Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
The Cato Institute ^ | August 3, 2002 | By Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 921-932 next last
To: Texasforever
Another quote .....

"You do know that I'm a member of the NRA, and my position on the right to bear arms is well known. But I want you to know something else, and I am going to say it in clear, unmistakable language. I support the Brady Bill, and I urge Congress to enact it without further delay".

President Ronald Reagan
March 28, 1991
Dedication remarks at The Ronald Reagan Institute of Emergency Medicine at The George Washington University Medical Center


641 posted on 08/05/2002 6:36:56 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
You betcha! Dreams are what keep us sane. Those and FR!
642 posted on 08/05/2002 6:41:02 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: Twodees; Howlin
I missed something.

Twodees - not to invite you back here, but I have to call you on this - in your post to Howlin you said this:

Uncle Bill was posting evidence of Clinton corruption while you were defending him against impeachment. Just start another of your campaigns and get him banned the way you did Registered. Call Gramps in here and you two get to work. You'll have another old time FReeper banned and you can congratulate each other.

Liberals. Ya'll make me sick.

46 posted on 8/4/02 9:20 PM Pacific by Twodees

You're a liar. I was so angry that you lied about Howlin getting Registered banned that I completely missed the first lie you told - that Howlin had defended Clinton during impeachment. No one addressed it, probably because it is so stinking absurd on its face - but I'm addressing it now.

643 posted on 08/05/2002 6:44:26 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: terilyn

LOL.... Well you know how it is with the perfessurs.... They expect you take what they say as gospel if'n it's be wrong or right...

I wonder if the tax payers are paying his salary while he freeps?

644 posted on 08/05/2002 6:46:31 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: deport
deport, you are the BEST.
645 posted on 08/05/2002 6:46:35 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Hi Harry. Isn't limited government grand?

Meanwhile, Back At The Farm

Bush promises to cut farm bill

"Rely less on government control of supply and more on market demand."
George W. Bush - During the 2000 campaign, Bush praised the 1996 "Freedom to Farm" bill and encouraged farmers to rely on markets. - Source

Waste & Abuse: Freedom to Farm or Freedom to Freeload?

"This farm bill will cost the average American taxpaying family $4,300 in higher taxes."

A Harvest of Pork By backing the farm bill, President Bush sells out his principles.
"the Bush administration, House and Senate conferees have agreed on a nearly 80% increase ($83 billion) in farm subsidies"

AND THESE ARE REPUBLICANS - "Despite the fact that the Republicans control the White House, the House of Representatives, and 30 governorships, the nation is now in the midst of the biggest government spending spree since LBJ. Incredibly, the domestic social welfare budget has expanded more in just two years ($96 billion) under George W. Bush than in Bill Clinton's first six years in office ($51 billion)."

646 posted on 08/05/2002 6:48:44 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: deport
I think I need to find me a government job. I can read at my non-taxpayer funded job, but I can't post :(
647 posted on 08/05/2002 6:49:57 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Pretty big on the hyperbole isn't he? A real tough guy with the keyboard.

I'm soooooooooo impressed...
648 posted on 08/05/2002 6:54:56 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: deport; Satadru
Thanks, deport.

Satadru, you don't have to apologize, but you could get to work on having the Supreme Court overturn that law.

649 posted on 08/05/2002 6:56:16 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; terilyn
Thanks... but Uncle Willie has such a purty thread here it's a shame not to post information to it. You know all these purty links, graphics, beautiful colors he takes the time to format. Mmaybe we can get Miss Jayne to start a special award for the purties post..... Unc' Willie would win it everytime....

terilyn, Yep employers are sorta funny that way....

650 posted on 08/05/2002 6:56:39 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Overturn it? Heck why not get little Tommie to rewrite that section as an amendment to some other legislation and be through with it. Why spend time fighting in the courts. Da perfessur is saying President Bush will be defeated in 04 so maybe his candidate can get lil' Tommie to affix that amendment, ya reckon?
651 posted on 08/05/2002 7:01:08 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Satadru, you don't have to apologize, but you could get to work on having the Supreme Court overturn that law.

It'll be done tomorrow, you know.

No shortage of eye-rollers around here...

652 posted on 08/05/2002 7:10:30 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Yes you are quite right. It is people like me that are wrong with FR.

You got something correct for a change.

653 posted on 08/05/2002 7:15:23 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Hi Harry. I think we need to eliminate the smoke and mirrors so others might learn the truth, don't you?
654 posted on 08/05/2002 7:18:43 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
You didn't follow your sidekick over to the Bush-hater's site?
655 posted on 08/05/2002 7:19:49 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Grow up. Take your childish, petty hate elsewhere.

Am I supposed to know who you are? Or care?
656 posted on 08/05/2002 7:23:33 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Yes, I admit the following quote was mine:

"LOL! As long as you don't stoop to paying for bush. "

If you are accusing me of occasionally (very rarely) posting a slightly off-color comment/joke, the I am GUILTY as charged. That comment was in bad taste, and I make no excuse for it.

However, you charged me with posting AFer type material and with trashing John Robinson. These are lies, and you know it. So yes, I am calling you a LIAR

657 posted on 08/05/2002 7:25:59 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Isn't it strange that those who have pretended to be on a higher level of morality than we lowly Bush supporters end up being outed by their own doing? Sweet irony I guess. If I remember correctly, the freeper in question here holds either an elected or appointed position in his church. I bet you they would be very proud right now.

First of all, I admit that the joke about not paying for "bush" was in bad taste and unbecoming of a Christian. I am guilty of sin.

However, I never pretended to be on a higher level of morality than you.

I'm sure you have never done anything as bad as what I did by posting that off color remark.

658 posted on 08/05/2002 7:32:45 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Hi Harry. I think we need to eliminate the smoke and mirrors so others might learn the truth, don't you?

this should be interesting, so bring it on!
659 posted on 08/05/2002 7:33:29 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
this should be interesting, so bring it on!

We haven't had a "moon landing was a hoax" thread in a long time.

660 posted on 08/05/2002 7:35:38 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 921-932 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson