This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
The Cato Institute ^
| August 3, 2002
| By Veronique de Rugy
Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 921-932 next last
To: Mo1; Twodees
Look if he didn't think it was a "big deal" he would have posted his own personal information when asked. The BOY just ain't RIGHT.
To: Mo1
How 2Ds can defend this, is simple. HE HATES THE LIKES OF HOWLIN ET AL, AND IS IN A CLIQUE, WHICH DEFENDS EACH OTHER, WHETHER IT'S JUSTIFIABLE OR NOT .
To: Twodees
Considering the thread was pulled and he got a time out, I'd say that it was an actionable offense. Otherwise I the post simply would have been pulled and that would have been the end of it had somebody complained.
You're arguing yourself into a corner here. But thanks for providing more evidence for the prosecution.
423
posted on
08/05/2002 1:54:41 AM PDT
by
terilyn
To: HalfIrish
In a true constitutional republic, W would have been reigned in long ago. Oh hell go and channel the founders. GOD what idiocy.
To: Texasforever
Wow...Nice fight
425
posted on
08/05/2002 1:56:32 AM PDT
by
woofie
To: terilyn
Now I've posted the facts, with hard evidence, and you still claim I'm imagining things. No offense, ma'am, but you gave a demonstration which didn't work until you manipulated the input. That hardly qualifies as "posting the facts with hard evidence". Good day.
426
posted on
08/05/2002 1:56:38 AM PDT
by
Twodees
To: HalfIrish
Charging him with treason would not be beyond the realm of possibility. An accessory after the fact in aiding Clinton's flight from justice would be a good first charge. Well your name is HALF right.
To: terilyn
I know I've made my point, proven it with facts, done the homework, and provided you the links. There are several witnesses here as to what occurred and yet you choose to believe what you want to.There is no question you're right, and any person reading this objectively knows that already.
It's terribly draining to fight with a liar, but, you won and I think it was worth it.
Have a good night.
To: HalfIrish
I'll type it again; just for your bennefit.
NO PRESIDENT, PAST OR PRESENT, HAS THE POWER / AUTHORITY / PRESCIENDT TO GO AFTER HIS PREDESSOR; ESPECIALLY IF SAID PREDESSESSOR HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPEACHED, B UT NOT THROWN OUT OF OFFICE ! Nowhere, is what you want him to do, part of the job description. It would also serve NO valid purpose; however, it WOULD eviscerate President Bush's ability to do anything else. Just what we neeed ... RIGHT ?
Learn what is possible , what is workable, and detach your emotions. prior to attempting to rationally and factually ( something you have NOT done ) debate any / all issues.
To: woofie
Wow...Nice fight Actually it was a simple turkey shoot.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; terilyn; All
There is no question you're right, and any person reading this objectively knows that already. I agree ..
With that I'm off to bed
Sweet Dreams Y'all
431
posted on
08/05/2002 2:02:24 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Twodees
I entered the damn date of birth which Reg could have found here had he looked hard enough or saved it for future reference, and obviously did in order to get the info he got to come up and then posted it here.
Yeah, I'm the master manipulator.
You remind me of my now deceased father-in-law. One night while playing poker he insisted he knew the rules of a particular game. No matter that everyone else believed the rules to be different. He went so far as to call a casino in Vegas to prove his point. He was wrong. When he got off the phone he announced that the casino agreed with the rest of us, but that the casino obviously was wrong too and we had to play by his rules.
He was an ex-alcoholic too. One of the most common signs of an ex-alcoholic is that they can never admit they are wrong. Believe me, I'm married to another one.
432
posted on
08/05/2002 2:02:35 AM PDT
by
terilyn
To: nopardons
errrrrrrrr ... precident.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Thanks, you have a good night too!
434
posted on
08/05/2002 2:03:13 AM PDT
by
terilyn
To: Mo1
And how you can defend this is beyond meI'm not "defending this", lady. I simply doubt it happened as y'all are describing it. Something like that should have gotten a poster nuked and permanently banned because that is indeed a very bad thing. But it just resulted in a suspension, right? Hmmm.
This started with my mistake in saying that he was banned, when it's just a suspension. I was mistaken and have admitted it. Y'all now want me to accept your word that a long time poster here stalked someone and posted personal info not just about her but about several other people. Sorry, but you're embellishing the thing past the point of belief.
435
posted on
08/05/2002 2:06:45 AM PDT
by
Twodees
To: nopardons
More obfuscation.. you turn Bush's active participation in covering up Clinton's law-breaking into merely inaction on "going after him." Bury your head in the sand if you like. I won't do it.
To: Texasforever
Tell ya what give me a week and I can have you signing a different tune. </i. OK, boy. Show me where to sign. I'll sign your tune. I'll sign a couple of different tunes Whatever you say. You have a week. Now stagger off and pass out. Wait a minute, son. Why do you want me to sign a tune? If I don't sign will you get mad? Have another bump before bed.
437
posted on
08/05/2002 2:10:28 AM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Twodees
Sorry pal .. you ARE defending his actions by calling us all lairs ..
And why he wasn't banned I don't know .. take that up with the boss ..
But I will say this much .. that night and the information he posted creeped me out and made feel VERY uneasy
438
posted on
08/05/2002 2:11:14 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Twodees
You are relatively NEW here, don't know enough to understand suspension and bannings, soooooooooo permit me ( yes, I know, full well, that you won't believe me, but give it a shot )to enlighten you.
There are some posters, here, who get banned outright,for very little, and there are some, who get banned ( suspended ) again, and again, and again, and AGAIN, under their original nics, for far worse. That's the hsitory here. As for " satlking ", what has been described here, was NOT really cyber stalking. Some of us HAVE indeed been thread stalked. That is something else. Others, have been cyber stalked, all over the net. That isn't exactly what happened to Howlin . You're waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out of your depths. Just exit quietly.
To: nopardons
Ask Howlin if she thinks I hate her. Anyway, you're going to fall off the couch and break your web TV keyboard. Take it easy, allright?
440
posted on
08/05/2002 2:12:44 AM PDT
by
Twodees
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420, 421-440, 441-460 ... 921-932 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson