: Hed
No, they reported that there was a plan to invade.

That's false. Read the link in Post #50.

Here's one laughable snippet, but there are many more.

Equally troubling, at the beginning of the week, the Iraqi force already in Jordan was sighted moving west, several groups having reached the sand dunes and wadis known as Abu Haffrah, about 80 km (50 miles) inside Jordanian territory.

King Abdullah decided to take command of the Jordanian forces still chasing the Iraqis intruders. That is why he looked so worried and tired – as though he had not slept for nights – in his public appearances in Amman in the past week. He also appeared in combat fatigues.

It's bad enough that WND prints this crap, but it's unbelievable to me that anyone here would defend it, or, in your case, have a case of total denial.

61 posted on 08/07/2002 7:46:24 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Reborn
Welcome Hed!! I agree with your thoughts 100%! I enjoy reading stuff at WND, and I hope that they sue this stupid board.

Let me make absolutely sure I've got this straight. You think WND should sue FreeRepublic?

62 posted on 08/07/2002 7:49:37 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
You have to be a puppet on a string to cover the Whitehouse anymore.We have taken Russia's place in the world of Communism and trying hard to take Chinas place in human rights violations.
63 posted on 08/07/2002 7:53:05 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
LOL I didn't know that FR has a board, lol. I'm referring to the main article.
64 posted on 08/07/2002 7:55:03 AM PDT by Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: gPal
Washington,WE HAVE A PROBLEM!
65 posted on 08/07/2002 7:55:05 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dighton
"According to the committee's chairman, William L. Roberts III, himself a journalist for Bloomberg News Service, there wasn't even a vote by the five-member BOARD."
66 posted on 08/07/2002 7:57:19 AM PDT by Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Reborn
Oops! Glad I asked.

You may specify the punishment of your choice: anything but Castle Anthrax or the Comfy Chair.

67 posted on 08/07/2002 7:59:22 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: honway; Dog Gone
Incredible. Debka actually reported Iraq invaded Jordan?

No. He is lying.

Dog Gone, you are lying. Something you claim you don't like Debka doing.

The anti-Debka people obviously have agendas. They lie more than Debka.

68 posted on 08/07/2002 8:04:13 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
Who's next, newsmax.com, Criss Ruddy, then Lary Klayman won't be allowed in the courtroom?
69 posted on 08/07/2002 8:15:23 AM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
The only problem I have with this is WND is often guilty of not telling "the rest of the story" or the "story behind the story".

I also know Jack Tory. While a lib, he's fair and takes his position as a journalist very seriously. I doubt that he would deny someone simply on who the reporter worked for.

70 posted on 08/07/2002 8:15:26 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: tallhappy
Dog Gone, you are lying. Something you claim you don't like Debka doing.

I posted the proof. It's not my problem if you can't read.

72 posted on 08/07/2002 8:27:09 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
No. You distort and lie.

It is a perfectly reasonable scenario.

I have no idea if it is true and neither do you.

73 posted on 08/07/2002 8:31:28 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
bttt
74 posted on 08/07/2002 8:36:38 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
America's founders, fearing the day would come when Congress would make laws restricting the free press, crafted the First Amendment to the Constitution as a special protection against such abuse.

They understood without a vibrant, independent watchdog, government would become too powerful, exceed its authority and the people would be deliberately kept in the dark about what Washington was doing.

And this is why porn is not protected under the first amendment. The first Amendment is to protect political speech, not decadent speech.

Ban porn, not the WND.

75 posted on 08/07/2002 9:00:47 AM PDT by Kobyashi1942
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
bump
76 posted on 08/07/2002 9:07:18 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
It's already happening in NJ. There's a big to-do here about McGreedy's secret doings, and the press ain't invited. Guess we know where the Democrats heart is on this issue. Now if it was porno, there'd be lawyers all over the place demanding free speech rights.
77 posted on 08/07/2002 9:24:19 AM PDT by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
In short, they are using the power of government to suppress competition and gain an unfair competitive advantage.
78 posted on 08/07/2002 9:58:48 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Enjoy your fantasies, dude. If my failure to share them with you makes me a liar in your book, I'll bet I can live with it. In fact, I'll be concerned if you ever agree with me on anything.
79 posted on 08/07/2002 10:06:45 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl; Fred Mertz; gPal; lawdog; MedicalMess; VaBthang4; VOA; Travis McGee; Zon
Related article...Paul Sperry's (then of IBD) WH story...
Clinton's Face Turned the Color of Raw Hamburger Meat ....
Source: BQ's view...With Radio America's Blanquita Cullum
Published: October 7, 1999; Author: Blanquita Cullum

80 posted on 08/07/2002 10:21:14 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson