This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
The Cato Institute ^
| August 3, 2002
| By Veronique de Rugy
Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 921-932 next last
To: nopardons
How about the federal school principal? How about enforcing drug laws in violation of the 4th and the 8th Amendment? Are those part of the job description?
461
posted on
08/05/2002 3:18:33 AM PDT
by
Satadru
To: Uncle Bill; TigersEye
You've done a great deal of reserch here, Uncle Bill, and made an impressive post with all these links. I appreciate that as well as your sentiments concerning big government.
I wonder if the CATO institute has someone in mind to run against President Bush in the Republican Primary...someone who could actually win an election nationwide? I fear that the division among conservative ranks may allow us to be conquered by the democrats in '04. A house divided against itself cannot stand.
To: nopardons
You suffer from selective memory. That won't wash either. BTW, you NEVER have anything of value to say and you are a weasle, a liar, a poltoon, and don't write English well . Allright, whatever you say. Go find the exchange you insist took place and post it here or you're the liar. I write English about as well as you do and I don't blame my mistakes on the keyboard. I still think your keyboard suffers more from alcoholic input than from battery trouble, but that's just a suspicion I have based on your posting style and irascibility. Naturally, you win this round because you called me three names without misspelling all three of them. You only misspelled two.
463
posted on
08/05/2002 3:20:15 AM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Libertarianize the GOP
Ah! I see the wittow Bwowneis having a wittow hissy fit today!
Pitty-pooh....pitty-pooh!
To: Satadru
Oh great. Another educator puke...claiming to be a conservative.
To: Uncle Bill
Bravo Uncle Bill (again)!
Drive the Bushbots crazy with the truth.
To: Uncle Bill
UB, I apologize to you for sidetracking the discussion on your thread. It wasn't my intent to do so, and I could have stopped early on, but I didn't. This thread was trashed by an argument I started. I'm sorry.
467
posted on
08/05/2002 3:29:25 AM PDT
by
Twodees
To: HalfIrish
The Bush justice department completely squashed the investigation into Chinagate. Ashcroft, in fact, is not releasing crucial evidence gathered from Johnny Chung, that might implicate the Clintons. Bush struck a deal with Democrats in Congress (read obstruction of justice and criminal conspiracy) not to go after the Clintons, otherwise the Democrats would go after him or shut down the government. BTW, there is no statute of limitation on federal felony charges. As such, he could have easily gone after Clinton. But, I am not sure he is serious about enforcing the laws of the nation. It is all rhetoric when he used to bray during the campaign saying, "When I put my hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the truth....blah blah blah....."
468
posted on
08/05/2002 3:29:52 AM PDT
by
Satadru
To: Twodees
Not a problem my friend. I always enjoy your keen intellect and debate. They will always gladly change the subject or name call or both. I think most folks, who want to know the truth, already know it.
To: Satadru
I know it, you know it and the head-in-the-sand status-quo supporters know it, too. That's why they continually try to drive the "debate" into other areas. They've clustered up a little more lately than they have in the past but the intellectual bankruptcy of their position is still crystal clear to those of us who refuse to bury our heads in the sand, or anywhere else.
To: Uncle Bill
Thanks for another well-done post, FRiend.
To: Abcdefg
Oh yea, check out Uraguay.
To: HalfIrish
Thanks so much! 8-)
To: RonPaulLives
SELF-BUMP to show to my friends who keep telling me how great "W" is.
To: Satadru
I was waiting for a summary article like this one. This better be on everyone's mind come 2004. Bush is a liberal RINO and should be given the boot. I just can't believe he fooled so many people to get electified. Don't go past tense too quickly. He STILL has many people convinced he is a conservative. Heck, look at many of the posts you see here on FR. Too many Americans are still hoping he'll be the champion they were looking for. Fact is, there aren't conservatives in government anymore. The soicalists have gotten very good at winning elections and "dumbing" the voting public.
To: .30Carbine
I fear that the division among conservative ranks may allow us to be conquered by the democrats in '04. A house divided against itself cannot stand. Don't forget that the left is divided, too. How many leftists peeled off from the Democratic party to vote for Nader? How many from the right peeled off of the GOP to vote for Phillips, Buchanan, etc? I believe they were more fractured than the right in 2000.
If Bush becomes so obnoxious to the right that he loses more votes to third parties than the Dems do, then he deserves to lose.
To: 2sheep; Uncle Bill; mrsmith; Texasforever; Joe Hadenuf; kcpopps; oceanperch; A Navy Vet; ...
To: It'salmosttolate
We can guess how the sycophants will respond to the Tag Team story. First, they'll attack Klayman then they'll come up with some obscure Scottish-law reason why defending Hillary is in the best interests of the country. A broken record would sound better.
To: It'salmosttolate
The first link goes nowhere, by the way.
To: Texasforever
Hey! I see that the rest of the animals came out in the dead of the night!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 921-932 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson