HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?

The Cato Institute ^ | August 3, 2002 | By Veronique de Rugy

[Texasforever]

Look if he didn't think it was a "big deal" he would have posted his own personal information when asked. The BOY just ain't RIGHT.

[nopardons]

How 2Ds can defend this, is simple. HE HATES THE LIKES OF HOWLIN ET AL, AND IS IN A CLIQUE, WHICH DEFENDS EACH OTHER, WHETHER IT'S JUSTIFIABLE OR NOT .

[terilyn]

Considering the thread was pulled and he got a time out, I'd say that it was an actionable offense. Otherwise I the post simply would have been pulled and that would have been the end of it had somebody complained.

You're arguing yourself into a corner here. But thanks for providing more evidence for the prosecution.

[Texasforever]

In a true constitutional republic, W would have been reigned in long ago.

Oh hell go and channel the founders. GOD what idiocy.

[woofie]

Wow...Nice fight

[Twodees]

Now I've posted the facts, with hard evidence, and you still claim I'm imagining things.

No offense, ma'am, but you gave a demonstration which didn't work until you manipulated the input. That hardly qualifies as "posting the facts with hard evidence". Good day.

[Texasforever]

Charging him with treason would not be beyond the realm of possibility. An accessory after the fact in aiding Clinton's flight from justice would be a good first charge.

Well your name is HALF right.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

I know I've made my point, proven it with facts, done the homework, and provided you the links. There are several witnesses here as to what occurred and yet you choose to believe what you want to.

There is no question you're right, and any person reading this objectively knows that already.

It's terribly draining to fight with a liar, but, you won and I think it was worth it.

Have a good night.

[nopardons]

I'll type it again; just for your bennefit.

NO PRESIDENT, PAST OR PRESENT, HAS THE POWER / AUTHORITY / PRESCIENDT TO GO AFTER HIS PREDESSOR; ESPECIALLY IF SAID PREDESSESSOR HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPEACHED, B UT NOT THROWN OUT OF OFFICE ! Nowhere, is what you want him to do, part of the job description. It would also serve NO valid purpose; however, it WOULD eviscerate President Bush's ability to do anything else. Just what we neeed ... RIGHT ?

Learn what is possible , what is workable, and detach your emotions. prior to attempting to rationally and factually ( something you have NOT done ) debate any / all issues.

[Texasforever]

Wow...Nice fight

Actually it was a simple turkey shoot.

[Mo1]

There is no question you're right, and any person reading this objectively knows that already.

I agree ..

With that I'm off to bed

Sweet Dreams Y'all

[terilyn]

I entered the damn date of birth which Reg could have found here had he looked hard enough or saved it for future reference, and obviously did in order to get the info he got to come up and then posted it here.

Yeah, I'm the master manipulator.

You remind me of my now deceased father-in-law. One night while playing poker he insisted he knew the rules of a particular game. No matter that everyone else believed the rules to be different. He went so far as to call a casino in Vegas to prove his point. He was wrong. When he got off the phone he announced that the casino agreed with the rest of us, but that the casino obviously was wrong too and we had to play by his rules.

He was an ex-alcoholic too. One of the most common signs of an ex-alcoholic is that they can never admit they are wrong. Believe me, I'm married to another one.

[nopardons]

errrrrrrrr ... precident.

[terilyn]

Thanks, you have a good night too!

[Twodees]

And how you can defend this is beyond me

I'm not "defending this", lady. I simply doubt it happened as y'all are describing it. Something like that should have gotten a poster nuked and permanently banned because that is indeed a very bad thing. But it just resulted in a suspension, right? Hmmm.

This started with my mistake in saying that he was banned, when it's just a suspension. I was mistaken and have admitted it. Y'all now want me to accept your word that a long time poster here stalked someone and posted personal info not just about her but about several other people. Sorry, but you're embellishing the thing past the point of belief.

[HalfIrish]

More obfuscation.. you turn Bush's active participation in covering up Clinton's law-breaking into merely inaction on "going after him." Bury your head in the sand if you like. I won't do it.

[Twodees]

Tell ya what give me a week and I can have you signing a different tune. </i.

OK, boy. Show me where to sign. I'll sign your tune. I'll sign a couple of different tunes Whatever you say. You have a week. Now stagger off and pass out. Wait a minute, son. Why do you want me to sign a tune? If I don't sign will you get mad? Have another bump before bed.

[Mo1]

Sorry pal .. you ARE defending his actions by calling us all lairs ..

And why he wasn't banned I don't know .. take that up with the boss ..

But I will say this much .. that night and the information he posted creeped me out and made feel VERY uneasy

[nopardons]

You are relatively NEW here, don't know enough to understand suspension and bannings, soooooooooo permit me ( yes, I know, full well, that you won't believe me, but give it a shot )to enlighten you.

There are some posters, here, who get banned outright,for very little, and there are some, who get banned ( suspended ) again, and again, and again, and AGAIN, under their original nics, for far worse. That's the hsitory here. As for " satlking ", what has been described here, was NOT really cyber stalking. Some of us HAVE indeed been thread stalked. That is something else. Others, have been cyber stalked, all over the net. That isn't exactly what happened to Howlin . You're waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out of your depths. Just exit quietly.

[Twodees]

Ask Howlin if she thinks I hate her. Anyway, you're going to fall off the couch and break your web TV keyboard. Take it easy, allright?