Skip to comments.
Bush ready to declare war
The Observer (U.K.) ^
| 08/04/2002
| Peter Beaumont, Gaby Hinsliff and Paul Beaver
Posted on 08/03/2002 5:12:09 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: sinkspur
US and British forces will cut through Iraq like a knife through butter Right,.......The British forces ALWAYS "go in" FIRST!
21
posted on
08/03/2002 6:27:49 PM PDT
by
maestro
To: max61
As I expected, it's always the libertarian who's first to use vulgarities.
No wonder you guys can't win any elections.
22
posted on
08/03/2002 6:29:30 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Pokey78
I was polled today--"Should we strike first"
Yes I said, and the first missle should go to its' target through Klink.
To: Hank Kerchief
I did volunteer(enlist)over 60 years ago--and then spent over 5 years of my life serving this Nation when she needed me and those like me---if you want to enjoy the fruits of freedom, sometimes you have to 'pay up' for them---I trust my President to know what to do for the protections of all, even the 'peaceniks' who want others to fight for them--we used to call them "yellowbellies"--what are they now?
To: Hank Kerchief; max61
Hoping that a person's children die probably makes YOU feel good. But what a sick comment. I wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy. Nice going. Really really contributed to this thread.
25
posted on
08/03/2002 6:32:06 PM PDT
by
justshe
To: maestro
Right,.......The British forces ALWAYS "go in" FIRST! We went in first in Afghanistan. But, hey, maybe they'll flip a coin.
Or, maybe they'll go in together.
The Brits damn sure didn't go in first in 1991.
26
posted on
08/03/2002 6:33:15 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: max61
I served in the U.S. Marine Corps and my MOS was 5937 (Aviation Radio Repairman). If the Marine Corps needs this 40-year-old to re-up to fight Iraq, all they have to do is send me the draft notice. I still got my uniforms up in the attic.
To: Pokey78
It is so unfair that the US has a near monopoly on high tech weapons, and seems to win wars these days with very low casualties. Is there any equity in that? If I believed what I read from some here at FR about the emerging US police state, my angst that it would be spread across the globe by dint of force would keep me up at nights. But as it is, I sleep soundly at night, and most days (excepting those where a judge screws me) I am suffused with joy, both macro and micro. I must be a sociopath or something.
28
posted on
08/03/2002 6:40:11 PM PDT
by
Torie
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: Pokey78
Look for it around January.
If I am not mistaken that was the month the ground offensive stepped off in 91.
To: Hank Kerchief; Admin Moderator
How dare you say such a thing.
If you dont like the idea of war with Iraq then make it known but your remark was completely asinine and uncalled for.
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: yendu bwam
I dunno, man. I say sneak attack. Moonless night. Special Ops. Stealth bombers. Cruise missles. Decapitating strike.
This notion of giving Saddam months to disperse forces, incl missles targeted on Tel Aviv, and to distribute nerve agents and small pox to his terrorist buddies, has me really, really nervous. Even giving him weeks is, at this point, extremely dangerous IMHO.
The downside? If we go without getting all our ducks in a row, internationally speaking, we (the U.S.) could get stuck with paying the full bill. It'll be something like 20 to 30 billion (including the one to five years of sheparding and security that will have to be provided to the new government).
34
posted on
08/03/2002 6:48:30 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
I'm ready to go and so is my 16 year old son. I'm sure that you never met a joint you didn't smoke. I've met your kind before.
You disgust me!!!
Good, I'm glad your ready, you can join me on duty. Maybe I'll paint your name on a 500 pounder, would that make you happy?.
To call you a sheep would insult the animal.
---max
35
posted on
08/03/2002 6:49:28 PM PDT
by
max61
Comment #36 Removed by Moderator
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: Hank Kerchief
Hank,
Your response was so strange, I was going to respond. But first, I wanted to read from where you were coming from. I went to your home page and saw...nothing.
I then did a search by your name. I see that your reponses although thoughtful and intellegent, seem to be narrow in focus.
I trust you have personal reasons for not supporting a war, I wonder if it is this war, or all wars. Is there anything you feel is valuable enough to risk your life for?
Devotion to duty, honor and country are abstract concepts, but men have died for less. If possible, I would join the force in the coming battle in Iraq. I would be willing to fight, and yes die, so you sir could stay home and scold those that go in your place.
After all, I did it before, I could do it again.
To: cmotormac44
we used to call them "yellowbellies"--what are they now?Libertarians, apparently.
39
posted on
08/03/2002 6:52:09 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: another cricket
The President cannot declare War.
I don't think the British press knows that. Of course, I am not sure the American press does either. Hmm, maybe he can?
40
posted on
08/03/2002 6:54:05 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-179 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson